{"title":"Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 11 June 1998 in the Case Concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria), Preliminary Objections","authors":"","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_144","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124547618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000","authors":"R. Lesaffer","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_164","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131023270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo","authors":"Lauren Amanda Sandground","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_160","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115104052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 Between the who and Egypt","authors":"C. Brölmann","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_180","url":null,"abstract":"The 1980 WHO Advisory Opinion constitutes a point of reference when it comes to enunciating the sources of obligations binding upon international organizations. It is also authoritative as it elaborates on the general legal obligations governing the relation between an organization and its host state – a relation which in this case possibly for the first time is framed by the Court as one between legal equals. Incidentally, the Court makes an articulate pronouncement on ‘political’ aspects of a question put before it. This short paper comments on the 1980 WHO Opinion and its significance, and it includes excerpts of the judicial decision.","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130621831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Case Concerning Passage Through the Great Belt","authors":"M. Lachs, R. Ago, S. Schwebel, M. Bedjaoui","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_132","url":null,"abstract":"In an Order made in the case concerning the Passage through the Great Belt (Finland v. Denmark) the Court found, unanimously, that the circumstarices, as they presented themselves to the Court, were not such as to require the exercise of its power under Article 4:l of the Statute to indicate provisional measures. The Court was composed as follows: President Sir Robert Yewdall Jennings; Vice-President Shigeru Oda; Judges: Manfred Lachs, Roberto Ago, Stephen M. Schwebel, Mohammed Bedjaoui, Ni Zhengyu, Jens Evensen, Nikoldi Tarassov, Gilbert Guillaume, Mohamed Shahabuddeen, Andrds Aguilar Mawdsley, Christopher IG. Weeramantry, Raymond Ranjeva; Judges ad hoc Paul Fischer and Bengt Broms. Judge Tarassov appended a declaration tmo the Order of the Court. Vice-Resident ODA, Judge Shahabuddeen and Judge ad hoc Broms appended separate opinions to the Order of the Court.","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114426449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide","authors":"Astrid Kjeldgaard-Pedersen","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_137","url":null,"abstract":"With its judgment in Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia-Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia) the ICJ made a valuable contribution to the theory on genocide and the interpretation of the Genocide Convention. According to the ICJ, Art. I of the Convention includes a specific duty for member states not to commit genocide. However, even though the Srebrenica massacre of July 1995 did fall within the definition of genocide, cf. Art. II, the ICJ did not find Serbia guilty of any of the crimes listed in Art. III. Serbia was merely found to have violated the obligation to prevent and punish genocide under Art. i and Art. VI. The ICJ's application of the Genocide Convention is far from uncontroversial and the judgment has consequently been substantially criticized.The article gives a thorough account for the reasoning of the ICJ and points out some of the problems that the judgment entails.","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114353048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of November 20th, 1950, in The Asylum Case","authors":"","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_075","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"17 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125835631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran","authors":"Amir Rafat","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_115","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129446804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Application for Revision and Interpretation of the Judgment of 24 February 1982 in the Case Concerning the Continental Shelf","authors":"Tunislwlibyan Arab Jamahiriya","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_120","url":null,"abstract":"In its judgment on the question concerning the application for revision and interpretation submitted by lbnisia against the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya in connection with the judgment delivered on 24 February 198% in the case of tlne Continental Shelf ('hnisiaLibyan Arab Jimahiriya), the Court, unanimously, -found inadmissible the request for revision of the Judgment of 24 February 1982; -found admissible the request for interpretation of the Judgment of 24 February 1982 as far as it related to the first sector of the delimitation cor~templated by that Judgment, stated the interpretation whiich should be made in that Espect, and stated that the submission of 'hisia relating to that sector cannot be upheld; -found that the request made by 'hnisia :for the correction of an error was without otgect, and that it was not therefore called upon to give a decision thereon; -found admissible the request for interpiretation of the Judgment of 24 February 1982 as far as it related to the most westerly point of the Gulf of Gzibes in the seco~~d sector of the delimitation contemplated by tlhat Judgment, stated the interpretation which should be mt~de in that respsct, rand stated that it cannot uphold the submiission made by 'Ibnisiia relating to that sector;","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131785000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Application for Review of Judgment No. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal","authors":"Ivor Peter Mortished","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_181","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132754853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}