Contested sovereignties: The case of the “New World Information and Communication Order” at UNESCO in the 1970s

J. Brendebach
{"title":"Contested sovereignties: The case of the “New World Information and Communication Order” at UNESCO in the 1970s","authors":"J. Brendebach","doi":"10.1515/9783110679151-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intense debate on the reform of international relations and greater global justice marked the 1970s. Global economic reform was hotly discussed at the UN and elsewhere under the label of a “New International Economic Order”. A similar initiative emerged at the UN’s cultural organisation UNESCO, proposing a “New World Information and Communication Order”. This article argues that, early in the 1970s, representatives of the Non-Aligned Movement and the leadership of UNESCO promoted the inclusion of culture into the pursuit of a new international order, focusing above all on global media practices. The debate about a ‘New World Information and Communication Order’ (NWICO) produced far reaching claims about the impact of media on (national) culture(s), their role in national development and international politics. Notions of sovereignty stood at the heart of this debate. While UNESCO claimed a central role in defining culture’s place in international relations and offered newly independent states an arena for sovereign performances in international politics, the debate itself was essentially about probing the limits of state sovereignty with a view to media and communication.","PeriodicalId":377870,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State","volume":"2008 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Sovereignty beyond the Modern State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110679151-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Intense debate on the reform of international relations and greater global justice marked the 1970s. Global economic reform was hotly discussed at the UN and elsewhere under the label of a “New International Economic Order”. A similar initiative emerged at the UN’s cultural organisation UNESCO, proposing a “New World Information and Communication Order”. This article argues that, early in the 1970s, representatives of the Non-Aligned Movement and the leadership of UNESCO promoted the inclusion of culture into the pursuit of a new international order, focusing above all on global media practices. The debate about a ‘New World Information and Communication Order’ (NWICO) produced far reaching claims about the impact of media on (national) culture(s), their role in national development and international politics. Notions of sovereignty stood at the heart of this debate. While UNESCO claimed a central role in defining culture’s place in international relations and offered newly independent states an arena for sovereign performances in international politics, the debate itself was essentially about probing the limits of state sovereignty with a view to media and communication.
主权争议:1970年代联合国教科文组织的“新世界信息与传播秩序”案例
20世纪70年代是关于国际关系改革和全球正义的激烈辩论的年代。在“国际经济新秩序”的标签下,全球经济改革在联合国和其他地方被热烈讨论。联合国教科文组织(UNESCO)也提出了类似的倡议,提出“世界信息与传播新秩序”。本文认为,在20世纪70年代初,不结盟运动的代表和教科文组织的领导层推动将文化纳入追求新的国际秩序,首先关注全球媒体实践。关于“新世界信息与传播秩序”(NWICO)的辩论产生了关于媒体对(国家)文化的影响、它们在国家发展和国际政治中的作用的深远主张。主权概念是这场辩论的核心。虽然联合国教科文组织声称在定义文化在国际关系中的地位方面发挥了核心作用,并为新独立的国家提供了一个在国际政治中表现主权的舞台,但辩论本身本质上是关于从媒体和传播的角度探索国家主权的界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书