Business and Politics最新文献_第6页

Can We Talk About Pay Discrimination/Equal Pay/Strategic Compensation Practices? An Exploratory Study on Framing Gender Pay Inequity 我们可以谈论薪酬歧视/同工同酬/战略薪酬实践吗?性别薪酬不平等框架的探索性研究

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2023-01-20 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.21

Amber N. W. Raile, C. Austin, Virginia K. Bratton

引用次数: 0

An examination of legality of global abortion services and the genesis of public policy 审查全球堕胎服务的合法性和公共政策的起源

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.23

Laurel A. Steinfield, Girish Ramani, R. Hill, Rehana Paul

引用次数: 0

Lobbying the executive branch: Unpacking access to political heads, political advisers, and civil servants 游说行政部门:打开接触政治领袖、政治顾问和公务员的渠道

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.22

Adrià Albareda, Á. Saz-Carranza, Michiel Van Acoleyen, D. Coen

引用次数: 1

BAP volume 24 issue 4 Cover and Front matter BAP第24卷第4期封面和封面问题

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-21 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.20

引用次数: 0

The US–China Trade War: Economic Statecraft, Multinational Corporations, and Public Opinion 中美贸易战:经济治国方略、跨国公司和公众舆论

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.18

Shiping Hua, K. Zeng

{"title":"The US–China Trade War: Economic Statecraft, Multinational Corporations, and Public Opinion","authors":"Shiping Hua, K. Zeng","doi":"10.1017/bap.2022.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2022.18","url":null,"abstract":"The United States and China have been embroiled in what Beijing has called the “biggest trade war in economic history” since early 2018, when Washington imposed punitive tariffs on Chinese products to challenge perceived unfair Chinese practices, prompting Beijing to retaliate with its own tariffs on US exports to China. The trade war was not an independent event, but part of a broader effort initiated by the Trump administration to confront serious challenges from China in not only the economic but also the political and security realms. The trade war has had a tremendous impact on global economic activities and geopolitical relations. Although the two sides reached a partial truce in January 2020 with the signing of the Phase One trade agreement, the conflict is far from over. The enormous political and economic differences between the two countries have impacted and will likely continue to impact how the trade war will play out in the future. This special issue explores the politics of the US–China trade war, focusing on economic statecraft, the role of multinational corporations in the dispute, and public opinion toward the trade war. The introduction to the special issue first provides an overview of the origins of the US–China trade war and surveys existing literature on this topic. It then proceeds to highlight the key themes and contributions of the issue and concludes by identifying questions for future research.","PeriodicalId":39749,"journal":{"name":"Business and Politics","volume":"27 1","pages":"319 - 331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86656586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The US chamber and chambers of commerce respond to Black Lives Matter: Cheap talk, progressive neoliberalism, or transformative change? 美国商会和商会对“黑人的命也重要”的回应:廉价言论，进步的新自由主义，还是变革?

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2022-10-17 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.17

Daniel Kinderman

{"title":"The US chamber and chambers of commerce respond to Black Lives Matter: Cheap talk, progressive neoliberalism, or transformative change?","authors":"Daniel Kinderman","doi":"10.1017/bap.2022.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2022.17","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the responses of the US Chamber of Commerce and state- and local-level chambers of commerce to Black Lives Matter (BLM). The US Chamber of Commerce's Equality of Opportunity Initiative stresses the business case for racial equity and the economic benefits that can be attained by overcoming race-related inequalities. Many chambers are adopting racially progressive positions, often at some cost to themselves. This article contributes a typology of stances and actions and draws on interviews with American business leaders to characterize American business organization responses to BLM. There is some movement beyond a progressive neoliberal vision of nondiscrimination to acknowledge that it is necessary to “level the playing field.” And the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives of state- and regional-level chambers suggest that they are making genuine and, in some cases, bold and meaningful attempts to advance the cause of racial equity. The evidence suggests that popular mobilization and social pressure following George Floyd's brutal murder played a critical role in enabling this progress. However, the parallels and similarities between current chamber and business DEI efforts and business stances in the tumultuous 1960s and 1970s raise the question: Can current efforts succeed where previous efforts have failed?","PeriodicalId":39749,"journal":{"name":"Business and Politics","volume":"48 1","pages":"491 - 516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86383322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

How promise breaking in trade rhetoric shapes attitudes toward bilateral US-China trade cooperation 贸易言论中的毁约如何影响对中美双边贸易合作的态度

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.16

Tanja Schweinberger

{"title":"How promise breaking in trade rhetoric shapes attitudes toward bilateral US-China trade cooperation","authors":"Tanja Schweinberger","doi":"10.1017/bap.2022.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2022.16","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The ongoing trade war between the United States and China represents one of the most severe deteriorations of trade cooperation in modern times. In this context, the ferocious trade rhetoric accusing China of breaking promises in trade policy is striking. A previously unexamined question in this context arises: How does this rhetoric shape individual attitudes toward bilateral trade cooperation? My analysis of original survey experiments from the United States and China (n = 4181) suggests that this type of rhetoric has important ramifications. Experimental evidence from both countries suggests that individuals react more strongly to rhetoric emphasizing negative than positive past behaviour of the trading partner. Overall, this pattern prevails independently of the identity of the trading partner. Promise-breaking trade narratives, a key contextual dimension of the US-China trade war, diminish the perceived level of trustworthiness of the other country. A conjoint analysis suggests that individuals’ trade cooperation attitudes are also shaped by rhetoric targeting issue areas beyond trade, such as military affairs and human rights. These findings highlight the importance of contextual factors accompanying the US-China trade war context. Thereby, this article emphasizes the potential for political elites to effectively leverage fundamental individual fairness principles for invigorating opposition to open trading relations.","PeriodicalId":39749,"journal":{"name":"Business and Politics","volume":"32 1","pages":"463 - 490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85136799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

US economic statecraft and great power competition 美国经济策略与大国竞争

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.19

James Lee, Richard A. Maher

{"title":"US economic statecraft and great power competition","authors":"James Lee, Richard A. Maher","doi":"10.1017/bap.2022.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2022.19","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article develops a conceptual framework for explaining variation in the United States’ economic statecraft in the Cold War and the present day, focusing on how US officials perceived the type of geoeconomic capability that its rivals possessed and the type of national security challenge that they posed. This framework specifies four ideal-type strategies on the part of the United States: economic containment, national economic competition, technological containment, and national technological competition. Analyses of U.S. strategy toward the Soviet Union, China, and Japan support the theory. These ideal types explain why, in the rivalry with Japan in the 1980s, the United States openly engaged in competition but did not adopt containment, relying on Voluntary Export Restraints, currency devaluation agreements, and bilateral semiconductor agreements rather than placing Japan on something historically analogous to the Commerce Department's contemporary Entity List or targeting Japan with comprehensive export controls through an institution like CoCom. These ideal types (and the theory behind them) also explain why the United States has implemented containment measures against specific Chinese companies but has not pursued a systematic “decoupling” of the US and Chinese economies.","PeriodicalId":39749,"journal":{"name":"Business and Politics","volume":"118 1","pages":"332 - 347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86201112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Protection forestall: Offshore firms against tariffs in their own industry 保护性垄断:离岸公司在自己的行业中对抗关税

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.15

Jieun Lee, Iain Osgood

引用次数: 2

BAP volume 24 issue 3 Cover and Front matter BAP第24卷第3期封面和封面问题

IF 1.8 3区社会学

Business and Politics Pub Date : 2022-08-19 DOI: 10.1017/bap.2022.12

引用次数: 0