Differences in Retrospective Perceptions of Parenting Among Adolescents and Young Adults

Q3 Psychology

Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.1017/jrr.2020.2

Szilvia Jámbori, Judit Kőrössy

{"title":"Differences in Retrospective Perceptions of Parenting Among Adolescents and Young Adults","authors":"Szilvia Jámbori, Judit Kőrössy","doi":"10.1017/jrr.2020.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the present study, the possible differences in parenting perceptions between young people socialised before the political changes in the socialist regime and those born after the regime change were explored. In Study 1 (2002) and Study 2 (2018), adolescents and young adults’ retrospective perceptions of parenting were examined. In the first study, the participants included 126 adolescents and 145 young adults, and there were 133 adolescents and 204 young adults in the second study. In both studies, the participants completed the Family Socialisation Questionnaire (Dalbert & Goch, 1997), which is employed to assess parenting practices retrospectively. Second order factor analyses on both occasions revealed that the age groups perceived parenting styles in a similar way. The similarities of the two age groups’ perceptions of parenting could be explained by employing the developmental niche theory, which is when the homeostatic functioning of the niche ensures relatively stable parenting styles, despite changing circumstances. On both occasions, young adults perceived parenting as more negative and restrictive. These results are discussed in detail.","PeriodicalId":37757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Relationships Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jrr.2020.2","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Relationships Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2020.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the present study, the possible differences in parenting perceptions between young people socialised before the political changes in the socialist regime and those born after the regime change were explored. In Study 1 (2002) and Study 2 (2018), adolescents and young adults’ retrospective perceptions of parenting were examined. In the first study, the participants included 126 adolescents and 145 young adults, and there were 133 adolescents and 204 young adults in the second study. In both studies, the participants completed the Family Socialisation Questionnaire (Dalbert & Goch, 1997), which is employed to assess parenting practices retrospectively. Second order factor analyses on both occasions revealed that the age groups perceived parenting styles in a similar way. The similarities of the two age groups’ perceptions of parenting could be explained by employing the developmental niche theory, which is when the homeostatic functioning of the niche ensures relatively stable parenting styles, despite changing circumstances. On both occasions, young adults perceived parenting as more negative and restrictive. These results are discussed in detail.

查看原文本刊更多论文

青少年和年轻人对父母教养的回顾性认知差异

摘要本研究探讨了社会主义政权变革前出生的年轻人与社会主义政权变革后出生的年轻人在父母教养观念上可能存在的差异。在研究1(2002)和研究2(2018)中，研究人员对青少年和年轻人的育儿观进行了回顾性研究。在第一项研究中，参与者包括126名青少年和145名年轻人，第二项研究中有133名青少年和204名年轻人。在这两项研究中，参与者都完成了家庭社会化问卷(Dalbert & Goch, 1997)，该问卷用于回顾性评估父母教养行为。两种情况下的二阶因子分析显示，年龄组对父母教养方式的看法相似。两个年龄组对养育子女的看法的相似性可以用发展生态位理论来解释，即生态位的稳态功能确保了相对稳定的养育方式，尽管环境在变化。在这两种情况下，年轻人都认为父母的教育方式更消极、更具限制性。对这些结果进行了详细的讨论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Relationships Research Psychology-Social Psychology

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This innovative journal provides researchers and practitioners with access to quality, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed articles covering the entire range of fields associated with personal, intimate, organizational and family, and social relationships, development, training and analysis of human relationship skills across the life-span. Originally an initiative of the Psychology of Relationships Interest Group of the Australian Psychological Society, the journal became independent within its first year with the intention of publishing papers from the full array of researchers of relationship. The journal features an experienced and eclectic international Editorial Board and is international in its reach. There is a special emphasis on contributions from Asia, including the subcontinent and Pacific regions but the journal welcomes papers from all other parts of the world.