{"title":"Memo to the Obama Administration on 'Improving the International Investment Regime'","authors":"K. Sauvant","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2740686","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2740686","url":null,"abstract":"In January 2009, VCC sent a Memo to President Obama’s Administration on “Improving the international investment regime.” The Memo encourages the new Administration to take a look at the current international investment regime and consider several actions that the United States might take to strengthen that regime. A number of these ideas are already on the table, and the new Administration will have to be prepared, in one way or another, to deal with them. Several eminent colleagues at Columbia University signed on to the Memo.","PeriodicalId":377344,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121710557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Investment: Contestation and Transformation","authors":"Taylor St John","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3909800","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3909800","url":null,"abstract":"At first glance, the governance of foreign direct investment (FDI) is a graveyard for multilateral cooperation. Describing or analysing a “global investment regime” has long seemed more fantasy than reality. Keohane and Ooms observed in 1975 that: “Writing about alternative international regimes to deal with direct foreign investment may seem to be somewhat like discussing a perpetual motion machine: most people would like one for their own purposes; no one has ever built one; and discussions about their construction often take on a certain air of unreality.” Today, 40 years later, there is still no international organization mandated with the governance of direct investment. The repeated negotiating failures and absence of formal organization-building in the postwar period gives the governance of direct investment a different trajectory than most issue areas discussed in the original Gridlock volume. Direct investment is not a new phenomenon – flows of FDI have been high throughout the postwar period. Yet formal multilateral cooperation did not succeed in creating a dedicated organization or core convention to govern those flows in the immediate postwar era, unlike the pattern observed in other issue areas and described in Gridlock.","PeriodicalId":377344,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125165448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}