Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies最新文献_第3页

Talk and Textual Production in Medieval England by Marisa Libbon (review) 《中世纪英格兰的谈话与文本生产》玛丽莎·利邦著(书评)

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0024

Jamie K. Taylor

引用次数: 0

The HMML Authority File: Current Status and Future Directions html授权文件:当前状态和未来方向

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0019

Denise Soufi, D. Gullo

引用次数: 0

The First Arabic Annals: Fragments of Umayyad History by Edward Zychowicz-Coghill (review) 《第一部阿拉伯编年史:倭马亚人历史片段》作者:爱德华·兹乔维茨-科吉尔(Edward Zychowicz-Coghill)

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0026

P. Cobb

{"title":"The First Arabic Annals: Fragments of Umayyad History by Edward Zychowicz-Coghill (review)","authors":"P. Cobb","doi":"10.1353/mns.2022.0026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2022.0026","url":null,"abstract":"visualizations. Its wellthoughtout schemas certainly support its primary use case. Its narrow focus has allowed its authors to avoid scopecreep and produce a finishable project that, due to its static nature, should in theory allow it to be sustained for a long time. At the same time, as our comments suggest, even a static site requires maintenance. And we wonder whether there will be sufficient energy and financing for this maintenance in the long run. If sufficient resources are not available to maintain this specific code base, we expect the longterm future life of this data to lie somewhere in its integration into larger datasets that can be maintained more efficiently by a more scalable code base. But here its unique data organization and narrow focus make its integration within larger corpora more difficult. The labor required for such an integration will certainly take some work and perhaps threaten its future viability. Nevertheless, the quality and precision of its semantic encoding is an encouraging sign that, when the time comes for integration into a larger code base, a near lossless transformation of the underlying data should be possible; again, with the caveat that there is enough interest and labor to study the existing schema closely and write the necessary transformation rules.","PeriodicalId":40527,"journal":{"name":"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73320165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Revisiting the Codex Buranus: Contents, Contexts, Compositions ed. by Tristan E. Franklinos and Henry Hope (review) 重访布兰纳斯抄本:内容，背景，组成由特里斯坦E.富兰克林和亨利霍普编辑(评论)

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0029

J. W. Mason

引用次数: 1

User-Friendly Software for Identifying Moldmates and Twins in Antique Laid Paper: Case Study of a Disbound Blank Book 用户友好的软件识别模伴和双胞胎在古董铺设纸:一个拆装空白书的案例研究

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0020

Abigail Slawik, M. Ellis, W. Sethares, C. R. Johnson

{"title":"User-Friendly Software for Identifying Moldmates and Twins in Antique Laid Paper: Case Study of a Disbound Blank Book","authors":"Abigail Slawik, M. Ellis, W. Sethares, C. R. Johnson","doi":"10.1353/mns.2022.0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2022.0020","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract (Lang: English):This progress report details the imaging and initial analysis of watermarks and countermarks present in antique, laid paper leaves from a partial, disbound blank book in the study collection of the Conservation Center at the Institute of Fine Arts at NYU. Preliminary review of watermark catalogues indicates that the paper, featuring the coat-of-arms of Le Tellier of three stars over three lizards, and a countermark reading “H. J. Cusson,” dates roughly from the late seventeenth to early eighteenth centuries. Of the approximately 115 sheets, 20 were analysed using software developed by William A. Sethares (University of Wisconsin, Madison) and C. Richard Johnson, Jr. (Cornell University) to reliably predict whether individual papers were likely to have been made by the same papermaking mold. The programs allowed for the comparison of watermark and countermark shapes by comparison of the ratios of their internal proportions (WatermarkMarker), and the generation of animated overlay .gifs that fade from one image to the next, for instant visual comparison (WatermarkPointMarker and VisualizeOverlays). The incidence of watermarks and moldmates in the folios were also mapped using the VisCodex online collation visualization tool, developed by the University of Toronto Libraries, in collaboration with Dot Porter and Alberto Campagnolo. The results suggest that the stack of sheets was made from two papermaking molds, making the papers moldmates and twins. The progress report concludes with a hypothesis as to which watermark was connected to which countermark, and suggests that the connections between half-sheets may be more easily recreated after more sheets have been analyzed both visually, and with the software.","PeriodicalId":40527,"journal":{"name":"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80108251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Three Manuscript Notes on the Emperor Nerva 《涅尔瓦皇帝三手记》

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0022

T. Izbicki

引用次数: 0

One Binding, Two Binders? A Greek-Style Binding Made in Italy: The Case of Brussels, Royal Library of Belgium, MS 11344 一个装订，两个装订?意大利制作的希腊式装帧:以布鲁塞尔为例，比利时皇家图书馆，MS 11344

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0017

Georgios Boudalis, Anna Gialdini

{"title":"One Binding, Two Binders? A Greek-Style Binding Made in Italy: The Case of Brussels, Royal Library of Belgium, MS 11344","authors":"Georgios Boudalis, Anna Gialdini","doi":"10.1353/mns.2022.0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2022.0017","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract (Lang: English):From c. 1450 to c. 1580, Greek-style bindings made in western Europe (also known as ‘alla greca’ bindings) were produced in a number of locales, mainly in Venice, Florence, Rome, and the court of France. Popular with collectors from the fifteenth century to this day, these bindings show a variety of techniques and different degrees of hybridism between the Byzantine practices which they imitated and the western European techniques of the time. Various theories have been explored as to the ethnicity of their makers (Greek or Italian) but so far, very little is known on the topic.This article uses the case study of a manuscript at the Royal Library of Belgium (MS 11344 (Omont 79)) and its binding, which displays both Greek and Italian elements. The manuscript’s endbands were made according to a sophisticated Byzantine technique called ‘full wrapped on multiple additional cores twined endband’; the tooling of the covers, on the other hand, was made using typically Italian tools of the turn of the sixteenth century. This suggests a collaboration between a Greek and an Italian binder, which can cast new light on the making of Greek-style bindings more in general; it also makes a case for using the study of bookbinding techniques to investigate the social and cultural history of the book.","PeriodicalId":40527,"journal":{"name":"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88751285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Glosses to the First Book of the Etymologiae of Isidore of Seville: A Digital Scholarly Edition ed. by Evina Steinová (review) 塞维利亚伊西多尔语源学第一本书注释:数字学术版，Evina steinovi编辑<e:1>(评论)

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0025

J. Witt, Nicolás Vaughan

引用次数: 1

Reading English Verse in Manuscript, c. 1350–c. 1500 by Daniel Sawyer (review) 阅读英语诗歌手稿，约1350-c。《1500》丹尼尔·索耶著(书评)

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0023

E. Strakhov

引用次数: 0

The Position of Jewish Art and Exegesis in an Illustrated Christian Biblical Commentary: Ezekiel’s Vision of the Tetramorph in Fourteenth-and Fifteenth-Century Manuscripts and Printed Copies of Nicholas of Lyra’s Postilla litteralis 犹太艺术和注释在基督教圣经注释中的地位:以西结在十四和十五世纪的手稿和Lyra的Postilla litteralis的尼古拉斯印刷副本中的四变形的愿景

IF 0.2

Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1353/mns.2022.0018

Sarah Bromberg

{"title":"The Position of Jewish Art and Exegesis in an Illustrated Christian Biblical Commentary: Ezekiel’s Vision of the Tetramorph in Fourteenth-and Fifteenth-Century Manuscripts and Printed Copies of Nicholas of Lyra’s Postilla litteralis","authors":"Sarah Bromberg","doi":"10.1353/mns.2022.0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2022.0018","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract (Lang: English):In the Postilla litteralis (Literal Commentary) (1322-1333), Nicholas of Lyra, a Franciscan biblical scholar at the University of Paris, compared Jewish and Christian commentaries on the Old Testament and designed illustrations and diagrams to augment those comparisons. The Postilla litteralis was copied with such an astounding frequency that it can be considered a medieval best seller. These manuscript and printed copies often included copies of Nicholas’ illustrations. This article uses a singular case study of Nicholas of Lyra’s visual comparisons between Latin and Hebrew exegesis regarding the Old Testament prophet Ezekiel’s vision of four winged creatures to shed light on how copies of Nicholas of Lyra’s illustrations represent Jewish visual and textual exegetical traditions. The goal of this article is to provide a nuanced exploration of fourteenth and fifteenth-century copies of Postilla litteralis manuscripts that display Nicholas’ illustrations of Ezekiel’s first vision. These images reveal a reliance on rabbinic commentary regarding literal meanings of scripture yet ultimately reject Jewish visual traditions of representing the divine, a strategy that supports Nicholas’ messianic interpretation of Ezekiel 1. This article uses illuminations and woodcuts in manuscript and printed copies of the Postilla litteralis, illuminations in Hebrew bible and prayer manuscripts, and illuminations in other Christian biblical commentaries to consider Nicholas’ multifaceted and varied perceptions of Jewish commentary on Ezekiel 1. I end by claiming that the copies of the Postilla litteralis’ visual comparisons between Jewish and Christian commentary operate to clarify inconsistencies within Christian iconography regarding Ezekiel 1.","PeriodicalId":40527,"journal":{"name":"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73707024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0