Journal of Relationships Research最新文献_第2页

Break-Up Anxiety in Conflict Narratives Told by Emerging Adult Couples 新成年夫妇讲述的冲突叙事中的分手焦虑

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2020-08-07 DOI: 10.1017/jrr.2020.8

Elisa Liang, C. Feiring

引用次数: 1

Couple Conflict and Music Utilisation 夫妻冲突和音乐的利用

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2020-08-07 DOI: 10.1017/jrr.2020.9

Kevin M. Smith, G. Martin

引用次数: 0

Psychosocial Predictors of Love Satisfaction Among College Students from Madeira 马德拉大学生爱情满意度的心理社会预测因素

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2020-06-09 DOI: 10.1017/jrr.2020.4

L. Soares, Orlanda Cruz, Filipa Oliveira, C. V. Lucas, F. Neto

引用次数: 2

Breakup Likelihood Following Hypothetical Sexual or Emotional Infidelity: Perceived Threat, Blame, and Forgiveness 假设性或情感不忠后分手的可能性：感知的威胁、指责和宽恕

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2020-06-08 DOI: 10.1017/jrr.2020.5

T. V. Grøntvedt, L. Kennair, Mons Bendixen

引用次数: 4

The Italian Adaptation of the Romantic Competence Interview: A Preliminary Test of Psychometrics Properties 浪漫能力访谈的意大利改编：心理测量学性质的初步检验

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2020-05-07 DOI: 10.1017/jrr.2020.3

G. Cuccì, J. Davila, M. G. Olivari, E. Confalonieri

引用次数: 1

Subjective Well-being, Personality, and Loneliness as Correlates of Saudade: A Preliminary Study 主观幸福感、个性和孤独感与Saudade的相关性研究

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2020-04-08 DOI: 10.1017/jrr.2020.1

F. Neto, E. Mullet

引用次数: 2

Differences in Retrospective Perceptions of Parenting Among Adolescents and Young Adults 青少年和年轻人对父母教养的回顾性认知差异

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI: 10.1017/jrr.2020.2

Szilvia Jámbori, Judit Kőrössy

{"title":"Differences in Retrospective Perceptions of Parenting Among Adolescents and Young Adults","authors":"Szilvia Jámbori, Judit Kőrössy","doi":"10.1017/jrr.2020.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2020.2","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the present study, the possible differences in parenting perceptions between young people socialised before the political changes in the socialist regime and those born after the regime change were explored. In Study 1 (2002) and Study 2 (2018), adolescents and young adults’ retrospective perceptions of parenting were examined. In the first study, the participants included 126 adolescents and 145 young adults, and there were 133 adolescents and 204 young adults in the second study. In both studies, the participants completed the Family Socialisation Questionnaire (Dalbert & Goch, 1997), which is employed to assess parenting practices retrospectively. Second order factor analyses on both occasions revealed that the age groups perceived parenting styles in a similar way. The similarities of the two age groups’ perceptions of parenting could be explained by employing the developmental niche theory, which is when the homeostatic functioning of the niche ensures relatively stable parenting styles, despite changing circumstances. On both occasions, young adults perceived parenting as more negative and restrictive. These results are discussed in detail.","PeriodicalId":37757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Relationships Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jrr.2020.2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43977926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Understanding Infidelity Forgiveness: An Application of Implicit Theories of Relationships 理解不忠宽恕:内隐关系理论的应用

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2020-01-17 DOI: 10.1017/jrr.2019.21

A. E. Thompson, Dallas J. Capesius, D. Kulibert, Randi A. Doyle

{"title":"Understanding Infidelity Forgiveness: An Application of Implicit Theories of Relationships","authors":"A. E. Thompson, Dallas J. Capesius, D. Kulibert, Randi A. Doyle","doi":"10.1017/jrr.2019.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2019.21","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two studies were conducted to identify variables associated with hypothetical infidelity forgiveness and promote forgiveness by manipulating implicit theories of relationships (ITRs; destiny/growth beliefs). Study 1 assessed the relationship between the type of behaviour, sex of the forgiver, ITRs and infidelity forgiveness. Study 2 investigated the causal relationship between ITRs and infidelity forgiveness (including attachment insecurity as a moderator). Results revealed that male participants forgave a partner's infidelity to a greater extent than female participants and that solitary behaviours were rated as most forgivable, followed by emotional/affectionate and technology/online behaviours, and sexual/explicit behaviours as least forgivable. Male participants (not female participants) induced to endorse growth beliefs forgave a partner's emotional/affectionate and solitary infidelity to a greater extent than those induced to endorse destiny beliefs; attachment insecurity moderated this relationship. These results have important implications for researchers and practitioners working with couples in distress.","PeriodicalId":37757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Relationships Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jrr.2019.21","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56981502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Phubbing and Social Relationships: Results from an Australian Sample 低头和社会关系:来自澳大利亚样本的结果

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI: 10.1017/JRR.2019.9

Yeslam Al‐Saggaf, Rachel MacCulloch

{"title":"Phubbing and Social Relationships: Results from an Australian Sample","authors":"Yeslam Al‐Saggaf, Rachel MacCulloch","doi":"10.1017/JRR.2019.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/JRR.2019.9","url":null,"abstract":"Existing research on phubbing has focused mainly on one relationship group (i.e., partner phubbing). How does phubbing differ across different relationship groups (i.e., family vss people at work)? How does phubbing differ within the same relationship group (i.e., in the case of family relations: parents vs. children)? In which situations (i.e., in bed or at the dinner table) are people more likely to phub others? An online survey of 387 participants, predominantly Australians, revealed that participants were more likely to phub family, friends and strangers than people at work, and they were more likely to phub family and friends than strangers. With regard to family relations, participants were more likely to phub parents, partners and children than grandparents. They were more likely to phub partners and children than parents. The reason certain people are phubbed more frequently than others and in specific situations more than others is due to which social norms matter the most: injunctive norms or smartphone-related internalised norms. Considering that phubbing impacts those with whom the phubber has a closer relationship and those with whom the phubber has a distant relationship, comparing how phubbing differs across different relationship groups contributes to understanding the impact of phubbing on social relationships.","PeriodicalId":37757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Relationships Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/JRR.2019.9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42194374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 18

A Dyadic Perspective on Sexual Subjectivity and Romantic Relationship Functioning. 性主观性与浪漫关系功能的二元视角。

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-09-30 DOI: 10.1017/jrr.2019.18

Brittany Kohlberger, Valerie A Simon, Zenaida Rivera

{"title":"A Dyadic Perspective on Sexual Subjectivity and Romantic Relationship Functioning.","authors":"Brittany Kohlberger, Valerie A Simon, Zenaida Rivera","doi":"10.1017/jrr.2019.18","DOIUrl":"10.1017/jrr.2019.18","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual subjectivity is a central feature of healthy sexuality that is believed to shape and be shaped by relationship experiences. However, no studies have examined sexual subjectivity within a dyadic context. The current study examined partner similarity in sexual subjectivity within 75 heterosexual couples and associations with sexual relationship functioning using actor-partner interdependence models. Within couples, partners' scores were significantly correlated on three of five elements of sexual subjectivity and showed similar mean levels on four of the five elements. Men's and women's sexual self-efficacy were positively associated with their own sexual communication. Other associations varied by gender. Men's sexual body esteem and entitlement to self-pleasure predicted their reports of sexual relationship functioning, and women's entitlement to pleasure from partners and sexual reflection predicted their reports of relationship functioning. Few partner effects were observed. Findings suggest that partners' sexual subjectivity is relevant for dyadic functioning in emerging adulthood. Longitudinal research is needed to examine how experiences within and across relationships contribute to the development of sexual self-concepts and sexual functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":37757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Relationships Research","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7994937/pdf/nihms-1536999.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25538955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0