Electrum最新文献_第5页

Andrew Lawler, Under Jerusalem: The Buried History of the World’s Most Contested City, Doubleday, New York 2021, pp. 464, ill. + maps; ISBN 978-0-385-54685-0 Andrew Lawler，《耶路撒冷之下：世界上最具竞争力城市的埋葬历史》，Doubleday，纽约2021，第464页，插图+地图；ISBN 978-0-385-54685-0

Electrum Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.23.022.17339

Chandler A. Collins

引用次数: 0

I re macedoni e le due corone di Zeus 我是马其顿人，我是宙斯的守护神

Electrum Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.23.003.17320

Elena Santagati

引用次数: 0

Stefan Pfeiffer, Gregor Weber (eds.), Gesellschaftliche Spaltungen im Zeitalter des Hellenismus (4.–1. Jahrhundert v. Chr.), (Oriens et Occidens –35), Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2021, 222 pp.; ISBN 978-3-515-13079-0 Stefan Pfeiffer，Gregor Weber（编辑），希腊主义时代的社会分化（4-1。在公元前19世纪），（Oriens et Occidents–35），Franz Steiner Verlag，斯图加特，2021，222页；ISBN 978-3-515-13079-0

Electrum Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.22.022.15792

E. Dąbrowa

引用次数: 0

Pat Wheatley, Charlotte Dunn, Demetrius the Besieger, Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York 2020, 528 pp; ISBN 9780198836049 Pat Wheatley，Charlotte Dunn，《围攻者德米特里》，牛津大学出版社，牛津-纽约2020，528页；ISBN 9780198836049

Electrum Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.22.021.15791

T. Zieliński

引用次数: 0

Pierangelo Buongiorno, Giuseppe Camodeca (eds.), Die senatus consulta in den epigraphischen Quellen. Texte und Bezeugungen, (Acta Senatus, B: Studien und Materialien –9), Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2021, 458 pp.; ISBN 978-3-515-12604-5 文艺书籍上有临床消息文字和证据，(1947年，B:学习和材料9)，弗兰茨·斯坦宁出版社，2021年，458页。书978-3-515-12604-5

Electrum Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.22.028.15798

E. Dąbrowa

引用次数: 0

Karl-Joachim Hölkeskamp, Sema Karataş, Roman Roth (eds.), Empire, Hegemony or Anarchy? Rome and Italy, 201–31 BCE, (Ancient History), Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2019, 259 pp., ISBN 978-3-515-11524-7 Karl Joachim Hölkeskamp，Sema Karataş，Roman Roth（编辑），帝国，霸权还是无政府？罗马和意大利，公元前201–31年，（古代史），Franz Steiner Verlag，斯图加特2019，259页，ISBN 978-3-515-11524-7

Electrum Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.22.024.15794

Maciej Piegdoń

引用次数: 0

Honoring the King in the Seleukid and Ptolemaic Empires: A Comparative Approach. Part 1 在塞琉基帝国和托勒密帝国向国王致敬：一种比较方法。第1部分

Electrum Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.22.005.15775

C. Lorber

引用次数: 0

Judean Piracy, Judea and Parthia, and the Roman Annexation of Judea: The Evidence of Pompeius Trogus 犹太海盗，犹太和帕提亚，以及罗马对犹太的吞并:庞培特罗古斯的证据

Electrum Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.22.009.15779

K. Atkinson

{"title":"Judean Piracy, Judea and Parthia, and the Roman Annexation of Judea: The Evidence of Pompeius Trogus","authors":"K. Atkinson","doi":"10.4467/20800909el.22.009.15779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20800909el.22.009.15779","url":null,"abstract":"Pompey the Great’s 63 BCE conquest of the Jewish kingdom known as the Hasmonean State has traditionally been viewed as an inevitable event since the Roman Republic had long desired to annex the Middle Eastern nations. The prevailing consensus is that the Romans captured the Hasmonean state, removed its high-priest kings from power, and made its territory part of the Republic merely through military force. However, Justin’s Epitome of the Philippic Histories of Pompeius Trogus is a neglected source of new information for understanding relations between the Romans and the Jews at this time. Trogus’s brief account of this period alludes to a more specific reason, or at least, circumstance for Pompey’s conquest of Judea. His work contains evidence that the Jews were involved in piracy, of the type the Republic had commissioned Pompey to eradicate. In addition to this activity that adversely affected Roman commercial interests in the Mediterranean, the Jews were also involved with the Seleucid Empire and the Nabatean Arabs, both of whom had dealings with the Parthians. Piracy, coupled with Rome’s antagonism towards the Parthians, negatively impacted the Republic’s attitude towards the Jews. Considering the evidence from Trogus, Roman fears of Jewish piracy and Jewish links to the Republic’s Parthian enemies were not unfounded.","PeriodicalId":38045,"journal":{"name":"Electrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48520512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The God Pakeidas in Jerash – His Worship through Archaeological and Epgraphical Sources 杰拉什的帕凯达斯神——通过考古和Epgraphical来源对他的崇拜

Electrum Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.22.014.15784

Aleksandra Kubiak-Schneider, A. Lichtenberger

引用次数: 0

,Lernen aus Niederlagen‘ und ,Schwächediskurse‘? Oder doch nur „aut vincere aut emori“? Bemerkungen zum komplexen Umgang Roms mit militärischen Niederlagen “从失败中学习”和“论弱点”？还是仅仅是“aut vincere aut emori”？罗马对军事失败的复杂处理评论

Electrum Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.4467/20800909el.22.013.15783

O. Stoll

{"title":",Lernen aus Niederlagen‘ und ,Schwächediskurse‘? Oder doch nur „aut vincere aut emori“? Bemerkungen zum komplexen Umgang Roms mit militärischen Niederlagen","authors":"O. Stoll","doi":"10.4467/20800909el.22.013.15783","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20800909el.22.013.15783","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines defeats and losses as phenomena of an ‘expanded military history’ of Roman History from the Republic to the Principate. It adopts a cultural historical perspective of the military historical phenomenon. “Patterns”and “strategies”are defined, that appear in the sources when dealing with Roman defeats, losses and losers (in particular the commanders or even the emperor himself). Above, the historiography of the Roman imperial period is exemplary examined to see what reasons, interpretations or explanations are given there for suffering a defeat and whether and how these are part of narrative strategies. Sometimes military catastrophes simply were concealed, belittled or reinterpreted. How Rome dealt with defeat tells something about Rome’s society and especially the elite: “Roman culture”or “Rome’s political culture” shaped the way how the military phenomenon of defeat was dealt with. Defeats could also be seen as chances for future victories, they were good for learning and examples for withstanding with the help of morale and disciplina. In the end Rome’s strategies in dealing with such catastrophic events of ‘military history’overall seem to paint the picture of Rome as a resilient socio-political and military system!","PeriodicalId":38045,"journal":{"name":"Electrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42492248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0