30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)最新文献
{"title":"The performance of engineering students on the Group Embedded Figures Test","authors":"S. Clark, E. Seat, F. Weber","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.897625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897625","url":null,"abstract":"The Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) measures the ability of a person to disembed or pull out specified objects from a given background. The ability to disembed has been shown to be a necessary skill in problem solving and is consequently thought of as a necessary trait for individuals interested in engineering. Therefore, the GEFT has the potential to be used as a predictor of student success in an engineering program. In order to test this hypothesis, the GEFT was given to undergraduate engineering students (with both high and low academic success) and to a control group of liberal arts students at The University of Tennessee in Knoxville. The paper presents the results of the comparisons and the implications for improving engineering student performance.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"14 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131681684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A MATLAB graphical user interface for linear quadratic control design","authors":"J. Watkins, E. Mitchell","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.896594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.896594","url":null,"abstract":"The optimal linear quadratic regulator (LQR) method is a powerful technique for designing controllers for complex systems that have stringent performance requirements. For most realistic applications, the LQR problem must be solved via a computer aided design (CAD) package such as MATLAB. With the CAD packages solving the optimization problems, the challenge lies in how the weighting matrices are chosen. With experience, practising engineers become quite adept at choosing these matrices for a specific application. Students in a typical quarter or semester long course do not have the luxury of this experience. Consequently, the authors have written a MATLAB graphical user interface (GUI) that allows the students to easily tune the weighting matrices and immediately see the consequences of those changes. This paper describes the motivation behind the LQR Design GUI, the GUI construction process, and the use of the LQR Design GUI in the senior-level modern control systems course at the U.S. Naval Academy.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134201977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Vélez, S. Masten, K. Riley, L. Szymecko, T. Voice, K. Chou
{"title":"Teaching environmental risk assessment to community groups","authors":"A. Vélez, S. Masten, K. Riley, L. Szymecko, T. Voice, K. Chou","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.897648","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897648","url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. To facilitate community involvement in environmental management issues, workshops and lectures on human health risk assessment (RA) are designed for community groups. The article describes the development of lectures in risk assessment for community groups at contaminated sites. Methods of teaching and course organization are adapted to deal with the complexity and multidisciplinary nature of the subject and the heterogeneity of the audience.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"42 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133068844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Kellar, W. Hovey, M. Langerman, S. Howard, L. Simonson, L. Kjerengtroen, L. Sttler, H. Heilhecker, L. Ameson-Meyer, S. Kellogg
{"title":"A problem based learning approach for freshman engineering","authors":"J. Kellar, W. Hovey, M. Langerman, S. Howard, L. Simonson, L. Kjerengtroen, L. Sttler, H. Heilhecker, L. Ameson-Meyer, S. Kellogg","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.896561","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.896561","url":null,"abstract":"The South Dakota School of Mines and Technology began a revision of the freshman engineering curriculum in 1997. Beginning with a pilot program of 25 students, the program is now required for virtually all first-year engineering students. The program, FC 2000, utilizes a project-based learning approach and features student teams to integrate material in general engineering, mathematics, science and English. Small projects (2-3 per semester) are designed to give students an exposure to engineering design in a variety of engineering disciplines. Project components include designing and conducting experiments, analyzing data, and presentation of technical data. We present a model for the first year curriculum, preliminary assessment results, and plans for future integration.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121182793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An active/collaborative approach in teaching requirements engineering","authors":"D. Rosca","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.897606","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897606","url":null,"abstract":"The requirements engineering (RE) course is a component of the curriculum for the Masters in Software Engineering (MSSE) program at Monmouth University. It has been the first software engineering program in New Jersey and one of the first in the nation. The RE course introduces students to the process, methods and tools specific to this area, and the corresponding software quality issues. The course is offered in a lecture and laboratory format. To reinforce the concepts learned, students actively participate in their learning as they play different roles for eliciting requirements, collaboratively improve the quality of their standard requirement documents or share their particular expertise with their teams when performing object-oriented analysis. This paper describes the current structure of the RE course and my experience related to the active/collaborative approaches in teaching it.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129192726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Course Assessment and Proposal Report (CAPR)","authors":"A. Ruocco","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.897671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897671","url":null,"abstract":"One of the primary keys to accreditation under EC2000 criteria is the ability to show a process for assessment of courses within a given program. Assessment must be cyclic, that is it must identify the current state of a course, identify a plan for improvement and then indicate whether or not that plan succeeded. Assessment must also be documented. Today's environment makes it possible to track a great deal of data on almost any aspect of a course, yet it takes time to convert that data into meaningful information. If too much data is collected, then time to do subsequent assessment is lost to sifting out relevant facts from collected data. With time at a premium, the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at USMA developed a document that captures key information in a format that is inherently cyclic. This document is called the Course Assessment and Proposal Report (CAPR). It was designed in August 1999 and was used for several courses during the academic year of 1999-2000. It has been expanded and is being used for all courses within the department for academic year 2000-2001. The format of the document is evolutionary in nature and will change over time to best suit the overall needs of the department. The Course Assessment and Proposal Report has five basic sections, and a series of annexes which provide detailed information. The various sections and annexes are designed such that they can be easily extracted from the CAPR and used to support a variety of other requirements.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117203868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Predictors of student rating accuracy","authors":"T. P. McAnear, E. Seat, F. Weber","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.896603","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.896603","url":null,"abstract":"Teamwork has become an integral part of modern engineering practice. Likewise, teaching students to work effectively in teams has become an important component of engineering education. However, evaluating individual student contributions to team development and performance has been difficult. The paper explores the use of peer ratings for evaluation of individual contributions to team performance. Peer ratings are susceptible to bias when, for example, team members either unfairly gang up on an unpopular individual or protect an undeserving student. Therefore, it would be helpful to know if some students provide more accurate ratings than others and what the characteristics of accurate raters might be. The study looked for predictors of rating accuracy by comparing how an individual rated their own team behavior with how their fellow team members rated them on those same behaviors. Specifically, we used the Team Developer instrument to obtain self-ratings and team ratings on a variety of team behaviors. The discrepancy between self and peer ratings provided a measurement of rating accuracy. We then compared rating accuracy with demographic and academic variables to determine possible predictors of rating accuracy. Our results showed a tendency toward self-enhancement in the ratings across all four behavioral dimensions. Limited support was demonstrated for higher rating accuracy in higher performing students and lower accuracy in lower performing students. Implications for student evaluation are discussed, along with limitations of the study and suggestions for future research.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117230413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Innovative collaborative learning and research environments in academia and government: developing the NCSA ACCESS center","authors":"M.B. Walker, J. Thot-Thompson, K.S. Green","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.897632","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897632","url":null,"abstract":"In April, 1999, the National Science Foundation (NSF)-sponsored National Computational Science Alliance (the Alliance) opened its new 7000 square foot advanced technology training and demonstration facility in the Washington, DC metropolitan area. Called the Alliance Center for Collaboration, Education, Science, and Software (ACCESS), it is a new technology transfer and learning mechanism for emerging and advanced technologies, high performance computing, communications, and information technologies. The paper discusses the development of this highly flexible facility for collaborative research and education for high performance computing (HPC) science and engineering users. The leading edge site for ACCESS and the alliance is the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. ACCESS is staffed by NCSA. The paper discusses planning, designing and developing this innovative site, and meeting technological, aesthetic, spatial, and other challenges in setting up this multiple-use, multiple-partner center. It will make recommendations to those wishing to set up similar facilities.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114554067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Preparing for professional practice: course evaluation and implications","authors":"J. Turns, C. Atman, F. Mannering","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.896542","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.896542","url":null,"abstract":"One goal of engineering schools is to prepare students to become engineering practitioners. At the University of Washington, we have been conducting a variety of research projects devoted to the concurrent goals of (a) articulating what it means to prepare students to become engineering practitioners, (b) assessing students' preparedness for being engineering practitioners, and (c) designing and evaluating activities that promote student preparation in areas that are potentially overlooked in traditional curricula. In this paper, we focus on the evaluation of a two-credit course designed during the summer of 1999 and taught during the fall of 1999. In particular, we describe the motivations behind the course design, the primary components of the course design, and the outcome of an empirical and extensive student-based evaluation of the course. In addition, we discuss the possible implications of the evaluation results.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115180548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of an authentic, student-centered engineering project on student motivation","authors":"R. Marra, Tim Wheeler","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.896540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.896540","url":null,"abstract":"The SPIRIT (Student Projects In Rocket Investigative Techniques) project used teaching innovation and flexibility to forge a highly successful and popular two-year project course at Pennsylvania State University. A combination of traditional and non-traditional teaching methods were used to: (1) maintain a base of common knowledge pertaining to the scientific/engineering mission among a highly diverse student population, and (2) allow students to focus on the knowledge and skills of most interest to them. This paper discusses the impact of this course and project on student motivation levels as measured by the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) and student focus groups. Initial results show that, even without academic \"rewards\", SPIRIT students demonstrated a consistently high level of motivation and enthusiasm for the project. In addition, first- and second-year students rated the SPIRIT project more motivating than a comparison course to a statistically significant extent. The impact of these results in terms of future curricular reform is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127364931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}