Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies最新文献_第9页

Rivals in Arms: Sino-U.S. Cooperation, Problems, and Solutions and Their Impact on the International UAV Industry 武器上的对手:中美合作、问题、解决方案及其对国际无人机产业的影响

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-08-25 DOI: 10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.2.0729

Bei-Er Cheok

{"title":"Rivals in Arms: Sino-U.S. Cooperation, Problems, and Solutions and Their Impact on the International UAV Industry","authors":"Bei-Er Cheok","doi":"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.2.0729","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.2.0729","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Research and development into drone technology has exploded in the United States in the recent decades. From the operation of killer drones in the military to agricultural survey drones in farms, the proliferation of drone technology is well on its way to radically altering the American future. However, there remains numerous laws, policies, and regulations that place stifling restrictions on drone development and operations in America. Halfway across the world, China has also begun to experience the \"drone revolution,\" but with its relatively laxer laws regarding both commercial and public drone operations and manufacturing, it seems poised to surpass the United States in not only drone R&D, but drone export as well. In recent years, China has expanded to become \"a prolific developer and no-questions-asked exporter of UAVs\" selling to a plethora of nations ranging from Saudi Arabia to Pakistan and Nigeria. Domestically, China has relied firmly on indigenous production and R&D since the 1980s to expand its UAV technologies, expanding its UAV industry to include a variety of defense firms as well as academic research groups. However, China's drone program is not without its own issues and setbacks, forcing the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) to issue new drone regulations to be implemented on a trial basis. This paper will analyze and compare the two comprehensive UAV regulations—the stricter FAA regulations and the newer UAV regulations promulgated by the CAAC—and explore the differences between the two regulatory policies (both commercial and military), their benefits and drawbacks, and attempt to present solutions as to how the CAAC and the FAA can help build an initial framework for other nations to follow.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"729 - 754"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48678976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

America's Past-time and the Art of Diplomacy 美国的过去与外交艺术

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-08-25 DOI: 10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.2.0797

Alyson St. Pierre

引用次数: 0

Globalization: The Next 25 Years 全球化:未来25年

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-08-25 DOI: 10.2979/indjglolegstu.25.2.0565

Alfred C. Aman

引用次数: 0

The Inevitable United States Adoption of IFRS: How and Why the United States Should Be Prepared 美国不可避免地采用《国际财务报告准则》：美国应该如何以及为什么做好准备

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-08-25 DOI: 10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.2.0817

Erika M. Tribuzi

引用次数: 2

Marching to the Beat of the EU's Drum: Refining the Collective Management of Music Rights in the United States to Facilitate the Growth of Interactive Streaming 跟随欧盟的鼓点前进:完善美国音乐版权的集体管理，促进互动流媒体的发展

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-08-25 DOI: 10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.2.0755

Garfield Hunt

引用次数: 1

Authority and the Globalisation of Inclusion and Exclusion: Author Meets Readers 权威与包容与排斥的全球化:作者与读者的相遇

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-08-24 DOI: 10.1017/9781316819203

H. Lindahl

引用次数: 61

Digital Weberianism: Bureaucracy, Information, and the Techno-rationality of Neoliberal Capitalism 数字网络主义：官僚主义、信息与新自由资本主义的技术理性

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-12 DOI: 10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0187

Chris Muellerleile, S. Robertson

{"title":"Digital Weberianism: Bureaucracy, Information, and the Techno-rationality of Neoliberal Capitalism","authors":"Chris Muellerleile, S. Robertson","doi":"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0187","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The social infrastructures that constitute both public and private administration are increasingly entangled with digital code, big data, and algorithms. While some argue these technologies have blown apart the strictures of bureaucratic order, we see more subtle changes at work. We suggest that far from a radical rupture, in today's digitizing society, there are strong traces of the logic and techniques of Max Weber's bureau; a foundational concept in his account of the symbiotic relationship between modernity, capitalism, and social order. We suggest the manner through which these techniques have shaped contemporary systems of social administration helps explain the remarkable legitimacy digital governance has acquired. We do this by exploring how digital technologies draw from, and give new substance to, the three key principles of Weber's theory of the bureau—efficiency, objectivity, and rationality. We argue that neoliberalism, or the widespread economization of politics, has conditioned the digital versions of these principles, not least by subordinating social ends to technical means. At the same time we argue that digitalism engenders the privatization of authority, not least through its \"elective affinity\" with market logics.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"187 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46010580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 22

Behind the Cloak of Corporate Social Responsibility: Safeguards for Private Participation within Institutional Design 企业社会责任外衣背后:制度设计中私人参与的保障

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-12 DOI: 10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0233

Fenner L. Stewart

引用次数: 0

The Judicialization of Private Transnational Power and Authority 私人跨国权力和权威的司法化

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-12 DOI: 10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0061

A. C. Cutler

{"title":"The Judicialization of Private Transnational Power and Authority","authors":"A. C. Cutler","doi":"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0061","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the judicialization of private systems of governance that are transforming \"common sense\" understandings of who should govern states, societies, and political economies. The focus is on the private transnational institutions and processes in the global investment and financial regimes. These regimes contribute to the maintenance and expansion of capitalism by assisting in the management and mitigation of risk, but they also participate in the construction of the sorts of risks that require management and mitigation. In so doing, they are deeply involved in determining what requires governance, as well determining the appropriate mechanisms and manner of governance. They constitute a form of private transnational authority, performing governance functions usually attributed to states and to public authorities. In the areas of global investment and finance, private transnational experts craft the legal foundations that advance and secure the expansion of capitalism as the common sense of our time. These laws are characterized as a form of \"new constitutionalism,\" for they constitute both the material and ideological foundations for ordering societies and political economies under the discipline of an increasingly transnationalized market civilization. Transnational market civilization subordinates national political authorities to disciplines emanating from international investment, derivatives, and project financing agreements that function constitutionally to limit the policy and legislative autonomy of national governments, thus seriously impacting their sovereignty. However, while the areas examined reveal a complex and hybrid mix of public and private authorities that raise significant legitimacy concerns, the mix is not fixed, but is mutable and open in places to resistance and contestation, suggesting that the discipline of transnational capitalism is incomplete and might one day reflect better or \"good sense.\"","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"61 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44959052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

The Status of Authority in the Globalizing Economy: Beyond the Public/Private Distinction 权力在全球化经济中的地位：超越公共/私人区分

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-12 DOI: 10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0003

E. Hartmann, Poul F. Kjaer

引用次数: 3