{"title":"Complementary Pathways at the Crossroads Between Migration and Asylum: Enhancing or Diluting the International Refugee Regime?","authors":"Emiliya Bratanova van Harten","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdaf015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdaf015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Complementary pathways present a legally sound case for an interrogation of the distinction between migration and asylum, as they test the foundations of the international refugee regime and its key principles. Are complementary pathways enhancing the protection of refugees or diluting it? This analysis contributes to a discussion on the intersection between migration and asylum (the “migration–asylum nexus”). It takes three examples of pathways to Spain to illustrate this nexus: a labour mobility pathway, a combined resettlement and labour mobility pathway and an education mobility pathway. The cases show that if complementary pathways are designed to target refugees recognised as such in the receiving country, there is no risk of not addressing their protection needs. On the contrary, if the residence status of the beneficiaries of these pathways is not protection based, the result could be that their protection needs may not be taken into account. Ultimately, if beneficiaries of complementary pathways enjoy lower levels of protection than refugees, a serious question about the desirability of complementary pathways is posed. However, depending on their legal and policy design, complementary pathways may avoid some of the pitfalls resulting from the blurring of the refugee/migrant distinction and enhance the international refugee regime.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"44 4","pages":"469-494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://academic.oup.com/rsq/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/rsq/hdaf015/64957508/hdaf015.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147896451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Refugee Sponsorship’s Unrealised Objectives and Unanticipated Benefits: A New Perspective on the Meaning of “Complementary” Pathways?","authors":"Kate Ogg","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdaf016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdaf016","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article adds new knowledge to sponsorship literature by uniquely examining sponsorship’s potential to deliver systemic benefits to the international refugee protection regime. While there are myriad sponsorship actors with manifold motivations, this article draws on an empirical study to show that civil society organisations are the most likely actors to support sponsorship for its capacity to strengthen refugee protection systems. I argue that sponsorship has facilitated systemic benefits but not in the ways civil society envisaged. Civil society aims to use sponsorship to significantly increase resettlement numbers and shift the national electorate’s attitudes to refugees from hostile to welcoming to place pressure on governments to adopt more compassionate refugee policies. However, these outcomes have not been achieved and are unlikely to manifest because sponsorship is not significantly scaling and, in some countries, is stagnating or declining. Nevertheless, sponsorship has had unanticipated benefits for refugee protection systems. Sponsorship has provided resettlement for refugee populations that otherwise have no access to resettlement, strengthened civil society enabling more effective advocacy for refugees and introduced a unique state-citizen infrastructure for resisting anti-refugee violence. These findings provide new perspectives on the meaning of “complementarity” in defining and debating the role of complementary pathways.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"44 4","pages":"495-523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147901142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Invisibilised Labour of Diasporas as Co-sponsors in Refugee Sponsorship: Lessons <i>From</i> Canada","authors":"Biftu Yousuf","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdae024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae024","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For almost 45 years, civil society groups have volunteered their time, energy, and finances to resettle more than 327,000 refugees through Canada’s Private Sponsorship of Refugees programme. Sponsorships are commonly arranged by local communities, faith-based organisations, or private citizens who have entered into agreements with the federal government. Much of this effort is supported by former refugees who were themselves resettled to Canada. Yet, the existing literature underrepresents the crucial role of sponsors with refugee histories. This research examines the previously invisibilised labour of diasporic sponsors, highlighting the unique and vital role stemming from their dual social locations as former refugees and private sponsors. Through participant testimony from in-depth, semi-structured interviews and triangulated document analysis of policy and programmatic data, this research finds that invisibilisation lies at the administrative level of sponsorship processes. This includes the interactions between Sponsorship Agreement Holders and co-sponsor mechanisms, and how formalised and less formalised processes play out. The co-sponsorship model illuminates the nuances and possibilities for sponsorship sustainability beyond the courte durée, emphasising the vital labour of diasporic sponsors in this dynamic.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"44 1","pages":"143-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://academic.oup.com/rsq/article-pdf/44/1/143/61371432/hdae024.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147915334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Challenge of Evaluating the Impact of NGOs on the Human Capital and Life Satisfaction of Syrian Refugees in Turkey","authors":"Ayşe Perihan Kırkıç","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdae011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae011","url":null,"abstract":"The number of projects designed by non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to meet refugees’ needs in Turkey has steadily increased since the arrival of Syrian refugees. In existing studies, the projects of NGOs working with Syrian refugees have not been evaluated from a lens of human capital and life satisfaction. Given the crucial role of NGOs in implementing social policies within host countries, it becomes imperative to conduct thorough analyses of the effects of their projects on the target groups. The objective of this study is to evaluate the significance of human capital and life satisfaction within NGO projects, as perceived by NGO employees. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with national and international NGO representatives in Istanbul to probe the impact of the projects on Syrian refugees. Based on the findings, despite the considerable number of projects carried out with Syrian refugees, the absence of a dedicated methodology to measure changes in participants’ human capital and life satisfaction poses significant challenges in evaluating project outcomes. In this research, I propose a five-step method for assessing the impacts of NGO-applied projects. This method acknowledges existing limitations and promotes the improvement of the evaluation process.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142215405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Where is Home?” Perceptions of Home and Future among Ukrainian Refugees in Norway","authors":"Deineko Oleksandra, Aadne Aasland","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdae010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae010","url":null,"abstract":"This article illuminates how Ukrainian refugees residing in Norway perceive “home” in spatial and temporal dimensions. By synthesising the “here and there” dichotomy with the concept of “home constellations”, the authors elaborate a theoretical scheme illustrating the nuanced and multifaceted notions of home that emerged during interviews conducted with Ukrainian refugees in Norway in 2022–2023. The variety of home notions reveals at least four possible scenarios of interactions between “home A” and “home B”: (1) Home “where I am from” (home A in Ukraine); (2) Home “where I am now” (home B in Norway); (3) Double home (both home A and home B); (4) Absence of home (no home). This article shows that Ukrainian refugees’ “homing desire” to create, feel, and believe in a home existing in the present serves to overcome the multilevel uncertainties of the future caused by the temporary nature of collective protection and the unknown prospects of a safe return to their homeland.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142215325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Recognising Palestinian Refugees: Applicability of Article 1D of the 1951 Refugee Convention in Turkey","authors":"Hasan Basri Bülbül","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdae009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae009","url":null,"abstract":"The special international regime for Palestinian refugees established by Article 1D of the 1951 Refugee Convention has yet to receive sufficient attention in Turkish asylum literature. Although Turkish law has incorporated Article 1D, neither scholars nor practitioners have pushed for its implementation. This research contends that Palestinians should be recognised as refugees in Turkey. Despite Turkey only granting refugee status to individuals from Europe due to the Convention’s geographical limitation, this article argues that an exception should be made for Palestinians. To this end, this article addresses how Article 1D of the 1951 Refugee Convention applies in Turkey by focusing on the interplay between the Convention and Turkish laws and regulations, as well as considering recent case law in other jurisdictions, particularly in Europe. By doing so, it aims to demonstrate that it is possible, though challenging, to improve the legal status of Palestinians in Turkey, mainly through strategic litigation.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142215377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Wanted Refugees: The Forming of an Instrument Constituency for Refugee Resettlement in the European Union","authors":"Johan Ekstedt, Andreas Asplèn Lundstedt","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdae006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae006","url":null,"abstract":"The European Union Agency for Asylum has emerged as an important actor in the Common European Asylum System in the past few years. In this article, we explore how the agency engages in capacity-building by looking at the development of bureaucratic instruments. We deploy the theoretical framework of instrument constituencies to investigate the agency’s development of instruments around resettlement. In relation to the literature on European migration management, deploying the theoretical framework of instrument constituencies is a novel approach. Given the European Union’s limited mandate to directly influence Member States resettlement programmes, we argue that the development of bureaucratic instruments is one of the few avenues through which the European Union can facilitate resettlement. This study reveals how the proliferation in the use of these instruments by Member State authorities is driven by a political ambition to create a more orderly form of migration and is contrasted with the seemingly uncontrollable nature of asylum. Beyond being a direct solution to a practical problem, the policy instruments studied here reveal how new bureaucratic practices around resettlement are gradually being established. We show how resettlement is continuously evolving in the intersection between Member States and the European Union in the governing of migration.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140560108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Plaintiff S99: Rewriting Refugee Law Through a Trauma-Informed Lens","authors":"Jessica Hambly, Neeraja Sanmuhanathan","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdae003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae003","url":null,"abstract":"Plaintiff S99/2016 v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 483 was a decision of the Australian Federal Court concerning a woman (referred to in the decision as “Plaintiff S99”) who had been recognised as a refugee in the Republic of Nauru, having been transferred there by Australia under an offshore processing agreement. The decision in Plaintiff S99 established an important precedent that many refugees and asylum-seekers in Australia’s offshore processing centres on Manus and Nauru, including children with severe health problems, subsequently relied upon to be transferred to Australia for critical medical care. Drawing on the recent turn towards trauma-informed practice across other areas of law and policy, we ask: what does this mean for refugees, and, more specifically, what does this mean for judgment writing in refugee law? We use our rewrite of Plaintiff S99 to highlight aspects of the decision and its legacy that continue to silence and erase the experiences of refugees, especially refugee women, and frequently contribute to compounding their trauma. Our contribution calls for a reorientation towards “do no harm” principles, which lie at the heart of trauma and violence-informed practice. In particular, our approach to rewriting S99 aims at foregrounding dignity and safety, promoting respect for physical and mental health, and centring the voice, experience, and longer-term protection needs of refugees.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140560110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Temporality of Intimate Partner Violence – How an Understanding of Time and Gendered Threats Can Foster Protection-Positive Outcomes","authors":"Sharelle Aitchison","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdae002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae002","url":null,"abstract":"This article brings together temporality and gender in the refugee process and examines how refugee determination bodies and courts have interpreted gendered threats, as a specific form of intimate partner violence. A case law review of jurisdictions (that include Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the UK) is conducted, revealing a flawed temporal phenomenon where decision-makers have focused primarily on the exogenous aspect of threats, namely, whether there is a real chance of a threat being actuated in the future, and have largely failed to assess the endogenous, psychological dimension of the threat, that encompasses past, present, and future aspects of time. The practice of treating threats of violence as a potential future harm rather than an already occurring harm exhibits an obvious privileging of the future over the present that is not rooted in the empirical evidence on intimate partner violence. Further, the predominant focus by decision-makers on isolated future events as harm fails to accommodate the broad temporal dimensions of systemic intimate partner violence, best suited to a predicament-based model of being persecuted. This article explores the temporal shortcomings and gendered interpretations that underpin this erroneous practice in case law, finding that the temporal governance of refugee law is still largely shaped by the male gaze and conceptualisations of masculinity and femininity, which contributes to the limited recognition of threats as a form of harm in themselves.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140025967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to: When Legal Inclusion is not Enough: the “Uganda Model” of Refugee Protection on the Brink of Failure","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdad026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdad026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139174816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}