Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance最新文献_第9页

AGENT-CHANGE RELATION: EU MEMBERSHIP AND THE NEW DYNAMICS OF ROMANIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 代理人-变动关系:欧盟成员国身份与罗马尼亚公共行政的新动态

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-12-28 DOI: 10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.2.04

C. Dogot

引用次数: 0

RUSSIAN – UKRAINIAN CONFLICT REVISITED: TOWARDS REGIME CHANGE IN RUSSIA? 重新审视俄乌冲突:俄罗斯走向政权更迭?

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.25019/europolity.2017.11.2.07

R. Machnikowski

引用次数: 1

AFTER BREXIT: THE CHALLENGES OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN EUROPE AND LATIN AMERICA 英国脱欧后:欧洲和拉丁美洲高等教育面临的挑战

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.25019/europolity.2017.11.2.01

Fernando Galván

引用次数: 1

GEOPOLITICS AT THE EASTERN BORDERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: EASTERN EUROPE BETWEEN THE EU AND RUSSIA 欧盟东部边界的地缘政治:欧盟与俄罗斯之间的东欧

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.25019/europolity.2017.11.2.05

Dacian Duna

引用次数: 0

EUROPEAN UNION SUPPORT AND TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE PROCESSES IN KOSOVO 欧洲联盟对科索沃过渡时期司法进程的支持

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.25019/europolity.2017.11.2.06

Remzije Istrefi

引用次数: 1

BOOK REVIEW Valentin Naumescu and Dan Dungaciu (editors). 2015. The European Union’s Eastern Neighbourhood Today: Politics, Dynamics, Perspectives. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 365 pages. ISBN (10): 1-4438-7191-5 瓦伦丁·诺梅斯库和丹·邓加休(编辑)。2015. 欧盟东部邻国的今天:政治，动态，前景。泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔:剑桥学者出版社，365页。Isbn (10): 1-4438-7191-5

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-06-30 DOI: 10.25019/europolity.2017.11.1.08

I. Ciolan

引用次数: 0

IN LINE WITH BRUSSELS. ROMANIAN AND BULGARIAN POSITION ON THE UKRAINIAN CRISIS 与布鲁塞尔一致。罗马尼亚和保加利亚对乌克兰危机的立场

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-06-30 DOI: 10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.05

A. Mihaylova, P. Dimitrov

{"title":"IN LINE WITH BRUSSELS. ROMANIAN AND BULGARIAN POSITION ON THE UKRAINIAN CRISIS","authors":"A. Mihaylova, P. Dimitrov","doi":"10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.05","url":null,"abstract":"The Ukrainian crisis has been a test for the alignment of Romania and Bulgaria with the EU on the background of the Union’s new foreign policy instruments as redesigned by the Lisbon Treaty. This paper aims to present the positions of Bulgaria and Romania towards the events of 2013-2015 in Ukraine. Our research target is to identify the driving forces that shaped these positions, to analyse and describe the main foreign policy goals and actions of Bucharest and Sofia regarding the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, and to compare the attitude of these two countries toward the Ukrainian crisis. The paper analyses first the Romanian and the Bulgarian perspectives on the dramatic events in Ukraine in the first half of 2014. The positions of the two countries are further placed in the wider international context of the Ukrainian crisis – the UN resolutions, the EU sanctions against Russia, NATO activities, and the security in the Black Sea region. In the third part Romania and Bulgaria are viewed as a “playground” for the competing narratives and propaganda in regards to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. We also examine the economic impact of the crisis on the two Balkan countries, as well as the efforts of both Bucharest and Sofia to protect their respective minorities in Ukraine. In conclusion, we summarize the results of our research and explain how the Ukrainian crisis has reshaped the foreign policy debates in Romania and Bulgaria.","PeriodicalId":40359,"journal":{"name":"Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90568548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Fap Alc-Ue’S Model Of Cooperation Between The European Union And Latin America And The Caribbean In The Field Of Higher Education, Science, Technology And Innovation Fap Alc-Ue的欧盟与拉丁美洲和加勒比地区在高等教育、科学、技术和创新领域的合作模式

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-06-30 DOI: 10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.03

I. Dodi

引用次数: 1

(De-)Constructing Serbian Russophilia In The Context Of The Crisis In Ukraine 乌克兰危机背景下塞尔维亚亲俄主义的建构

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-06-30 DOI: 10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.04

Eugenia-Maria Magurean

{"title":"(De-)Constructing Serbian Russophilia In The Context Of The Crisis In Ukraine","authors":"Eugenia-Maria Magurean","doi":"10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.04","url":null,"abstract":"On the background of the Ukrainian crisis, the relations between Russia and the Euro-Atlantic community reach a new critical point. The article aims to follow the way in which this tension unfolds in the Serbian society. It starts with identifying the types of discourses related to the idea of „friendship/ brotherhood” between Serbia and Russia. The selection of discourses is composed of statements belonging to officials from Belgrade, the political parties and the civil society. Using the poststructuralist approach, this study starts from the idea that international relations and a state’s foreign policy are strongly connected with the meanings attached to concepts or ideas. Such meanings are not given by a certain objective historical evolution, but can be constructed or deconstructed by the political, intellectual, social elites within a community. The discourses, collected from the November 2013 – April 2016 period, will be analysed with the Foucauldian Discourse Analysis method. Firstly, we will see how the idea of friendship between Serbia and Russia is constructed or deconstructed by several selected elite groups (how the different discourses are organized) and secondly, if the particular types of discourses imply certain specific foreign policy positions, justified by the elites as being directly linked. Conclusions indicate that Russophilia is a powerful legitimization tool, even in a context where this approach creates missed opportunities. On the contrary, emotional arguments prevail and strictly rational foreign policy decisions can be easily antagonized as breaking the norms of good international behaviour.","PeriodicalId":40359,"journal":{"name":"Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73900936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The European Energy Policy – A Framework For Decreasing The Gap Between Member States. Is The Energy Market Liberalization A Sustainable Approach Or An Ongoing Risk? 欧洲能源政策-减少成员国之间差距的框架。能源市场自由化是一个可持续的途径还是一个持续的风险?

Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance Pub Date : 2017-06-30 DOI: 10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.07

Andrada Văsii

{"title":"The European Energy Policy – A Framework For Decreasing The Gap Between Member States. Is The Energy Market Liberalization A Sustainable Approach Or An Ongoing Risk?","authors":"Andrada Văsii","doi":"10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25019/EUROPOLITY.2017.11.1.07","url":null,"abstract":"Energy independence was a long-time dream of European Member States, thus numerous regulations and actions were designed specific for its implementation. In a society characterized by constant evolution, energy independence is regarded as a proof of the existence of coherent supranational strategies, but also as a necessary effort that is to be unravelled at national level. Unlike the first actions in the energy sector, the current market is the expression of a competitive space that has adapted an approach depending upon efficiency and sustainability. In this paper, I present, using a macro-level approach, the transformations of the European energy market and the challenges that arise. I examine both the actions that lead to the liberalization efforts, as well as the disparities that characterize the Member States involved in this process. Therefore, I question the process of liberalization of the energy market as being a straight-forward one and I investigate the variables (such as types of energy and national energy strategies) that directly influence this process. This aim of this paper is to offer insights, using both a quantitative and a qualitative approach, in the way in which the liberalization process ought to occur, and elaborate on the country-specific factors that affect it, making liberalization a process characterized by vulnerabilities.","PeriodicalId":40359,"journal":{"name":"Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79179963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0