Administrative Theory and Praxis最新文献_第2页

Transnational think tank networks: Multipliers of political power or a new form of expertise monopolies at the European level 跨国智库网络：政治权力的乘数或欧洲层面专业知识垄断的新形式

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2124746

T. Bajenova

{"title":"Transnational think tank networks: Multipliers of political power or a new form of expertise monopolies at the European level","authors":"T. Bajenova","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2022.2124746","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2022.2124746","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the involvement of European think tanks (TTs) in transnational TT networks as a particular form of their social capital based on empirical data from website materials and semi-structured interviews with representatives of TTs from Brussels, London, Paris and Ljubljana, their networks and European institutions. This paper built on Bourdieu’s field theory and elements of social network analysis (SNA) contributes to a theory of the relation between fields and social networks. This study shows that positions of field members can be derived from network ties between them using different elements of SNA and Gephi software for the visualization of the TT social capital. Overall, this article argues that transnational TT networks contribute to establishing social boundaries of the transnational field of European TTs horizontally differentiating the TT field from other social fields and vertically transposing it from national to European level. Furthermore, TT social capital manifested in interaction of European TTs in these transnational TT networks determines the relational structure of their transnational TT field due to democratic deficit of the EU transnational administration which incites TTs to establish formally representative groups.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"45 1","pages":"100 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45345687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Implementing indigenous paradigms: the paradoxes of actualizing Sumak Kawsay 实施本土范式：实施Sumak Kawasay的悖论

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2138196

M. A. Castillo

引用次数: 2

Administrative Burden as Intermediate Negative Policy Feedback: Explaining Low-Income Migrant Exodus amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in India 作为中间负面政策反馈的行政负担：解释新冠肺炎大流行期间印度低收入移民外流

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2124745

Srinivas Yerramsetti, S. Soni, N. V. Mali

引用次数: 0

The “illusion” of administrative sovereignty in developing countries: A historical institutionalism perspective on administrative sovereignty in Ghana 发展中国家行政主权的“幻觉”:加纳行政主权的历史制度主义视角

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2138193

F. Ohemeng, Rosina Foli

{"title":"The “illusion” of administrative sovereignty in developing countries: A historical institutionalism perspective on administrative sovereignty in Ghana","authors":"F. Ohemeng, Rosina Foli","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2022.2138193","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2022.2138193","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The emergence of transnational administrations and their influence on domestic affairs of countries have led to the questioning of the notion of administrative sovereignty. Yet, the question of whether countries have this sovereignty and how it should be understood is to be fully resolved and the debate continues unabated. In this paper, we contribute to this debate by focusing on whether countries from the developing south, are and can be administratively sovereign and to what extent can they be considered as such. Have developing countries ever been administratively sovereign? To what extent are these states administratively sovereign, if any? In short, how free are the authorities in these countries in organizing their own administrative apparatuses in policy development and service delivery? What can historical institutionalism teach us about the issue of administrative sovereignty? Following the continuum in the understanding of administrative sovereignty and using a desk review and organizing the evidence through historical institutionalism as a concept, the Ghanaian case shows limited administrative sovereignty.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"22 1","pages":"298 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59726220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Methodological Americanism: Disciplinary senility and intellectual hegemonies in (American) public administration 方法论美国主义：（美国）公共管理中的学科衰老与知识霸权

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2140387

K. Moloney, Meng-Hsuan Chou, Philip D. Osei, Yonique Campbell

引用次数: 4

Public administration research in and about the MENA region—Taking stock, looking ahead 中东和北非地区的公共管理研究——展望未来

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2124744

Rahel M. Schomaker, V. Huck

引用次数: 0

Decolonization and public administration: Frustrated ramblings of a spoilsport 非殖民化和公共管理:令人扫兴的胡言乱语

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-09-14 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2112456

M. Nisar

引用次数: 2

Border securocracy: Global expansion of the U.S. Department of homeland security bureaucratic apparatus before, during and beyond covid-19 边境安全:美国国土安全部官僚机构在2019冠状病毒病之前、期间和之后的全球扩张

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-09-05 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2112454

T. Garrett

{"title":"Border securocracy: Global expansion of the U.S. Department of homeland security bureaucratic apparatus before, during and beyond covid-19","authors":"T. Garrett","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2022.2112454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2022.2112454","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The U.S. border security apparatus is moving around the globe as climate change, the coronavirus pandemic and corporatization create political and economic chaos. Global north governments seek to keep out migrants and refugees from the global south while corporations in the global north want protection to maintain their wealth. U.S. government bureaucratic agencies such as Custom and Border Protection’s Border Patrol Tactical Unit are sent abroad to expand U.S. influence in an empire of borders to train receptive government security and border forces and to regulate, detain and prevent migrants and refugees well beyond the U.S. border. Governments are waging war against the people, creating a “securocracy” comprised of profit seeking military arms corporations and allied government agents to quell resistance and border crossers. Examined are the effects and impacts of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on global border securocracy beginning with an analysis of the Mexico-U.S. border, moving to international borders in Latin America and beyond. The theoretical concept of border securocracy is expanded from the securocracy literature in the context of the north versus south globalization conflict.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"45 1","pages":"230 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43146010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Governing by protection: Studying the problematization of whistleblower protection in the EU 以保护治理:欧盟举报人保护问题化研究

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2066381

Paul Zimmermann

引用次数: 1

Transforming power dynamics through prefigurative public administration 通过预见性公共行政转变权力动态

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2022.2058289

Jeannine M. Love, Margaret Stout

引用次数: 4