{"title":"Person, Property and Contract: A critical dialogue with Hegel from Marx","authors":"Christian Iber, Agemir Bavaresco","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp9-26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp9-26","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000\u0000Hegel’s Philosophy of Law deals in the Abstract Law section of the categories: person, property and contract. Research critically reconstructs this theory from a Marxist perspective. In the concept of person, first of all, the singular will is reduced to a solipsist will unrelated to intersubjectivity. Then, the concept of Hegelian property bases the private appropriation of property as the externalization of the singular will. This legal property guarantees the maintenance and reproduction of private property, that is, it will guarantee the private accumulation of capital, Marx will say. Anyway, the theory of the contract would link the autonomy of the contracting wills, however, it is a mere appearance, because, in fact, the owners’ wills are under the domination of the capitalist market, as it is explained in Marx’s Capital. The theoretical deficit of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law in general is that the legal concepts of person and property correspond to the abstract will. Hegel describes the juridical description of the legal system of the modern state as the development of free will that legitimizes the asymmetry of civil society in its socioeconomic inequalities.\u0000\u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44681846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Sobre la dialéctica contemporánea: concepto, ontología y capacidad crítica","authors":"Pablo Gres Chávez","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp151-171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp151-171","url":null,"abstract":"El propósito de este trabajo es plantear un concepto un concepto de dialéctica sin mistificaciones, siguiendo para eso la lectura que Bertell Ollman hace de la obra de Marx. En ese sentido, se comprenderá a la dialéctica como una tradición filosófica y como un método de investigación en el que la figura de Marx es fundamental, pero que puede nutrirse con la perspectiva de otros filósofos que comparten algunos de sus puntos. En segundo término, se explicará la base ontológica (o la filosofía de las relaciones internas) y el sustrato epistemológico (o el proceso de abstracción) que le permiten a la dialéctica operar. Aclarados estos aspectos, se expondrán las principales leyes o tendencias dialécticas. Con el objeto de comprender su operatividad, se caracterizará a la dialéctica como una tradición y método filosófico profundamente crítico. Finalmente se ofrecerán algunas conclusiones.","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42556533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Batallas culturales y memorialización en Chile: reflexiones sobre las posibilidades críticas y la autonomía del arte público en la posdictadura","authors":"Hernán Cuevas Valenzuela","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp193-224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp193-224","url":null,"abstract":"Este artículo se pregunta si hubo, en el Chile de la posdictadura, limitaciones a la autonomía de la producción cultural y artística sobre la memoria de eventos traumáticos. En particular, se analiza el contenido y la historia de la producción de secciones relevantes del mural Memoria Visual de una Nación del artista chileno Mario Toral. El artículo demuestra que el arte público fue una arena de lucha por los sentidos de la democratización durante la posdictadura. Para ello usa conceptos de la teoría política posestructurlista, los estudios culturales, la filosofía de la memoria y los estudios de la memoria. El artículo ofrece también una interpretación de la producción cultural como un proceso abierto y contingente. Concluye que la transición vía transacción en Chile influyó negativamente sobre el campo de producción artístico reduciendo su autonomía y divergencia respecto del discurso político dominante en el período.","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47518272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La selección genética preimplantacional frente a la crítica del modelo social de la discapacidad","authors":"Pablo Marshall","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp133-149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp133-149","url":null,"abstract":"El presente artículo analiza los principales argumentos ofrecidos por la literatura en relación con la pregunta si debe permitirse la diagnostico y selección genética preimplantacional en el contexto de técnicas de reproducción asistida con miras a evitar la presencia de una discapacidad. Las principales posiciones en el debate bioético se enfrentan a un desafío adicional cuando se consideran las críticas provenientes del discurso sobre la discapacidad. De este modo, cuando la dimensión social opresiva de la discapacidad es tomada en cuenta, ella resulta en una serie de cuestionamientos que podrían poner en entredicho las conclusiones más decantadas del debate bioético. Sin embargo, el modelo social no ha estado exento de críticas y una de ellas, la minusvaloración de la importancia de características de origen biológico frente a una discapacidad de origen social, resuena particularmente en el debate sobre selección genética preimplantacional.","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41338025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Fenomenologia do Espírito de Hegel em diálogo com o idealismo alemão: o saber absoluto como a última figura do espírito","authors":"J. Pertille","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp117-131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp117-131","url":null,"abstract":"Os dois objetivos desse texto são: oferecer uma exposição geral sobre a originalidade da Fenomenologia do Espírito de Hegel na trajetória do Idealismo Alemão, e delinear uma sucinta apresentação mais específica sobre o papel do último capítulo dessa obra, dedicado ao “saber absoluto”, na estratégia argumentativa daquela ciência da experiência da consciência. O significado e o papel do conceito de Absoluto em Hegel e em seu desenvolvimento histórico é estudado, especialmente a partir de sua diferença com a filosofia de Schelling.","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48510181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introducción de los Editores Invitados: Hegel en diálogo","authors":"H. Ferreiro, V. Duplancic","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp7-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp7-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47063126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Hegel y la doble transformación del concepto de realidad sobre el trasfondo de la crítica de Kant al Inbegriff aller Realität","authors":"Hardy Neumann","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp101-116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp101-116","url":null,"abstract":"En el marco de un diálogo entre Kant y Hegel, el siguiente artículo da cuenta de algunos aspectos de la recepción efectuada por Hegel, en la Lógica del ser, de la así llamada noción de Inbegriff aller Realität. Se trata de una noción que Hegel recoge y examina no sólo expositivamente, sino dialéctico especulativamente. El trabajo busca identificar y explicar en sus conexiones claves los momentos a través de los cuales Hegel, en el ámbito del desarrollo de una lógica pura, convierte, en un primer paso, la realidad en negación y, luego, en un segundo paso, en contradicción. ","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49406511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Soberanía y guerra en la Filosofía del derecho de Hegel","authors":"E. Mizrahi","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp79-99","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp79-99","url":null,"abstract":"En este trabajo se intenta esclarecer los fundamentos conceptuales de la soberanía en la Filosofía del Derecho de Hegel con el propósito de brindar una respuesta a esta pregunta y estar así en condiciones de evaluar los alcances del soberanismo contemporáneo y lo ajustado de sus pretensiones. Como se verá, Hegel construye su propia posición en diálogo crítico con los abordajes de Hobbes y Kant, con referencias más o menos explícitas. El desarrollo de este artículo está dividido en tres partes. En la primera, (a) se presenta la concepción hegeliana de la soberanía en el marco de su comprensión organicista del Estado, atendiendo tanto a su aspecto interior como exterior. En la segunda, (b) se analizan los fundamentos teóricos de la guerra en Hegel y su posición respecto de las relaciones internacionales. Por último, (c) se discuten los alcances del soberanismo en la actualidad a la luz del pensamiento hegeliano.","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49643675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Axel Honneth’s Dialogue on Hegel’s Philosophy of Law","authors":"Werner Euler","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp45-64","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp45-64","url":null,"abstract":"This article has two purposes. First, it aims to present a detailed analysis of the argument of “recognition” or even of the “fight for recognition”, which Hegel uses in his fragments from Jena treating of the system of philosophy, especially of the philosophy of spirit. It will be necessary to determine precedently by means of an exact interpretation the content of that expressions, in order to criticize and to compare, his original significance in Hegel with the theoretical application made by Honneth. The special aim hereby is to correct and to explain the function of the “fight for recognition”, even in its sharpening significance as a “fight for life and death”, with relation to the genesis of the state of right. Second, the figure of “recognition” is related to Hegel’s Philosophy of right in the version of 1820. In this work, recognition participates in the theory of “institutions” which is analyzed by Honneth as well. Apart from the merits gained through the endeavour to introduce a classic philosophical theory into a conception of justice in society, we feel obliged to state an error in Honneth‘s interpretation in so far as he understands an institution as a simple social community of communication (or as intersubjective community). For that reason, a conclusion based on a critical commentary can only include a negative recommendation, that means, not to follow those traces of interpretation but rather to defend and to consult the texts originally composed by Hegel.","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47331696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Notion of Process: Hegel and Contemporary Metaphysics","authors":"M. Bordignon","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp27-44","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp27-44","url":null,"abstract":"This article is aimed at highlighting some possible contributions of Hegel’s philosophy to the contemporary debate around process metaphysics. In the contemporary metaphysical debate, process metaphysics represent an attempt to highlight the limits of the traditional philosophical paradigm, which is based on the notion of substance, and to work within an alternative paradigm, which is based on the notion of process. What exists, then, are not substances, substrates, fixed and stable objects characterized by certain properties, but processes, events, occurrences. The main idea of process metaphysics is that being is dynamic and that this dynamic nature must be the main focus of any comprehensive philosophical explanation of reality. Looking at this revolution, it is necessary to define the very notion of process. In fact, this work of conceptual clarification of the fundamental notion of this new philosophical paradigm is still ongoing. My idea is that Hegelian philosophy can offer some relevant indications to do the job. In this sense, the article will be divided into two parts: on the basis of the analysis of some definitions of the notion of process in the contemporary debate around process metaphysics, I will show 1) the need to determine the minimal ontological structure of the notion of process; 2) the possibility of determining this structure through some conceptual tools provided by Hegel’s logic and in the Lectures on the History of Philosophy.","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46127749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}