Quaestiones Disputatae最新文献_第8页

Beauty and Desecration 美丽与亵渎

IF 0.2

Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/QUD.2016.0010

R. Scruton

引用次数: 0

The Beauty that Pierces the Heart: Joseph Ratzinger’s Christological Understanding of Beauty 穿透心灵的美:约瑟夫·拉辛格对美的基督理解

IF 0.2

Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/QUD.2016.0005

Alessandro Rovati

引用次数: 0

Embodied Temporalization and the Mind-Body Problem 具身时间化与身心问题

IF 0.2

Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.5840/QD20167117

James R. Mensch

引用次数: 0

Sharing Our Time with the Time of the World 与世界时间分享我们的时间

IF 0.2

Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.5840/QD20167118

Martin Möhlmann

引用次数: 0

Husserl’s Diagrams and Models of Immanent Temporality 胡塞尔的内在时间性图与模型

IF 0.2

Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.5840/QD20167114

Horacio M. R. Banega

{"title":"Husserl’s Diagrams and Models of Immanent Temporality","authors":"Horacio M. R. Banega","doi":"10.5840/QD20167114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD20167114","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to clarify how Husserl applies his formal ontology to the constitution of immanent temporality. By doing so, my objective is to unravel the relationships between the phases of this temporality that make up a unit—that is, the relationship between protentions and retentions and a proto-impression that gives rise to the temporal moment “now” in an experience of the immanent consciousness. In connection with this reconstruction, I will attempt to clarify Husserl’s definition of time as a “one-dimensional orthoid multiplicity,” the roots of which lie in Riemann’s work. I interpret Husserl’s description as a model for the description of the phenomenon of time. Its nature as a model seems to unfold with the problem of the time diagram. Which diagram best represents the constitution of immanent temporality? Larrabee has discussed this issue, and I propose that the best interpretation of the diagram is to consider it as applying to a spherical surface rather than a flat one. This interpretation allows us to account for the multiple relationships among presentations, memories, and other presentifications in an empirically appropriate manner while at the same time providing us with another vision of Husserl’s consciousness, which allows us to reconsider the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity.","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":"54 1","pages":"47 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85583303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Some Reflections on Time and the Ego in Husserl’s Late Texts on Time-Consciousness 胡塞尔《时间意识》晚期文本中关于时间与自我的若干思考

IF 0.2

Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.5840/QD20167116

John B. Brough

{"title":"Some Reflections on Time and the Ego in Husserl’s Late Texts on Time-Consciousness","authors":"John B. Brough","doi":"10.5840/QD20167116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD20167116","url":null,"abstract":"Time-consciousness made its appearance in Husserl’s thought in the first decade of the twentieth century in analyses that were notably silent on the issue of the ego. The ego itself made its debut in the Ideas in 1913, but without an account of its relationship to time. Husserl described time-consciousness, particularly what he called the absolute time-constituting flow of consciousness, as perhaps the most important matter in all of phenomenology. He also came to view phenomenology as centered on the study of the ego understood as transcendental subjectivity. It was not until the last years of his life, however, in his late writings on time-consciousness collected as the C-manuscripts, that Husserl made a serious effort to work out the connections between these two themes. The point of this essay is to examine how Husserl sought to understand the relation between the ego and temporal awareness in the C-manuscripts. I will argue that in these late texts, Husserl preserves and deepens his early understanding of the absolute flow of time-consciousness but that he also attempts to show how the flow is interwoven with the ego’s constitution of itself and of the world. Time-consciousness plays a role on every level of egological constitution. At the same time, egological constitution contributes to the consciousness of time, and particularly to the constitution of the Husserlian monad, the ego understood not simply as the bare pole from which conscious acts radiate but in its full concreteness as embracing its unique individual history.","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":"360 1","pages":"108 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76461553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Grief: Putting the Past before Us 悲伤:把过去摆在我们面前

IF 0.2

Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.5840/QD20167120

M. Kelly

{"title":"Grief: Putting the Past before Us","authors":"M. Kelly","doi":"10.5840/QD20167120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD20167120","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Grief research in philosophy agrees that one who grieves grieves over the irreversible loss of someone whom the griever loved deeply, and that someone thus factored centrally into the griever’s sense of purpose and meaning in the world. The analytic literature in general tends to focus its treatments on the paradigm case of grief as the death of a loved one. I want to restrict my account to the paradigm case because the paradigm case most persuades the mind that grief is a past-directed emotion. The phenomenological move I propose will enable us to (1) respect the paradigm case of grief and a broader but still legitimate set of grief-generating states of affairs, (2) liberate grief from the view that grief is past directed or about the past, and thus (3) account for grief in a way that separates it from its closest emotion-neighbor, sorrow, without having to rely on the affective quality of those two emotions.If the passing of the beloved causes the grief but is not what the grief is about, then we can get at the nature of grief by saying its temporal orientation is in the past (the event of the passing), but its temporal meaning is the present and future—the new significance of a world with the pervasive absence that is the world without the beloved. The no-longer of grief is a no-longer oriented by a past (that which is no longer) that is referred a present and future (that which is a no-longer understood as not now as it once was). Looking at the griever’s relation to time can tell us much about the pain and the object of grief, then. As the griever puts the past before himself with a certainty about this world “henceforth,” a look at the griever’s lived sense of the finality of the irreversibly lost (1) liberates grief from the tendency in the literature to be reduced to a past-directed emotion, (2) accounts for grief’s intensity, its affective force or poignancy, and thus (3) enables us to separate grief from sorrow according to its intentional object in light of the temporal meaning of these emotions.","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":"61 1","pages":"156 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89612929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Persons Divine and Human: an Analogical Conception 神与人:类比的概念

IF 0.2

Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2015-09-19 DOI: 10.5840/QD20156131

Philip A. Rolnick

引用次数: 1

Love and the Metaphysics of Being: Aquinas, Clarke, and Wojtyla 爱与存在的形而上学:阿奎那、克拉克和沃伊蒂拉

IF 0.2

Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2015-09-19 DOI: 10.5840/QD20156128

R. M. H. Lemmons

引用次数: 0

The Thomistic Personalism of Norris Clarke, SJ 诺里斯·克拉克的托马斯式人格主义