2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference最新文献_第5页

Modelling adaptability and variability in requirements 建模适应性和需求的可变性

2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference Pub Date : 2011-08-29 DOI: 10.1109/RE.2011.6051667

P. Greenwood, R. Chitchyan, A. Rashid, J. Noppen, Franck Fleurey, Arnor Solberg

引用次数: 2

Power and politics in requirements engineering: A proposed research agenda 需求工程中的权力和政治:一个建议的研究议程

2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference Pub Date : 2011-08-29 DOI: 10.1109/RE.2011.6051646

Alastair Milne, N. Maiden

引用次数: 22

Prioritization of quality requirements: State of practice in eleven companies 质量要求的优先次序:11家公司的实践情况

2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference Pub Date : 2011-08-29 DOI: 10.1109/RE.2011.6051652

Richard Berntsson-Svensson, T. Gorschek, B. Regnell, R. Torkar, Ali Shahrokni, R. Feldt, A. Aurum

{"title":"Prioritization of quality requirements: State of practice in eleven companies","authors":"Richard Berntsson-Svensson, T. Gorschek, B. Regnell, R. Torkar, Ali Shahrokni, R. Feldt, A. Aurum","doi":"10.1109/RE.2011.6051652","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2011.6051652","url":null,"abstract":"Requirements prioritization is recognized as an important but challenging activity in software product development. For a product to be successful, it is crucial to find the right balance among competing quality requirements. Although literature offers many methods for requirements prioritization, the research on prioritization of quality requirements is limited. This study identifies how quality requirements are prioritized in practice at 11 successful companies developing software intensive systems. We found that ad-hoc prioritization and priority grouping of requirements are the dominant methods for prioritizing quality requirements. The results also show that it is common to use customer input as criteria for prioritization but absence of any criteria was also common. The results suggests that quality requirements by default have a lower priority than functional requirements, and that they only get attention in the prioritizing process if decision-makers are dedicated to invest specific time and resources on QR prioritization. The results of this study may help future research on quality requirements to focus investigations on industry-relevant issues.","PeriodicalId":385129,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130629609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 98

Ready-set-transfer! Technology transfer in the requirements engineering domain Ready-set-transfer !需求工程领域的技术转移

2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1109/RE.2015.7320461

J. Cleland-Huang, Mona Rahimi, Mehdi Mirakhorli

引用次数: 0