企业社会责任外衣背后:制度设计中私人参与的保障

Q3 Social Sciences
Fenner L. Stewart
{"title":"企业社会责任外衣背后:制度设计中私人参与的保障","authors":"Fenner L. Stewart","doi":"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article challenges the reader to consider what modes of governance will ensure that corporations advance collective welfare. It identifies and explores \"new governance imagery,\" which holds out the promise of a governance that is more \"effective,\" \"efficient,\" and \"democratic.\" Such imagery is woven into the arguments used to champion institutional design's reliance on corporate decision-making. The article then questions the use of corporate social responsibility rhetoric, showing how it may lure regulators to disregard valid concerns about the effects of privatization and give them false assurance that the transfer of public power to business actors will inspire them to behave as public servants.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"233 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behind the Cloak of Corporate Social Responsibility: Safeguards for Private Participation within Institutional Design\",\"authors\":\"Fenner L. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article challenges the reader to consider what modes of governance will ensure that corporations advance collective welfare. It identifies and explores \\\"new governance imagery,\\\" which holds out the promise of a governance that is more \\\"effective,\\\" \\\"efficient,\\\" and \\\"democratic.\\\" Such imagery is woven into the arguments used to champion institutional design's reliance on corporate decision-making. The article then questions the use of corporate social responsibility rhetoric, showing how it may lure regulators to disregard valid concerns about the effects of privatization and give them false assurance that the transfer of public power to business actors will inspire them to behave as public servants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"233 - 264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文促使读者思考什么样的治理模式能确保公司提高集体福利。它确定并探索了“新的治理形象”,它提供了一个更“有效”、“高效”和“民主”的治理的承诺。这种意象被编织进了支持制度设计依赖企业决策的论据中。这篇文章随后质疑了企业社会责任修辞的使用,展示了它如何诱使监管机构无视对私有化影响的合理担忧,并给他们虚假的保证,即将公共权力移交给商业行为者将激励他们像公仆一样行事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behind the Cloak of Corporate Social Responsibility: Safeguards for Private Participation within Institutional Design
Abstract:This article challenges the reader to consider what modes of governance will ensure that corporations advance collective welfare. It identifies and explores "new governance imagery," which holds out the promise of a governance that is more "effective," "efficient," and "democratic." Such imagery is woven into the arguments used to champion institutional design's reliance on corporate decision-making. The article then questions the use of corporate social responsibility rhetoric, showing how it may lure regulators to disregard valid concerns about the effects of privatization and give them false assurance that the transfer of public power to business actors will inspire them to behave as public servants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信