Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 Between the who and Egypt

C. Brölmann
{"title":"Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 Between the who and Egypt","authors":"C. Brölmann","doi":"10.1163/9789004481237_180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 1980 WHO Advisory Opinion constitutes a point of reference when it comes to enunciating the sources of obligations binding upon international organizations. It is also authoritative as it elaborates on the general legal obligations governing the relation between an organization and its host state – a relation which in this case possibly for the first time is framed by the Court as one between legal equals. Incidentally, the Court makes an articulate pronouncement on ‘political’ aspects of a question put before it. This short paper comments on the 1980 WHO Opinion and its significance, and it includes excerpts of the judicial decision.","PeriodicalId":371708,"journal":{"name":"The World Court Reference Guide","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The World Court Reference Guide","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The 1980 WHO Advisory Opinion constitutes a point of reference when it comes to enunciating the sources of obligations binding upon international organizations. It is also authoritative as it elaborates on the general legal obligations governing the relation between an organization and its host state – a relation which in this case possibly for the first time is framed by the Court as one between legal equals. Incidentally, the Court makes an articulate pronouncement on ‘political’ aspects of a question put before it. This short paper comments on the 1980 WHO Opinion and its significance, and it includes excerpts of the judicial decision.
解释卫生组织和埃及1951年3月25日协定
在阐述对国际组织具有约束力的义务的来源时,1980年世卫组织咨询意见是一个参考点。它还具有权威性,因为它详细阐述了管理一个组织与其东道国之间关系的一般法律义务- -在本案中,这种关系可能是第一次被法院界定为法律上平等的关系。顺便说一句,法院对提交给它的问题的“政治”方面作出了明确的声明。这篇短文评论了1980年世卫组织的意见及其意义,并包括司法判决的摘录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信