Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2019-09-02DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2019.1690384
Tatia Chikhladze, H. Aliyev
{"title":"Towards an “uncivil” society? Informality and civil society in Georgia","authors":"Tatia Chikhladze, H. Aliyev","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2019.1690384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2019.1690384","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the early 1990s, the NGO sector in the South Caucasus has faced countless challenges on its road to development. Among these, an endemic “informalisation of society” – to a certain degree inherited from the Soviet Union – posed a seemingly insurmountable number of obstacles for the emergence and establishment of an egalitarian and open civil society in the region. This study explores the uneasy relationship between formal civil society and the informal sphere in the republic of Georgia. We argue that scholars and policy-makers alike need to pay close attention to how informal institutions, regardless of their non-civil nature, often become part of the civil sector in the context of developing countries. Informal patronage networks, radical movements and extremist organizations ̶ some registered and some remaining informal – often pose as civil society organizations, functioning as a “dark” side of NGOisation in post-Communist countries. This “uncivil” society thrives due to the low popular participation in formal civil society in this region and undermines the potential gains to be made by the development of a robust civil sector.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2019.1690384","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49055025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2019-05-04DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2019.1626150
B. Tashev
{"title":"We need to talk about Putin: how the West gets him wrong","authors":"B. Tashev","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2019.1626150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2019.1626150","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2019.1626150","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46324008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2019-05-04DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2019.1617652
David Gogishvili, Suzanne Harris-Brandts
{"title":"The social and spatial insularity of internally displaced persons: “neighbourhood effects” in Georgia’s collective centres","authors":"David Gogishvili, Suzanne Harris-Brandts","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2019.1617652","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2019.1617652","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since 1991, armed conflicts in regions of Georgia have forced over 300,000 people to become internally displaced persons (IDPs). Many settled on the outskirts of cities in state-provided, non-residential buildings called collective centres, which function as distinct neighbourhoods with their spatial segregation and community networks. This article charts the impacts of social and spatial insularity on IDPs in these centres and frames it within the concept of neighbourhood effects. Research on neighbourhood effects has shown that physical and social isolation can exacerbate issues of health, education, living conditions, and employment, present in particular areas. Although IDPs are a vulnerable, socio-economically disadvantagedpopulation often living in concentrated poverty, to date this concept has not been applied to their conditions. This article addresses that gap by examining the neighbourhood effects of collective centres. The work provides a meta-analysis of existing research on Georgian IDPs and complements it with two years of first-hand data collected through a representative survey. The results show that IDPs within Georgia are at multiple disadvantages as a result of their isolation in collective centres. The article concludes with a call for greater government consideration of IDP isolation in situations of protracted conflict, so as to resist such detrimental effects.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2019.1617652","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44343644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2019-05-04DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2019.1614751
A. Grigoryan
{"title":"Armenia’s path to democratization by recursive mass protests","authors":"A. Grigoryan","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2019.1614751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2019.1614751","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study analyses the “Velvet Revolution” of 2018 in Armenia, making a comparison with previous democratization attempts in order to facilitate understanding of some of the long-term tendencies which eventually made the revolution possible. Mass protest movements in Armenia, beginning with non-successful post-electoral protests in 2003–2004 and ending with the civil disobedience campaign resulting in regime collapse in 2018 are analyzed, and some comparisons with other cases of regime change and following developments are offered. The study contributes to the understanding of why this particular mode of regime change succeeded at that particular moment, and the implications for the post-revolution period.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2019.1614751","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45616447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2019-01-24DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2019.1565192
Gerard Toal (Gearóid Ó Tuathail), Gela Merabishvili
{"title":"Borderization theatre: geopolitical entrepreneurship on the South Ossetia boundary line, 2008–2018","authors":"Gerard Toal (Gearóid Ó Tuathail), Gela Merabishvili","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2019.1565192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2019.1565192","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Borderization refers to the construction of physical barriers to transform a territorial ceasefire line into an international border. The term was used first by European Union officials to refer to the administrative boundary line between Georgia and de facto state of South Ossetia. The article analyses how physical border construction in this area became a theatre of symbolic (geo)political gamesmanship, a background prop for political competition between Georgian domestic parties and a pilgrimage site for visualizing Georgia’s victimhood to international audiences. Presenting borderization as evidence of domestic irresoluteness or geopolitical aggression is a rhetorical gambit that may or may not work. Those most associated with it in Georgian domestic politics lost power. Internationally, though, borderization is now part of standard litanies of Russian geopolitical aggression, cited even by politicians who support border walls. The relative success of Georgia’s borderization theatre complexifies hegemonic socialization arguments for it reveals the capacity of small states to socialize hegemonic states into sharing their tropes of victimhood and vulnerability.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2019-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2019.1565192","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42142182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2019-01-18DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2019.1567145
E. Rodina, Dmitriy Dligach
{"title":"Dictator’s Instagram: personal and political narratives in a Chechen leader’s social network","authors":"E. Rodina, Dmitriy Dligach","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2019.1567145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2019.1567145","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to explore how social networks, Instagram in particular, can be utilized by an autocrat in order to construct and promote the image of a charismatic leader. To do so, we conduct a topic modelling of 6854 Instagram posts made by Ramzan Kadyrov, the dictatorial head of the autonomous Chechen Republic in the Russian Federation. We then analyze the verbal framing of 24 dominant topics. The study concludes that the main rhetorical device that Kadyrov employs is a merging of personal and political themes throughout his posts. He personalizes political discussion by discussing public interest topics through the prism of his own personal life, and inserts political discourse into personal, intimate posts about his family, pastimes, and friends. The study shows that this tactic, often understood by media researchers as an oppositional device for harnessing popular support against an autocratic state, can be just as successfully employed by an autocratic leader. Kadyrov, who in his Instagram combines the tactics of a populist politician and an internet celebrity, has shaped a personality that can be best described as a “flirting populist” (Vezjak, Boris. 2018. “Dobro zmaguje: predsednik kot krščanski populist.” In Media Res (personal blog), https://vezjak.com/2018/01/02/dobro-zmaguje-predsednik-kot-krscanski-populist/), which, as we suggest, is a new, online technology-enhanced type of a political figure.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2019-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2019.1567145","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47083171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2019-01-02DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2018.1541218
L. Fix, Andrea Gawrich, Kornely K. Kakachia, Alla Leukavets
{"title":"Out of the shadow? Georgia’s emerging strategies of engagement in the Eastern Partnership: between external governance and partnership cooperation","authors":"L. Fix, Andrea Gawrich, Kornely K. Kakachia, Alla Leukavets","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2018.1541218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2018.1541218","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When the Eastern Partnership (EaP) was launched in 2009, the core motivation was to supplement the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) with an improved eastern dimension. The EaP was conceived to offer more incentives and rewards, thereby shifting the manner of cooperation to more partnership and away from asymmetry. This article analyses the intentions and effects of the EaP in the case of EU-Georgia relations by investigating two modes of cooperation (external governance and partnership cooperation), which should theoretically enhance EU-Georgia relations. The article’s results reveal that a more fine-tuned partnership concept best suits an analysis of Georgia’s participation within the EaP, depending on the policy field of cooperation.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2018.1541218","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47987354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2018-09-21DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2018.1499299
Ekaterine Pirtskhalava
{"title":"Being here and there: a case study of Muslim Meskhetians’ identity and belonging, formation and reconstruction in the United States","authors":"Ekaterine Pirtskhalava","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2018.1499299","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2018.1499299","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examines how relocation to the US influenced the identity maintenance of the Muslim Meskhetians. In 1944, as a result of Stalin’s social policy to clean the southern border of the Soviet Union of “undesirable peoples”, a Muslim population, primordially comprised of Turkish-speaking Meskhetians, was deported from Georgia to Central Asian republics. After ethnic conflict in Uzbekistan in 1989, a part of this population and the informants for this research, relocated to Russia and from there to the US. Guided by previous studies on cultural adaptation and identity maintenance among migrants, the given study was conducted to identify how this group has reshaped its identity after the resettlement to the US. Based on 30 in-depth qualitative interviews with Meskhetian Muslims living in the states of Pennsylvania and Illinois, the study demonstrates the effects of the relocation on the maintenance of Muslim Meskhetian identity and belonging. Using theoretical concepts of identity, place identity and imagined communities, this work illustrates how American cultural influence reflects on Muslim Meskhetians’ perceptions of culture and ethnic identity in the US.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2018.1499299","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46710732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2018-09-02DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2018.1522796
Aaron Erlich
{"title":"Pre-acceptance as a method to combat publication bias in area studies: a pilot in the Caucasus","authors":"Aaron Erlich","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2018.1522796","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2018.1522796","url":null,"abstract":"Many social scientists in the readership of Caucasus Survey will have heard of the replication crisis (Open Science Collaboration 2015). This refers to the problem whereby results from seminal studies often cannot be replicated by scholars attempting to follow the same protocol as in the original studies. One of the leading reasons thought to be responsible for the replication crisis is publication bias. This refers to the widespread phenomenon in which only those studies with findings that reviewers deem to be important get published. As a result, null findings do not get published; moreover, scholars face perverse incentives to produce substantively and statistically significant results. With reviewers often predisposed to favouring exceptional findings, studies that display unusual findings on some dimension may be more likely to make it through the review process. Meanwhile, other studies, no less rigorous but lacking in eye-catching results, face a higher bar in making it to publication. The replication crisis has a particular relevance to area studies, as publishing only unusual findings may privilege research that makes a region seem more exceptional than it is, while downplaying trends that may follow common patterns. This is particularly true of the Caucasus, a part of the world where both scholars and residents often point to the uniqueness of a putatively “exotic” region. The pre-acceptance model seeks to combat publication bias by front-loading the review process before the results are seen, in order to have reviewers focus on the importance of the research questions being asked and the theoretical innovation of the study without looking at the findings ahead of time. This special section showcases the pre-acceptance model and features two articles submitted and reviewed through this method. In this brief introductory essay, I explain the pre-acceptance model and its rationale and then discuss both the benefits and downsides of the process. I end with a brief discussion of the papers in this special section.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2018.1522796","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47733619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caucasus SurveyPub Date : 2018-09-02DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2018.1507599
N. Abbasov, David S. Siroky
{"title":"Joining the club: explaining alliance preferences in the South Caucasus","authors":"N. Abbasov, David S. Siroky","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2018.1507599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2018.1507599","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Foreign policy alliance formation among small states in the aggregate has been extensively examined in the literature, but mass opinion and preferences on alliance formation in these states remains understudied. To address this gap, this article examines individual alliance preferences in two small states in the South Caucasus region: Georgia and Armenia. While most Armenians seem to support Armenian membership in CSTO and most Georgians appear to believe that Georgia should pursue NATO membership, some Armenians and Georgians prefer equal relations with both security alliances. The paper suggests that threat perception influences alliance formation preferences at the individual level and advances three testable pre-registered propositions. First, individuals who perceive Azerbaijan or Turkey as the primary threat to their state tend to support alignment with the Russian-led CSTO. Second, individuals who view the main threat to their state coming from Russia are predisposed to support NATO membership. Finally, individuals who believe that tensions between Russia and the West are detrimental to their country are more inclined to support equal relations with both NATO and CSTO. In general, the evidence is consistent with these conjectures. We conclude with important qualifications and key implications for the study of mass opinion on alliance formation.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2018.1507599","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46320595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}