Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State最新文献

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-010

引用次数: 0

Digital sovereignty and approaches to governing globalized data spaces 数字主权和治理全球化数据空间的方法

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-007

I. Volkmer

引用次数: 0

Data meets history: A research data management strategy for the historically oriented humanities 数据与历史相遇:面向历史的人文学科的研究数据管理策略

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-009

Fabian Cremer, Silvia Daniel, Marina Lemaire, K. Moeller, M. Razum, Arnošt Štanzel

引用次数: 1

Sovereignty in Miniature: The Mount Scopus Enclave, 1948–1967 主权的缩影:斯科普斯山飞地，1948-1967

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-003

Yfaat Weiss

{"title":"Sovereignty in Miniature: The Mount Scopus Enclave, 1948–1967","authors":"Yfaat Weiss","doi":"10.1515/9783110679151-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110679151-003","url":null,"abstract":": Contemporary scholarly literature has largely undermined the common perceptions of the term sovereignty, challenging especially those of an exclusive territorial orientation and offering a wide range of distinct interpretations that relate, among other things, to its performativity. Starting with Leo Gross ’ canonical text on the Peace of Westphalia (1948), this article uses new approaches to analyze the policy of the State of Israel on Jerusalem in general and the city ’ s Mount Scopus enclave in 1948 – 1967 in particular. The article exposes tactics invoked by Israel in three different sites within the Mount Scopus enclave, demilitarized and under UN control in the heart of the Jordanian-controlled sector of Jerusalem: two Jewish institutions (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah hospital), the Jerusalem British War Cemetery, and the Palestinian village of Issawiya. The idea behind these tactics was to use the Demilitarization Agreement, signed by Israel, Transjordan, and the UN on July 7, 1948, to undermine the status of Jerusalem as a Corpus Separatum , as had been proposed in UN Resolution 181 II. The concept of sovereignty stands at the center of numerous academic tracts written in the decades since the end of the Cold War and the partition of Europe. These days, with international attention focused on the question of Jerusalem ’ s international status – that is, Israel ’ s sovereignty over the town – there is partic-ularly good reason to examine the broad range of definitions yielded by these discussions. Such an examination can serve as the basis for an informed analy-sis of Israel ’ s policy in the past and, to some extent, even help clarify its current approach. This article seeks to do so by focusing on a supposedly exceptional issue, taking into consideration that a rule is expressed most clearly in the exception. 1 That rugged individualism of states ill accommodates itself to an international rule of law reinforced by necessary institutions. It would seem that the national will to self-control which after a prolonged struggle first threw off the external shackles of Pope and Emperor is the same which mutatis mutandis persists today in declining any far-reaching subordi-nation to external international controls. It was one of the essential characteristics of the League of Nations and it is one of the chief weaknesses of the United Nations. 11","PeriodicalId":377870,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131023177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

French imperial politics and the long shadow of Francophonie 法国帝国政治和法语国家的长期阴影

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-002

S. Mende

引用次数: 0

The people’s own media: Workers representation in Czechoslovak Socialist Television 人民自己的媒体:捷克斯洛伐克社会主义电视台的工人代表

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-005

Sebastian Lambertz

{"title":"The people’s own media: Workers representation in Czechoslovak Socialist Television","authors":"Sebastian Lambertz","doi":"10.1515/9783110679151-005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110679151-005","url":null,"abstract":": Even though on first sight socialist rule might appear as monolithic and totalitarian with no room for individual agency, people living in socialist societies nevertheless experienced substantial possibilities of self-determination. Especially workers as the socialist vanguard and most privileged societal group had certain spaces to negotiate the conditions of their everyday life with the regime. This paper seeks to identify such spaces of negotiation by analysing the exchanges between Czechoslovak Television ( Č ST – Č eskoslovenská televize) and its viewers with regard to the role of entertainment in the daily programme throughout the 1960s. Here, the audience ’ s agency contrasts the new media ’ s significance for the Communist Party as a crucial part of ideological education. The paper demonstrates that it was actually the Party ’ s efforts to build a socialist consciousness, which empowered workers to claim self-determination about their leisure time. Letters to the makers of TV programmes thus became an avenue to stake claims for the cultural sovereignty of the people. This reveals a perhaps surprising space of this contest: television programmes and entertainment. In the context of limited parliamentary and public channels for participation, these became an important arena as alternative channels for claiming participation were not available.","PeriodicalId":377870,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125221873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Contested sovereignties: The case of the “New World Information and Communication Order” at UNESCO in the 1970s 主权争议:1970年代联合国教科文组织的“新世界信息与传播秩序”案例

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-006

J. Brendebach

{"title":"Contested sovereignties: The case of the “New World Information and Communication Order” at UNESCO in the 1970s","authors":"J. Brendebach","doi":"10.1515/9783110679151-006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110679151-006","url":null,"abstract":"Intense debate on the reform of international relations and greater global justice marked the 1970s. Global economic reform was hotly discussed at the UN and elsewhere under the label of a “New International Economic Order”. A similar initiative emerged at the UN’s cultural organisation UNESCO, proposing a “New World Information and Communication Order”. This article argues that, early in the 1970s, representatives of the Non-Aligned Movement and the leadership of UNESCO promoted the inclusion of culture into the pursuit of a new international order, focusing above all on global media practices. The debate about a ‘New World Information and Communication Order’ (NWICO) produced far reaching claims about the impact of media on (national) culture(s), their role in national development and international politics. Notions of sovereignty stood at the heart of this debate. While UNESCO claimed a central role in defining culture’s place in international relations and offered newly independent states an arena for sovereign performances in international politics, the debate itself was essentially about probing the limits of state sovereignty with a view to media and communication.","PeriodicalId":377870,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State","volume":"2008 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116940468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Frontmatter

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-fm

引用次数: 0

Cultural sovereignty – A conclusion in four theses 文化主权——四篇论文的结语

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-008

Gregor Feindt, B. Gissibl, Johannes Paulmann

引用次数: 0

Introduction: Cultural sovereignty – claims, forms and contexts beyond the modern state 引言:文化主权——超越现代国家的主张、形式和语境

Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-001

Gregor Feindt, B. Gissibl, Johannes Paulmann

{"title":"Introduction: Cultural sovereignty – claims, forms and contexts beyond the modern state","authors":"Gregor Feindt, B. Gissibl, Johannes Paulmann","doi":"10.1515/9783110679151-001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110679151-001","url":null,"abstract":"“Sovereignty is back” – thus was the apodictic statement of Canadian historian and politician Michael Ignatieff in 2012. Indeed, sovereignty has made a most remarkable comeback both as a subject of political and scholarly debate as well as a feature of political practice. The list of recent and palpable assertions of state sovereignty in the traditional sense is long, and they found perhaps their most symbolic as well as their most concrete expression at that traditional site of state sovereignty since the nineteenth century that is the inter-state border. A few numbers for illustration: Between 2006 and 2015, an estimated 40,000 people died trying to cross state borders. While the number of border walls was as low as twelve in 1989 – the year the Berlin wall came down – walls and fences to clamp down and channel cross-border movements have risen to around 70 by the year 2014. Most recently, the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has triggered a series of actions by the states from closing borders for citizens of other countries and preventing exports of medical goods to imposing curfews or restrict free movement within their territories. Even within the European Union, joint actions seemed to lag behind these unilateral measures so that international coordination appeared more the result of a competitive process than based on multilateral cooperation. Consequently, the global implementation of such harsh policies of excluding non-nationals during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic stressed the current universal trajectory of sovereignty. If there has been a crisis of state sovereignty, as many political analysts have remarked over the last","PeriodicalId":377870,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129492058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0