Knowledge Justice最新文献_第2页

Acknowledgments 致谢

Knowledge Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11969.003.0001

引用次数: 0

Introduction To Part II: The Courage of Character and Commitment versus the Cowardliness of Comfortable Contentment 第二部分导言:性格和承诺的勇气与安逸满足的怯懦

Knowledge Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11969.003.0010

Anthony W. Dunbar

引用次数: 2

Illuminate Erasure 照亮擦除

Knowledge Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11969.003.0009

引用次数: 0

Introduction to Part I 第一部分简介

Knowledge Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000402623

C. Kimball, A. Krakowski

引用次数: 1

Radical Collective Imaginations toward Liberation 激进的集体解放想象

Knowledge Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11969.003.0015

引用次数: 0

Index by Lori Salmon Lori Salmon的索引

Knowledge Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11969.003.0024

引用次数: 0

Relegated to the Margins: Faculty of Color, the Scholarly Record, and the Necessity of Antiracist Library Disruptions 退居边缘:有色系、学术记录和反种族主义图书馆中断的必要性

Knowledge Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11969.003.0014

Harrison W. Inefuku

{"title":"Relegated to the Margins: Faculty of Color, the Scholarly Record, and the Necessity of Antiracist Library Disruptions","authors":"Harrison W. Inefuku","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/11969.003.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11969.003.0014","url":null,"abstract":"demic publishing, and scholarly communication more broadly, have been shaped by professions that are overwhelmingly white— academia, publishing, and librarianship. These professions have developed a scholarly communication system comprised of policies, practices, and beliefs that marginalize contributions by and about communities of color. Scholarly communication is “the system through which research and other scholarly writings are created, evaluated for quality, disseminated to the scholarly community, and preserved for future use” (ACRL Scholarly Communications Committee 2003). A core tenet of Critical Race Theory (CRT) is that racism is ordinary and pervasive in societal structures— scholarly communication is no exception. It is marked by a series of gatekeepers that judge the admissibility of research into the scholarly record, sending messages to People of Color that they do not belong in academia and their research is not valuable. The inequities in publishing are representative of racial power dynamics in greater society, reflecting and reinscribing White Supremacy over the construction of knowledge. Academic publishing, the publication of the products of scholarly research, is the primary means through which knowledge is validated and entered into the scholarly record. In order to get published, research products typically undergo editorial and peer review, through which decisions are made as to whether these products are valid and significant enough for publication. Critique of liberalism is a tenet of 8","PeriodicalId":378977,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Justice","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127037228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3