{"title":"How Multiple Identities Can Impact the Legitimacy of an Organization","authors":"Robert Heckert, Jelle Boumans, R. Vliegenthart","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2070754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2070754","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Organizations realize that their license to operate and the supportive behavior of their stakeholders relate to how they come across. If the identity of an organization is not a single, but multiple it may face unique challenges in strategic communication. The purpose of this study is to identify how the reputation and legitimacy of such a multiple identity organization (MIO) are affected by its performance and communications. Building on organizational identity theory, insights from corporate communication, and stakeholder theory, the potential vulnerabilities are listed through theoretical deduction and are illustrated by the case of Sanquin, the Dutch blood supply foundation. The case assessment relies on interviews with stakeholders and journalists, complemented with an analysis of newspaper headlines. The mismatch between the identities endangers legitimacy because legitimacy is based on the conformity to norms and values, the area where the identities clash. The inherent tension between the ideological and utilitarian identity cannot be avoided completely, but a strategic communication policy that manages the balance between the identities in organizational communication could help a better understanding of MIOs. The case offers insights into how creating this balance might be considered in the development of strategic communication of MIOs.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41482636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A CEO but Also A Parent: How Strategic Communication of Private Information about the CEO Affects Perceptions of an Organization during A Crisis","authors":"Thomas Koch, Nora Denner, Felix Coutandin","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2075749","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2075749","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In strategic communication, there is a plethora of studies dealing with effective crisis communication. CEO communication is an important building block in strategic crisis communication because in times of organizational crisis, the CEO often becomes an organization’s most important spokesperson. In this role, the leader of the organization has the opportunity to frame the organization’s crisis response in a certain way. The present study examines whether sharing private information about the CEO with stakeholders in a crisis response is beneficial for the perception of the organization. We experimentally analyze the effects of including such private information in a crisis response and test whether crisis type (accidental vs. preventable crisis) moderates these effects. The results show that organizational image is assessed more positively when the CEO includes private information in their crisis response. This effect is due to an increased identification with the CEO that, in turn, increases empathy for and trust in the CEO.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59884341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ideal-Practice Entanglement: When Emergence Fails to Enrich the Deliberate Planning Model","authors":"Emma Christensen","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2074300","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2074300","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Responsiveness to emergence is often depicted as key to successful communication. According to extant research, deliberate planning and emergence can become mutually enriching if agile strategizing is embraced. The transition towards such mindset, however, might prove more difficult to attain than extant research suggests. In this paper, I explore the perseverance of the deliberate planning model despite cases of emergence that question its usefulness. Drawing on theory of organizational reform practice, I discuss why recurrent discrepancies between deliberate models and strategizing practice might never lead practitioners to challenge such models. Specifically, the study argues that communication strategizing needs to be approached as a dialogic practice shaped not only by complementarity, but also by processes of competition and antagonism. The contribution of the paper is two-fold; it increases awareness that emergence does not necessarily lead practitioners to challenge the deliberate model and it provides a research agenda that can advance knowledge of the coexistence of the deliberate model and emergence.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42851700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Non-profit Brand Orientation as a Strategic Communication Approach","authors":"L. Sepulcri, E. Mainardes, L. Pascuci","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2058948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2058948","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the context of an emerging economy, this study aims to identify the factors that shape non-profit brand orientation (NBO). It also seeks to identify the main antecedents, outcomes, and barriers that are involved in its strategy implementation. The focus of this research is non-profit organizations (NPOs) in Brazil. Qualitative exploratory research with NPOs’ employees, donors, non-donors, and partners was performed using data collected from interviews, non-participant observation, and documents. The data were analyzed using content analysis. The results reveal four themes with associated categories: NBO (cause, mission, communication, and symbols); antecedents (internal factors, external factors, and community involvement); outcomes (staff relationships, partners, reputation, and performance), and barriers (a non-commercial mindset, short-term focus, communication challenges, organizational culture, government barriers, and a lack of resources). We suggest that brand strategic communication is a key factor that enables an NPO to disseminate the organization’s mission, cause, and symbols. All these factors together reflect the NBO. An NBO model is proposed, highlighting its antecedents, outcomes, and barriers, and pointing out similarities to and differences from the previous literature based on well-developed economies. This research discuss the peculiarities of NBO strategy in an emerging country context and the central point of brand strategic communication.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41773003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Engaging the Public in Disaster Communication: The Effect of Message Framing on Sharing Intentions for Social Media Posts","authors":"Jiyoun Kim, Yuan Wang, Lingyan Ma, A. Chatham","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2033979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2033979","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In times of emergency, organizations and members of the public have generated and shared crowdsourced information to help damaged communities. Using the 2018 California Camp Fire as a case study, this study explores how communication interventions influence people’s online message-sharing intentions. Specifically, through the lens of construal-level theory and prospect theory, this study demonstrates the direct and moderate persuasive effects of message framing on sharing intentions for Facebook posts. Using an online experiment with Amazon Mechanical Turk workers (N = 475), this study found that a gain-framed message encourages social media post-sharing intentions. The persuasive power of first-person versus third-person perspective frames differed depending on the use of gain versus loss frames. The discussion highlights the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44840873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What to Say and How to Say It? Corporate Strategic Communication through Social Media during the Pandemic","authors":"Yanyan Shang, Ru-Shiun Liou, Rekha Rao‐Nicholson","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2033980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2033980","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studying the COVID-19 pandemic differs from past studies on emergency management because this crisis event, compared with the terrorist attack or natural disasters, unfolds in a longer period and with a wider spread of geographic regions. This study explores what and how the information was communicated in the corporate strategic communication through social media across three phases of the global public health crisis, including the early phase, shelter-in-place phase, and reopening phase. The content analysis on corporate Twitter accounts of selected publicly listed firms in the US suggests that corporate social media communication is functional, information-based, direct, and of lower richness during the earlier phase of the pandemic. As the pandemic evolves, corporate tweets, though still functional, are altered to improve customer engagement via the addition of videos and embedded links. For low media richness data formats, the replies/retweet ratio is less than 20%, while high media richness data formats produce the replies/retweet ratio of more than 50%. Implications for future research and practices are offered.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44286038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Impact of Antecedents of Celebrity-Product Congruence on Value Transfer and Purchase Intention: Moderating Effect of Cognitive Strength and Over-endorsement","authors":"Nilesh Arora, S. Prashar, C. Parsad, Sai Vijay","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2033978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2033978","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This research explores the effect of celebrity components – entertainment, attractiveness, intense attachment, and celebrity-product congruence – on consumers’ value transfer and their purchase intention. Further, the research focuses on understanding the situation of multiple endorsements and ascertains the over-endorsement effects on consumer buying intention. Besides these, the study also evaluates the moderating effect of cognitive strength on shoppers’ purchase intentions. Highly recognized and lesser-recognized brands were used to demonstrate the presence of over-endorsement impact on shoppers’ purchase intentions. Data were collected using the survey instrument from 267 respondents. Two-step structural equation modeling was carried out for analyzing the data. The findings suggest that celebrity components play a vital role in influencing consumers’ buying intention and over-endorsement negatively influences shoppers’ purchase intentions. This research provides new knowledge about celebrity endorsement among consumers who have a different familiarity with these brands. The present study thus contributes to the existing literature by examining how the relationship between consumer and celebrity is influenced by various celebrity components along with the moderating effects of cognitive strength and over-endorsement.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46350532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Predicting Publics’ Compliance with Containment Measures at the Early Stages of COVID-19: The Role of Governmental Transparent Communication and Public Cynicism","authors":"Dongqing Xu, J. Li, Yeunjae Lee","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2039663","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2039663","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite the agreement on the importance of transparency in pandemic management, few studies have provided empirical evidence to answer the question of how governmental leadership and management teams can communicate strategically in a transparent manner. Integrating public relations, strategic communication and health communication literature, this study examines the effectiveness of CDC’s transparent communication in shaping individuals’ cynicism, self-efficacy beliefs as well as their cooperation during a pandemic, while taking the moderating role of media exposure and political ideology into consideration. A quantitative online survey was conducted with 502 participants who were living in the United States in early April 2020. Results indicated that effective transparent communication could reduce public cynicism and increase public self-efficacy to fight the pandemic, which subsequently leads to more cooperative precautions. Moreover, the relationship between CDC’s transparent communication practices and perceived cynicism toward the institution was moderated by media exposure (i.e., mass media and social media) and political ideology. The findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of pandemic communication and provide implications for practitioners in pandemic management, suggesting that health institutions should guarantee high transparency levels in their communication to encourage public precautionary cooperation.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42436010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alejandro Álvarez-Nobell, Andrea Oliveira, Andréia Athaydes, B. Barroso
{"title":"Strategic Communication and Political Ideologies in South America. COVID-19 Crisis Management in the Cases of the Populist Governments of Argentina and Brazil","authors":"Alejandro Álvarez-Nobell, Andrea Oliveira, Andréia Athaydes, B. Barroso","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2056040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2056040","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With regard to strategic communication, there is a set of additive factors driving the strategic complexity that determines the magnitude of an issue and the path to follow. During the COVID-19 pandemic, different governments worldwide have played a variety of roles and their impact has been conclusive. In Latin America, current political and ideological antagonism has configured a diversity of contexts and scenarios that have conditioned public communication management, setting out from the assumption that they have variously weighted the different driving factors of the strategic complexity. Within the framework of the EUPRERA COM-COVID network, we present the cases of strategic communication management of the national governments of Brazil and Argentina during the second half of 2020 and their impact on the population from the sanitary, social and economic levels. Of 1,332 demographically weighted cases, we analyze the information channels, credible sources, types of messages and their effectiveness comparatively. The most relevant conclusion lies in confirming that the strategic factor model in the public sector is conditioned by the ideological profile of who governs and this determines the decisions and effectiveness of the management.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47100499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccination and Public Health Communication Strategies: An In-depth Look at How Demographics, Political Ideology, and News/Information Source Preference Matter","authors":"Glen J. Nowak, M. Cacciatore","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2022.2039666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2039666","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Widely accepted public health actions and recommendations, particularly those related to vaccines, are critical to U.S. and global responses to infectious disease pandemics, such as COVID-19. For vaccination-related efforts like those involving COVID-19 vaccines, high national compliance is needed. While initial COVID-19 vaccination uptake in the U.S. has been quite high, it quickly became apparent that demographic characteristics, political ideology, and potentially news/information sources used were associated with COVID-19 vaccination acceptance, hesitancy, and resistance. Drawing from nationally published COVID-19 public opinion polls as well as social and behavioral science related to vaccination acceptance, this study used a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults 18 years-old and older, undertaken in November–December 2020, to examine how four key demographic characteristics (sex, age, race/ethnicity, education), political ideology (liberal, moderate, conservative), and news/information source preference (liberal, conservative, balanced) were related to COVID-19 vaccination intentions, COVID-19 risk-benefit perceptions, interest and attention to COVID-19 information, self-reported level of being informed on key COVID-19 items, and trust and use of common COVID-19 information sources. Multiple associations were found, with most having important implications for strategic communication efforts related to COVID-19 vaccination and other preventive health recommendations.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41811373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}