Herald of criminal justice最新文献

{"title":"Practical use artificial intelligence in criminal proceeding","authors":"O. Plakhotnik","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/45-57","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/45-57","url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence a set of scientific methods, theories and techniques whose aim is to reproduce, by a machine, the cognitive abilities of human beings. The artificial intelligence system is capable of using big data, calculating, evaluating, studying, deductive reasoning, abstract analysis and forecasting. The speed of information processing by artificial intelligence and its efficiency in making procedural decisions creates a model for digital automation of procedural decisions.\u0000\u0000The purpose of the article is to investigate the use of artificial intelligence in the judicial systems of developed countries and to analyze the prospects for its use in criminal proceedings in Ukraine.\u0000\u0000Such automation simplifies the process of making similar decisions in similar proceedings, which, of course, increases efficiency and simplifies procedural decision-making process in terms of procedural cost savings. Modern developments seek to ensure that machines perform complex tasks that were previously performed by humans. In the near future, accompanying organizational measures for the implementation of artificial intelligence and its regulatory support in public authorities associated with the storage of big data, processing information based on mathematical algorithms and making decisions based on artificial intelligence will be an integral part of our society. Artificial intelligence technologies are already being implemented in the judicial systems of China, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, France and Argentina. In the near future, the chances of using such technologies in the courts of general jurisdiction of Ukraine and in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine can be assessed as extremely high, and its scope is not limited to the work of artificial intelligence in court. You can also talk about the work of artificial intelligence in the activities of the prosecutor and the police. The paper deals with the use of artificial intelligence in the judicial systems of developed countries and analyzes the prospects of its use in criminal proceedings in Ukraine. These systems are reviewed, as: COMPAS (Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions) - United States of America, HART (Harm Assessment Risk Tool) - United Kingdom, Prometea - Argentina, Compulsory Similar Cases Search and Reporting Mechanism - China. The advantages of artificial intelligence systems are analyzed and a critique of their use is noted.","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115339795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Standard of proof «sufficient reason» in the criminal procedure of Ukraine","authors":"M. Pohoretskiy, O. Mitskan","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/31-42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/31-42","url":null,"abstract":"Based on the results of analysis of foreign doctrine, foreign procedural legislation, foreign law enforcement practice, the practice of the European Court of Human Rights.\u0000\u0000In the article explores problematic issues of the application of the standard of proof “sufficient reason” in the domestic criminal process.\u0000\u0000The relevance of the article is that the standard of proof “sufficient reason” or “probable cause” in the system of standard of proof in the domestic criminal process has a special place and using to accept most procedural decisions at the pre-trial investigation.\u0000\u0000The purpose of the article is to substantiation the main direction of using in the criminal proceed of Ukraine standard of proof “sufficient reason” taking into account the legal nature of this standard.\u0000\u0000In the article proved that “sufficient reason” is the standard of proof in the criminal proceed of Ukraine execution of which is based on “common sense” and in the factual analysis (assessment) of the whole set of facts and circumstance in their integrity, authorized entities with the use of special knowledges and experience on establishing “sufficient reason” for making appropriate procedural decision.\u0000\u0000Implementation of the standard of proof “sufficient reason” as well as “reasonable suspicion” doesn`t envisage a lack of doubt as guilty of the person. Sufficient is a possible knowledge about committing criminal offence by person with the difference that for the highest standard measures have to be higher. Moreover, within “flexible” standard of proof “sufficient reason” of the level of probability can also vary, depending on how much negatively appropriate procedural decision will affect the rights of the person.\u0000\u0000Prove that in the current Criminal procedural code of Ukraine the standard of proof “sufficient reason” is used to accept most procedural decisions at the pre-trial investigation stage in criminal proceedings, when the most reasonable suspicion of a committing person criminal offence is insufficient due to significant restrictions on human rights as a result of appropriate decision. At that, the flexible nature of the standard of evidence \"sufficient reason\", which consists in the required measure conviction the appropriate standard from the circumstances of the specific criminal proceedings, allows you to assert its suitability for Making a wide range of procedural decisions.\u0000\u0000Standard of proof “sufficient reason” is used for adoption of such procedural decisions: on the application of certain measures to ensure criminal proceedings; in addressing the issue of applying precautionary measures as a variety of measures to ensure criminal proceedings; in addressing the issue of individual investigative (detective) actions; in addressing the issue of granting permission for secret investigative (detective) actions and deciding on the use of the results of unspoken investigative actions in other criminal proceedings; when deciding on the placement of the person in the ","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"381-382 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125188813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The authority of Criminal Cassation Court as part of Supreme Court about sending criminal proceeding from one trial to another","authors":"N. Syza","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/51-61","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/51-61","url":null,"abstract":"One of the guaranties of justice by competitive trial is determined in art. 34 Criminal Procedural Code the procedure of sending criminal proceeding from one trial to another in connection with don`t fall within the jurisdiction or another legal circumstance which make impossible justice in this trial or can influence on judge`s impartiality and equity and for the purpose of providing for promptness and effectiveness in criminal proceeding.\u0000\u0000The purpose of article is: to reveal the authority of Criminal Cassation Court as a part of Supreme Court based on analysis of criminal procedural law and practice their using about sending criminal proceeding from one trial to another.\u0000\u0000For the results of research was concluding that the authority of Criminal Cassation Court as a part of Supreme Court about sending criminal proceeding from one trial to another steam from norm in art. 34 Criminal Procedural Code which provide for grounds and procedure for deciding whether to refer criminal proceedings to another court. If in a court of appeal or in a petition of a party or a victim the circumstances, which cannot be grounds for referring criminal proceedings to another court, are stated, or the request is made for resolving issues beyond its powers, stipulated by art. 34 of the Criminal Procedural Code, the Criminal Cassation Court as a part of Supreme Court refuses to grant the application (petition).\u0000\u0000Generalized the most common in judicial practice in the Criminal Cassation Court as a part of Supreme Court instances of refusal in satisfied submission (petition) about sending criminal proceeding from one trial to another, in particular if: appellant don`t have the authority; it`s matter of bringing criminal proceeding together and determining jurisdiction; substantiates the existence of circumstances that may be grounds for the removal of judges, but not for the transfer of criminal proceedings in accordance with art. 34 of the Criminal Procedural Code.\u0000\u0000Installed that Criminal Cassation Court as a part of Supreme Court at proceeding application (petition) about sending criminal proceeding from one trial to another refuses to satisfy them even in case where the issue of jurisdiction of criminal proceeding has already been resolved by the cassation court before, on similar grounds, justifying it in accordance with the requirement of p.5 art. 34 of the Criminal Procedural Code, disputes over jurisdiction between the courts are not allowed.\u0000\u0000Was figuring out the legal positions Criminal Cassation Court as a part of Supreme Court about limit in view to considering in art. 34 Criminal Procedural Code; questions about sending criminal proceeding from one trial to another which has already been submitted to a certain court, having carried out during the court residence. Having proposed for broad consideration of the matter, having entrusted the court to provide the Criminal Procedural Code with special procedures sending of criminal proceeding from one side to the","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114491449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Information and information technology as an integral part of a lawyer’s professional activity","authors":"Y. Bysaga, V. Zaborovskyy, V. Manzyuk","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/104-114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/104-114","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, an analysis theoretical and applied issues related to the realization by a lawyer of his professional rights, aimed at the formation of a proper and admissible base of evidentiary information, as well as the need to use modern information technologies in the lawyer's activity.\u0000\u0000The purpose of article is reserching the nature of interaction of information and information technologies and professional activity of a lawyer, in particular, through the prism of the use of advanced information technologies in advocacy.\u0000\u0000In the process of discovering the subject of the research, both the authors of the study used a set of general scientific and special methods, which are characteristic of legal science, both to achieve the purpose of the work and to ensure the scientific objectivity, completeness, reliability and convincing of the obtained results. In particular, with the help of the system-structural method, the general structure of scientific research was formed, which provided the fullest disclosure and solution of the tasks posed to the authors. The dialectical method of knowledge of legal reality provided an opportunity to analyze the different types of information technologies used in the professional activity of a lawyer. General scientific methods of analysis and synthesis have been widely used in the scientific article. The method of systematic analysis, which is one of the main methods of this study, made it possible to achieve the goals and tasks set by the authors, and the synthesis method was used in the construction of the author's conclusions and other theoretical provisions.\u0000\u0000It is necessary that the multidimensionality of professional activity of the lawyer, namely protection, representation and provision of other types of legal assistance, determines and use of various information technologies in the business of everyday professional activities.\u0000\u0000Based on the research, it is concluded that information and information technology is an important part of a lawyer's professional activity, the effectiveness of which depends largely on the level of information support of the latter and the ability to use it. The general features of the most common types of information technologies used in the lawyer's activity are revealed, namely: reference and legal systems, information (automated) systems, unified and state registers, Internet, technical devices and programs, etc.","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129985795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The scientific opinion about legality of the implementation of the authority of the investigative department by head of the National police as a head of pre-trial investigation","authors":"M. Pohoretskyi, O. Starenkyi","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/185-192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/185-192","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134421334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Appeal of report of suspicion during the pre-trial investigation","authors":"N. Glynska, D. Klepka","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/17-32","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/17-32","url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important criminal procedural decisions is the notice of suspicion which is essential both for the criminal proceeding as a whole and for the person to whom this message is made. Therefore, compliance with the legality and validity of the notice of suspicion is important in the general mechanism of effective solution of the tasks of criminal proceedings, in particular, regarding appealing the notice of suspicion during the pre-trial detention investigation.\u0000\u0000On bases of the case-law analysis, a number of issues have been highlighted in connection with the appeal of report of suspicion during the pre-trial investigation.\u0000\u0000The purpose of the article is to cover the gaps and conflicts of the current criminal procedural legislation in the regulation of appealing the report of suspicion during the pre-trial investigation.\u0000\u0000The authors summarized the case law on consideration of complaints about suspected reports during the pre-trial investigation, which allowed to identify 3 variants of interpretation by the investigating judges of the «suspicion report» as a subject of appeal: 1. the subject of the appeal is only the procedure for the report of suspicion; 2. the subject of the appeal is only the report of suspicion as a procedural decision; 3. The subject of the appeal is the written report of suspicion as a procedural decision and the procedure for the implementation of the report of suspicion. It is justified that the third approach is correct. The authors support the view of the complex nature of the notion of suspicion. Particular attention is paid to the issue of challenging the validity of the suspicion report. In the article the practice of investigating judges who refuse to open proceedings on a complaint about the validity of a suspected report is evaluated critically. On the basis of the practice of ECtHR, the authors conclude that the validity of a suspicion report may be may be the subject of an appeal during the pre-trial investigation in view of the insufficiency of the evidence on which it is based. In addition, it is concluded that the appeal of the suspicion report is ineffective after two months from the bottom of the report of the suspected in crime and one month after the report of the suspected in offense.\u0000\u0000On the basis of the conducted research, the authors proposed to amend the current CPC in order to improve the regulatory framework for appealing the suspected report during the pre-trial investigation.","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128944730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Peculiarities of negotiating by a barrister during reconciliation within pre-trial investigation","authors":"A. Kovalchuk","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/147-153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/147-153","url":null,"abstract":"So far, the current legislation provides the parties of the criminal proceedings for the right of reconciliation. Moreover, the Criminal and Criminal Procedure Codes provide for grounds, participants, stages of the reconciliation process. Nevertheless, the most crucial point for attainment of peace between the parties are direct negotiations of the victim and suspected person or defendant. It is logical that legislator doesn’t set limits and make recommendations upon negotiating process.\u0000\u0000The purpose of the article is to identify the main stages of negotiation with a view to reconciling the suspect and the victim in the pre-trial investigation and outlining known negotiation techniques that may be helpful to the lawyer in the process of communication between the parties in the context of reconciliation.\u0000\u0000It is stated, that the barrister is an irreplaceable member of the negotiating process during reconciliation within criminal proceedings. He can not only legally qualify the parties` interests, but also, based on his own experience and scientific awareness, can help achieve effective results of the negotiations. Meanwhile, the author justifies the necessity of additional awareness of the barrister with respect to negotiating and psychology aimed at speeding up of negotiations and establish contact with each party and between the parties.\u0000\u0000It is determined that the knowledge of classical communication techniques and the research of new communication techniques will increase the level\u0000of negotiation efficiency and, as a consequence, the successful resolution\u0000of conflicts. Given that reconciliation negotiations are often considered successful when satisfy the interests of all parties, development of communication skills based on the above mentioned techniques will help to reach consensus.\u0000\u0000The author seeks to analysis of the familiar negotiating techniques and making predictions about the implementation of theories within criminal procedural practice as well as illustration of the causal link between the lawyer's negotiating skills and the parties' possible reactions.\u0000\u0000The stage of the negotiation process is illustrated, taking into account the following categories: personal characteristics of the parties, the preparatory process, tactics and techniques of communication and feedback of the parties.","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134621872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Procedure for exemption from punishment on the ground of legal act on decriminalization provided","authors":"A. Chugaievska","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/72-80","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/72-80","url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of the criminal procedure for exemption from punishment on the ground of legal act on decriminalization provided; analysis of current status of the problem provided; the key problems and legislative gaps identified, and respective solutions developed. The study revealed that the procedure for exemption from the court-sentenced punishment on the ground of legal act on decriminalization provided, has no sufficiently and precise regulations in the criminal procedural legislation.\u0000\u0000The goal of research is analyzing procedural order of exemption person from appointed sentence of court for action, the punishment of which is eliminated by law, identifying a range of problems which connects with procedural order of exemptions from the sentence imposed in connection with adoption of the law which eliminates the criminal act and amendment of improving current criminal procedural legislation.\u0000\u0000In the framework of the analysis of the recent studies, researches and respective publications it has been examined the current status of the scientific researches of the issues on exemption from the court-sentenced punishment on the ground of legal act on decriminalization provided (part 2 of the Article 74 of the Criminal Code). The grounded conclusion reads that that the procedure for this type of exemption from the court-sentenced punishment is insufficiently studied.\u0000\u0000Within the framework of implementing the tasks on analyzing the procedure for exemption from the court-sentenced punishment on the ground of legal act on decriminalization provided, detection a range of issues related to the procedure for exemption from the court-sentenced punishment on the ground of legal act on decriminalization provided and contributing recommendations for improvement of the current criminal procedural legislation, the following conclusions and recommendations were proposed.\u0000\u0000In particular, the application of of legal act on decriminalization at the criminal proceedings does not require a specific regulations. However, the general procedure for examining issues while executing a sentence requires taking into account specific cases of exemption from court-sentenced punishment. \u0000\u0000The ensuring of the prescribed by the Part 2 of Art. 74 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine \"immediate\" release of a person from a punishment sentenced by a court, should be supported by improving the procedural terms of consideration of the petition for release and introduction of a separate regulations.\u0000\u0000It is recommended to implement into the procedure a list of grounds (issues) that the court must consider during a trial and resolving the issue of release from punishment on the ground of legal act on decriminalization provided. In addition, it is appropriate in our opinion to oblige the court in deciding whether to release a person from punishment on the ground of legal act on decriminalization provided, while applying the exemption from punishment under Part 2 of Art. 74 of the Criminal Code of U","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117010774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Significance of violations of the procedural criminal form, as a condition for the admission of evidence to be inadmissible","authors":"V. Vapnyarchuk","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/8-16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/8-16","url":null,"abstract":"The development of the science of the domestic criminal process necessitates the study and revision of traditional scientific views on particular problems of criminal procedural evidence. One of the most important in the theory of evidence is the problem of the admissibility of evidence, and in particular the question of the legal consequences of a breach of the procedural form of the taking of evidence (forming the evidentiary basis of the legal position of the subject of evidence) in criminal proceedings. In scientific publications, these issues are given considerable attention. However, there is no clear-cut approach to solving it. Therefore, expressing your own position on their decision is quite important and necessary. It is these circumstances that explain the need for this article, its logic and content.\u0000\u0000The purpose of the article is to investigate the legal consequences of violating the procedural form of taking evidence (forming the evidentiary basis of the legal position of the subject of proof) in criminal proceedings.\u0000\u0000The results of the scientific elaboration of the author of the aforementioned problem were the conclusions on different approaches to the question of the legal consequences of violation of the procedural form of obtaining evidence. In particular, the opinion, supported and additionally substantiated in the scientific literature, that they depend on the materiality of the violation. Substantial violations entail the admission of the evidence obtained inadmissible, although they can be overcome by the means specified by law. Non-essential violations after their neutralization do not affect the admissibility of the evidence.\u0000\u0000It is proposed to regulate the criminal procedural legislation of the Institute of Extreme need in criminal proceedings and scientific development of the procedure for its application.\u0000\u0000It`s indicated that when decidind on the abmissibility of evidence obtained by using coercion (which can be qualified as a non-substantial violation of the rights and freedoms of the person to which it is used), it`s necessary to establish: firstly: firstly, their character (surmountable or irresistible) (in this connection it is necessary to determine the degree of its impact on the person, its individual physical abilities, the mental state in which it was found, etc.); secondly, the possibility of using the Institute of Extreme Necessity (subject to its regulation in the criminal procedural legislation).","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116474069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Scientific and consultative opinion on the conformity to the legislation of the provision of the contest for enjoyable activities post of the High Qualification Commission member of judges of Ukraine","authors":"O. Khotynska-Nor","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/193-200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/193-200","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130210142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}