Argumenta Philosophica最新文献_第10页

Ontology and Methodology in Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science: Status Quaestionis. 当代社会科学哲学的本体论与方法论:身份问题。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2003-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82235

Jeroen Van Bouwel

引用次数: 0

Emergence and Analytical Dualism. 涌现与分析二元论。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2003-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82238

Shaun Le Boutillier

引用次数: 2

The Dual Nature View of Thought Experiments. 思想实验的双重性观。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2003-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82231

Tim DE MEY

引用次数: 0

Personal Identity and its Boundaries: Philosophical Thought Experiments. 人格同一性及其边界:哲学思想实验。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2003-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82234

Farah Foucquaert

引用次数: 0

Thought Experiments in Mathematics: Anything but Proof. 数学中的思想实验:除了证明。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2003-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82229

J. P. Bendegem

{"title":"Thought Experiments in Mathematics: Anything but Proof.","authors":"J. P. Bendegem","doi":"10.21825/philosophica.82229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82229","url":null,"abstract":"It is apparently not an easy task to understand what thought experiments (TEs) could be, what they are, how they function, and so on. There are many, quite different definitions around that seem to be in conflict with one another (as the contributions to this volume will no doubt illustrate). Usually all examples of TEs come from the natural and, more exceptionally, the social sciences: Galileo' s falling bodies experiment, Newton's bucket, Einstein's light ray, Maxwell's Demon, are the prototypical cases. Occasionally, authors talk about mathematical thought experiments (MTEs). There the situation becomes even more complex: first, few authors actually believe that there are such things as MTEs and those that do believe so, put forward nearly contradictory definitions. Nevertheless, the aim of this paper is to suggest that, first, MTEs do exist, second that there is a wide class of such MTEs, and finally, that is necessary. to have MTEs in order to understand a major part of mathematical practice. The core thesis of this paper is this: if it is so that what mathematicians are searching for are proofs within the framework of a mathematical theory, then any consideration that (a) in the case where the","PeriodicalId":36843,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Philosophica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81644623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Realistic Models? Critical Realism and Statistical Models in the Social Sciences. 现实的模型吗?社会科学中的批判现实主义与统计模型。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2003-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82236

J. Pratschke

引用次数: 54

Thought Experiments Rhetoric and Possible Worlds. 思想实验、修辞学和可能世界。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2003-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82233

Benoît DE BAERE

引用次数: 0

When Unveiling the Epistemic Fallacy Ends with Committing the Ontological Fallacy. On the Contribution of Critical Realism to the Social Scientific Explanatory Practice. 当揭露认识谬误以犯本体论谬误告终时。论批判现实主义对社会科学解释实践的贡献。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2003-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82239

Jeroen Van Bouwel

引用次数: 1

Exemplifying an Internal Realist Model of Truth. 例证一个内在的现实主义模型的真理。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2002-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82248

Mark Weinstein

引用次数: 5

Moral Analogies in Print: Emblematic Thinking in the Making of Early Modern Books. 印刷中的道德类比:早期现代书籍制作中的象征思维。

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2002-01-02 DOI: 10.21825/philosophica.82246

P. Gehl

{"title":"Moral Analogies in Print: Emblematic Thinking in the Making of Early Modern Books.","authors":"P. Gehl","doi":"10.21825/philosophica.82246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82246","url":null,"abstract":"It is a commonplace in the history of the scientific revolution that ancient and medieval notions of reasoning by analogy, which united all of creation in layered realities observable in the puzzle of the world, were swept away by the triumph first of empiricism and skepticism and then of the romantic insistence on the uniqueness of the individual. Recent work shows conclusively that this development was not linear, and that the culture of print so important in the diffusion of early modern science depended on the persistence of moralizing analogy in academies and classrooms and in printing houses and bookshops. This paper offers a look at the persistence of moral, emblematic thought\" in the publishing industry of early \"modern Europe. I contend that book workers -from authors and editors to typesetters and printers -embraced emblematic thinking as a way of bridging the ethical distance between commerce and science. Their habits of translating moral analogy into print can be seen most\" clearly and unambiguously in the ways book folk devised emblematic printer's marks and shop signs to label and advertise their work on the book market. An historical case study, this paper describes practices that bear directly on our present debates over the mechanics and ethics of technological innovation and the challenge technology poses to intellectual freedom, enterprise, and the exchange of information. The paper concludes with a reflection on the ways in which contemporary design reasoning is analogous to traditional emblematic thought. Ancient and medieval notions of reasoning by analogy united all of creation in layered realities observable in the puzzle of the world and described in ebullient, cascading metaphors (Rhodes 2000; Stafford 1999; Gentner and Jeziorski 1994) . A typical medieval treatise on natural history, science, or morals was called a Speculum or mirror, and presupposed that the author and reader would find themselves fully","PeriodicalId":36843,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Philosophica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89255241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1