Valerio de Oliveira Mazzuoli, Gustavo de Faria Moreira Teixeira
{"title":"La protección jurídica del medio ambiente en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos","authors":"Valerio de Oliveira Mazzuoli, Gustavo de Faria Moreira Teixeira","doi":"10.31207/IH.V4I0.65","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V4I0.65","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the interconnections between environmental issues and the protection of human rights, in a process that began in the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm, 1972) and has been developed by the greening of the regional human rights systems. In the Inter-American system the article 11 of the Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 1988 — the Protocol of San Salvador — guarantees the right to a healthy environment. However the American Convention (on its arts. 3-25, 44-51 and 61-69) and its Additional Protocol (on its arts. 8, 13 and 19.6) only allow the submission of individual petitions to the Inter-American Commission and the possible acting of the Inter-American Court, in complaints containing alleged violations of civil and political rights, trade union rights and the right to education. Despite the lack of devices that are capable to ensure an effective protection to the right to a healthy environment, by itself, the Inter-American Court has demonstrated the greening of the human rights, which means, in other words, that it is quite possible to protect environmental issues by the demonstration of its interconnections with civil and political rights that are directly protected by the inter-American system. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the contributions of the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court in the strengthening of the civil and political rights in cases related to environmental issues.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"4 1","pages":"193-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2015-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69629704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La intangibilidad de las acciones privadas de las personas","authors":"Mauricio Maldonado Muñoz","doi":"10.31207/IH.V4I0.52","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V4I0.52","url":null,"abstract":"En este articulo pretendemos acercarnos a una garantia que —siguiendo cierta doctrina— hemos llamado: intangibilidad de las acciones privadas de las personas. Desde una vision que busca ser omnicomprensiva, se analizan las fuentes de las que mana la privacidad y, posteriormente, su contenido y alcances. Sobre todo, se analiza el problema de los limites de la injerencia y regulacion estatal, partiendo de una posicion que niega las visiones comunitaristas. En general, se trata de conceptualizar a la garantia planteada desde el punto de vista de la libertad, el derecho y las virtudes humanas, los derechos de terceros y la moral publica; concretando su vinculacion con otros derechos relacionados con la privacidad. La idea central del presente trabajo consiste en demostrar la transversalidad de la garantia senalada, implicando —en ese proceso— cuestiones trascendentes para la filosofia del derecho, la teoria del derecho y, por supuesto, para el estudio del derecho de los derechos humanos.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"151 1","pages":"9-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2014-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69629647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Análisis de la sentencia expedida por la Jueza 5a. de lo Civil en el caso \"El Gran Hermano\"","authors":"Santiago Guarderas Izquierdo","doi":"10.31207/IH.V3I0.46","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V3I0.46","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a brief analysis of the decision issued in the case known as “The Big Brother” with particular emphasis in the aspects in which the decision incurs in juridical errors. It departs from an objective revision which does not anticipate an opinion regarding the responsibility determined for defendants. On the contrary it is focused in those elements lessening merits to the decision and its grounds which are not consistent with the applicable juridical system, even independently from the main decision. Subjects such as the requirement of prejudication in matters of indemnity in case of damages derived from a crime, the nature of the liability of the co-perpetrator of a crime or quasi crime, the concept of the amount of repair in case of moral damages and its way of establishing the amount, the differences between moral damage and patrimonial damage and the necessity to use the method of carefully consideration in the events of conflict of rights are approached by the doctrine and jurisprudence with the occasion of the opinions issued by the judge trying the case in the decision. Even though the judgment was not executed since plaintiff abandoned the action, it disturbed the judicial spheres because of the litigating parties: the President of the Republic and two journalists.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"3 1","pages":"175-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2013-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69630092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"LA REGULACIÓN DEL DERECHO A LA INFORMACIÓN PÚBLICA EN MÉXICO","authors":"C. García","doi":"10.31207/IH.V3I0.35","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V3I0.35","url":null,"abstract":"This paper exposes the legal nature and the usefulness of the right to information, is special in the case of Mexico. So it will be a study of the right to public information, in order to understand its origin and utility; then analyze the establishment and evolution in Mexican positive and discover its use as a mechanism for transparent use of public resources and the accountability of the State authorities.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"3 1","pages":"113-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2013-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69629473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"El principio de razonabilidad y su aplicación al estudio de validez de las normas jurídicas","authors":"Mauricio Maldonado Muñoz","doi":"10.31207/IH.V3I0.40","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V3I0.40","url":null,"abstract":"This article approaches the principle of reasonableness from two perspectives. The first perspective attempts to explain the law —as a human order— in its valid content. The second perspective, which is a consequence of the first one, uses the principle as an interpretive method to determine the validity and constitutionality of legal rules, applying the sub-principles of adequacy, necessity and proportionality stricto sensu. Additionally, we have added an analysis of finality and of respect to the essential content of rights. In this sense, the principle of reasonableness is used as an interpretive method, that alludes to the anti-conflictivism theory of fundamental rights, which supports that conflicts of rights do not exist, and that, in fact, such a collision takes place only between interests or pretensions.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"3 1","pages":"139-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2013-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69630035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"EL DERECHO A LA VERDAD EN EL ÁMBITO IBEROAMERICANO","authors":"L. Gonzales","doi":"10.31207/IH.V3I0.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V3I0.26","url":null,"abstract":"This paper persued to establish the origin of the Right to the Truth in Latin America, after this, it describes the statements issued by the American Court of Human Rights on this important right and its reception by the principles contained in the American Convention on Human Rights and as the scope that comes giving; this work concludes with a brief discussion of the reception they have had the judgments of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Latinamerican Courts.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"3 1","pages":"9-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2012-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69629360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Riofrío, J.C. & Marín Sevilla, M. (2012). Régimen de competencia. Quito: CEP","authors":"D. Ortiz","doi":"10.31207/IH.V3I0.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V3I0.34","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a review of the competition regime works of various authors, published under the auspices of the University of the Hemispheres and the Corporation for Studies and Publications. Analyzes the structure, the general concepts, case law taken for development. Includes comments on the usefulness of this work for the study of competition law and the contribution to the lawyers who want to practice in this branch of economic law.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"3 1","pages":"221-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2012-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69629454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Razón y democracia: La potencial renovación del concepto de aristocracia","authors":"P. Izquierdo","doi":"10.31207/IH.V3I0.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V3I0.29","url":null,"abstract":"This article studies the relationship between different kinds of discussion and the roles that they play in the diverse institutions of modern representative democracy. It distinguishes between three kinds of discussion: Platonic dialectic, deliberation, and democratic debate, and places them on a scale of decreasing attunement to rational standards of decision-making. It is argued that the more discussions are attuned to rational standards, the less democratic they become, because the less they are in sync with the mode of discussion that is proper to, and that in fact obtains in the demos. This tension between rational decision-making and democracy is identified as the tension between aristocracy and democracy as it was understood by the vast tradition of political philosophy, and suggests a way in which aristocracy may be reintroduced as a meaningful concept in modern constitutional thought. It is argued that only by acknowledging the existence of an aristocratic quality to rational decision-making is it possible to truly preserve the democratic character of representative institutions.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"3 1","pages":"51-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2012-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69629404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Nulidad e Inexistencia de los Actos Jurídicos en el Derecho Ecuatoriano (II)","authors":"César Coronel Jones, Ó. Andrade","doi":"10.31207/IH.V2I0.134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V2I0.134","url":null,"abstract":"La inexistencia y la nulidad son instituciones fundamentales para el derecho privado ecuatoriano. Se trata de dos categorias distintas que tienen en comun perseguir la ineficacia de los actos que no se formaron de acuerdo a los parametros juridicos. Tratandose de actos inexistentes, la ley los priva de toda consecuencia juridica. Tratandose de actos nulos, la ley permite que un juez declare su invalidez y desconozca sus efectos. Este articulo revisa la regulacion legal de la inexistencia y la nulidad en el derecho ecuatoriano, asi como los pronunciamientos al respecto de la Corte Nacional de Justicia.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"3 1","pages":"77-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2011-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69629628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Hervada, J. (1981, 2001). Introducción crítica al derecho natural. Pamplona: EUNSA.","authors":"E. J. M. Cabrera","doi":"10.31207/IH.V2I0.31","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V2I0.31","url":null,"abstract":"La presente resena ofrece una comparacion entre las diferentes ediciones de la famosa obra de Hervada, aqui comentada. Del resultado de este analisis surgen cinco nuevas reglas hermeneuticas que analizan como debe interpretarse la ley positiva o el negocio juridico que eventualmente atente contra el derecho natural. Se evidencia tambien que los principios propuestos por Hervada son una buena base para la hermeneutica juridica general.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"2 1","pages":"235-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2011-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69629293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}