{"title":"Causae coram nobis ventilatae","authors":"Viktória Kovács","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2013.07.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2013.07.03","url":null,"abstract":"Causae coram nobis ventilatae. Contributions to the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the papal legate, Gentilis de Monteflorum (1308–1311) \u0000This paper provides a contribution to the history of papal legations in Hungary at the beginning of the 14th century. The main aim of the study is to introduce the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the cardinal-legate, Gentilis de Monteflorum in Hungary in the period (1308–1311) and identify the existence or the absence of a systematic case managing. Especially important are in this respect the types of cases, their nature, significance, and the delegated clericals who were committed to decide these cases.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129443978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Delegated Papal Jurisdiction and the Religious Orders in the Diocese of Veszprém in the First Half of the 13th Century","authors":"G. Barabás","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.05","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is a short contribution to the history of papal delegated jurisdiction in Hungary in the first half of 13th century. The main aim of the study is to analyse the participation of the monasteries of religious orders in the diocese of Veszprém at the practical work of the system of papal judge-delegation. The connection could be formed in two quite separated ways: their officials, or as legal persons the convents themselves could function either as papal judges-delegate in foreign litigations, or they could be contestants of their own cases. The paper introduces the known cases of the second group from the selected era, since the main characteristics of the activities as papal judges-delegate are presented as well.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121664426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Magdeburg/Poznań and Gniezno","authors":"G. Kiss","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.02","url":null,"abstract":"The present work aims to study one of the basic problem of the medieval Polish ecclesiastical hierarchy, the formation of the first (arch)bishopric centers, the construction process of the ecclesiastical hierarchy. Two different level are to be distingished in this process, the first, the foundation of Poznań supported by Otto I’s imperial-eccliastical policy which attached the Polish territories to Magdeburg and the imperial hierarchy. On a second level, around the first millenium, the foundation of the archbishopric seat at Gniezno, by Otto III referrs to a new imperial and ecclesiasical idea, the development of the Orbis Christianus by the organization of independent ecclesiastical province of Poland. The present study examinates also if this double level has influenced the further development of the hierarchy and contributed to the dichotomy which is clearly detected in the 12th century.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123931947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Символы великокняжеской власти в средние века (по данным духовных грамот московских великих князей)","authors":"Tímea Bótor","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2013.07.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2013.07.06","url":null,"abstract":"Symbols of power in the wills of the Grand Princes of Moscow (14th– 15th Centuries) \u0000After a thorough examination of the valuables listed in the will, I came to the conclusion that symbols of the later autocratic political power (gold cap, barmy, carneol box, gold chain with cross) first became part of the inheritance of the eldest son in the will of Vasily II in 1462. It was during the reign of Vasily II that they acquired a prominent role and became the regal symbols of the first-born son, the future Grand Prince.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130974208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Quelques remarques à propos de la tradition textuelle de la Chronique hungaro–polonaise","authors":"Judit Csákó","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2013.07.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2013.07.07","url":null,"abstract":"Some remarks on the textual tradition of the Hungarian–Polish Chronicle. \u0000The relationship of the chronicle to the Hartvic Legend \u0000My paper is devoted to a narrative source, the so-called Hungarian–Polish Chronicle, also known as Chronicon mixtum. Whilst Hungarian philologists did not show much interest in the text, the 13th century source gained a growing popularity in Polish and Slovak historiography. In the present article, with the aim to determine what one can understand under the notion of the text of the Chronicon mixtum, I try to enlighten the relation between the longer redaction and the shorter version of the chronicle. This analysis is tightly connected with another interesting problem: one can ask which sort of text of the Hartvic Legend could have been used by the anonymous 13th century chronicler, who borrowed complete passages from the Hungarian vita of Saint Stephen. On the basis of the collation of the texts of the variant of the Hartvic Legend preserved in the Legendary of Seitz and the Hungarian–Polish Chronicle, László Szelestei N. could not exclude the possibility that the manuscript of Seitz and the Chronicon mixtum could reveal the existence of a shorter version of the Legenda Hartviciana: this variant could have been anterior to the text known in the research as Hartvic Legend. In my paper I reject this hypothesis, similarly to the theory of Ryszard Grzesik (Poznań) suggesting that the Hungarian–Polish Chronicle used a manuscript of the Saint Stephen vita which could have been closer to the archetype of the legend than any other known manuscript of the text.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"263 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116576309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Birth of the palatine branch of the Garai family The early history of the Dorozsma genus (1269–1375)","authors":"T. Árvai","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2013.07.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2013.07.05","url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this paper is to present that period of the history of the Dorozsma genus which started with it being mentioned for the first time (1269) and finished with the appointment of Nicholas to the office of palatine (1375). In this early time the genus disintegrated to branches and families which shared their hereditary possessions, performed military and diplomatic missions. They could start a conscious lordship-construction out of the estates they got from the king for their loyal service. Prosperous kinship and lord-in-waiting (familiaris) relationships were formed. The presentation of all these factors can hopefully expose the premises that preceded the “success-story” of the palatine branch of the Garai family in the middle of the 14th century.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130461866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Die Teilungen der Murinsel-Herrschaft der Familie Zrínyi im 17. Jahrhundert","authors":"F. Végh","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.09","url":null,"abstract":"The present paper is a contribution to the research of the Muraköz/Međimurje (also known as Csáktornya/Čakovec) domain of the Zrínyis’ that took up almost the entire territory of the Drava-Mura-triangle in the early modern times. The frontier domain acquired in 1546 was the „jewel” of the Hungarian-Croatian aristocratic family’s cross border stock of pos-sessions, making up about nearly half of its value. The study attempts to sketch the eventful history of possession of the domain until 1691, emphasizing its obvious similarities to the Zrínyis’ Slavonian estates lying on the Kulpa/Kupa river.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131299476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Der angebliche Böhmenfeldzug von Ladislaus I. dem Heiligen im Kapitel 140 der Ungarischen Chronik-komposition des 14. Jahrhunderts","authors":"Dániel Bagi","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.03","url":null,"abstract":"The present paper analyses chapter 140 of the so called Hungarian Chronicle Composition. The chapter contains stories form the end of the 11th century, but ot belongs to that pats of the text pool, which must have been written on turn of the 12–13th century. In the present paper I try to explain, why two Bohemian princes, Konrad and Svatopluk appear in the story, which sources they might have been taken from.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130266175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Практика имянаречений у князей Древней Руси – как исторический источник","authors":"Márta Font","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.01","url":null,"abstract":"The Naming of Princes in Kievan Rus' as a Historical Source \u0000The naming practice of the Rurikid dynasty reflects different factors: the Scandinavian (va-rangian) and Slavonic traditions are combined with each other and both were influenced by the Byzantine Christian tradition. During the Kievan period most of the princes had a traditional name as well as a Christian one, according to their patron saints. The analysis of naming practice reveals a changing tradition, while the examples from the Halych-Volhynian line of the dynasty point out the significance of names as historical sources.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124892440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Written and Visual Representations of Russian History in the 1660s","authors":"Endre Sashalmi","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2015.08.08","url":null,"abstract":"The relations between tsar Alexis and patriarch Nikon between 1652–1658 can be seen as the realization of the Byzantine idea of symphony, but there was a sharp break from 1658 on which finally led to the deposition of Nikon. It means that by the time Fedor Griboedov set out to write his work in the 1660s, the symphony between the tsar and the patriarch had already been over. The ideological struggle between the tsar and the patriarch exerted a great influence on the chronicle which must be interpreted in the context of this conflict. Griboedov’s chronicle completely abandoned the idea of symphony apparent in the Book of Degrees, though its structure closely resembled the latter and it quoted extensively from the Book of Degrees. The icon called The Planting of the Tree of the Muscovite State painted by Ushakov was a visual representation of the symphony existing only during Moscow’s historical past, and it also connected the salvation of Russia to the piety of the tsar and his family.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115226267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}