Administrative Law and Governance Journal最新文献

{"title":"Analisis Yuridis Kebijakan Keuangan Negara dalam Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 Melalui Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2020","authors":"Henny Juliani","doi":"10.14710/alj.v3i2.329-348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i2.329-348","url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 pandemic as non-nature disaster due to its impact on health, social, and economy as well, made the President attempted to treat them with public finance policy as implementation of  his discretion authority in ruling the government during pandemic. This research was conducted by using empirical juridic approach, focused on analytical descriptive  and the result was analyzed qualitatively. The result shows that Perpu No. 1 of 2020 that approved by The House later, represented is a constitutional discretion. In the operational aspect the Government published many regulations to follow up of  Perppu Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 that used to resolve emergency condition due to COVID-19, therefore, government officers got immunity in implementing their duties based on goodwill and in accordance with regulations. Keywords: COVID-19, discretion, public finance AbstrakPandemi covid-19 yang berdampak pada bidang kesehatan, sosial, maupun ekonomi sebagai bencana non alam, membawa Presiden untuk melakukan upaya penanganannya dengan kebijakan keuangan negara, sebagai implementasi kewenangan diskresi dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis dan hasilnya dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menampakkan bahwa Perpu Nomor 1 Tahun 2020, yang kemudian disetujui DPR dan menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 merupakan diskresi konstitusional. Dalam tataran teknis operasional pemerintah juga mengeluarkan berbagai peraturan kebijakan sebagai tindak lanjut dari Perppu Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 yang digunakan sebagai upaya dalam menangani keadaan genting sebagai akibat pandemi covid-19, oleh karena itu pejabat pemerintahan mendapatkan imunitas dalam melaksanakan tugasnya jika didasarkan pada itikad baik dan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Kata kunci: COVID-19, diskresi, keuangan negara","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122238117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rules and Policies Related with Good Governance When Corona Virus 2019 (COVID19) Pandemic","authors":"Solechan Solechan","doi":"10.14710/alj.v3i2.206-219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i2.206-219","url":null,"abstract":"The policy made by the government in relation to COVID 19, became a quite heated discussion among the community. In fact, many observers are questioning the policy. At present, the government is faced with two choices, namely maintaining the lives of citizens or maintaining the economy. Policies taken by the government must be based on the principle of good governance. The principle of good governance is an important principle in making policy. One of the principles in good governance is the principle of community participation. Through this research, we will see how community participation is related to policies made by the government, moreover, public awareness is still lacking related to government policies to deal with this pandemic. Keywords: Government, principle, community participation Abstrak Kebijakan yang dibuat oleh pemerintah terkait dengan COVID 19, menjadi pembahasan yang cukup hangat dikalangan masyarakat. Bahkan, para pengamat banyak yang mempersoalkan kebijakan tersebut. Saat ini, pemerintah dihadapkan dengan dua pilihan, yaitu mempertahankan nyawa warga negara atau mempertahankan perekonomian. Kebijakan yang diambil oleh pemerintah, harus didasari oleh prinsip good governance. Prinsip good governance ini menjadi prinsip yang penting dalam mengambil kebijakan. Salah satu prinsip yang ada di good governance adalah prinsip partisipasi masyarakat. Melalui penelitian ini, kita akan melihat bagaimana partisipasi masyarakat terkait kebijakan yang dibuat oleh pemerintah, terlebih lagi, kesadaran masyarakat yang masih kurang terkait dengan kebijakan pemerintah untuk menangani pandemi ini. Keywords: Pemerintah, Prinsip, Partisipasi Masyarakat","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"6 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115266739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Larangan Ultra Vires (Exces De Pouvoir) dalam Tindakan Pemerintahan (Studi Komparasi Konsep antara Sistem Hukum Anglo Saxon dan Sistem Hukum Kontinental)","authors":"S. Susanto","doi":"10.14710/alj.v3i2.260-271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i2.260-271","url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine the use of authority by government agencies is legality. Specifically, to find out more about the prohibition of Ultra Vires (Exces De Pouvoir) in Government Actions (Comparative Study of Concepts between the Anglo Saxon Law System and the Continental Legal System). The results of the study indicate that First, the form of government agency action prohibition in the form of excès de pouvoir (ultra vires), both in the Anglo Saxon legal system (Britain, USA, Australia, etc.) and Continental especially France includes also the prohibition of abuse of authority (abuse of power, detournement de pouvoir). Second, the Prohibition of abuse of authority (detournement de pouvoir) in France has been developed into 3 (three) variants, namely the Administrative Agency has the purpose / aims to achieve goals that are entirely other than the public interest, and as a personal goal. Keywords: Prohibition of Ultra Vires, Government Actions, Legal System. Abstrak Penelitian inimbertujuan untuk mengetahui Larangan Ultra Vires (Exces De Pouvoir)  dalam Tindakan Pemerintahan (Studi Komparasi Konsep  Antara Sistem Hukum Anglo Saxon Dan Sistem Hukum Kontinental). Hasil penelitian menjukan bahwa Pertama, Bentuk larangan tindakan badan pemerintah yang berupa excès de pouvoir  (ultra vires), baik dalam sistem hukum Anglo Saxon (Inggris, USA, Australia, dll)  maupun Kontinental khususnya Prancis meliputi juga larangan penyalahgunaan wewenang (abuse of power, detournement de pouvoir). Kedua, Larangan penyalahgunaan wewenang (detournement de pouvoir) di Prancis telah dikembangkan ke dalam 3 (tiga) varian, yaitu Badan Administrasi memiliki tujuan/bertujuan untuk mencapai tujuan yang sepenuhnya selain bagi kepentingan umum, dan sebagai tujuan pribadi. Kata Kunci: Larangan Ultra Vires, Tindakan Pemerintahan, Sistem Hukum.","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122732238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prinsip Good Corporate Governane dalam Pengelolaan Pungutan Sumbangan Pihak Ketiga Pada Perum Perhutani Jateng","authors":"Rinitami Njatrijani","doi":"10.14710/ALJ.V2I3.493-498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/ALJ.V2I3.493-498","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to know the Principles of Good Corporate Governance in the Management of Third Party Contribution Donations at the Perum Perhutani Central Java. Research is a study of legal documents described in a qualitative form. The results of the study show that the effort to maintain the implementation of the core business and the Perum Perhutani business plan, in order to mitigate the risk of the relationship between Perhutani and Central Java Province, it is necessary to consider terminating the SP3 levy and turning it into a PNBP as stipulated in Law Number 20 of 1997 concerning Revenue Non-Tax State with all the consequences as regulated Article 4: All Non-Tax State Revenues must be paid immediately as soon as possible to the State Treasury, and Article 5: All Non-Tax State Revenues are managed in the State Budget and Revenue System, then it is necessary to formulate a basis for arranging grants to the Government Central Java Province with the approval of the Minister of Finance. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Third Party Charges, Perhutani. Abstark Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengatahui Prinsip Good Corporate Governane dalam Pengelolaan Pungutan Sumbangan Pihak Ketiga  Pada Perum Perhutani Jateng. Penelitian merupakan penelitian dokumen hukum yang diuraikan dalam bentuk kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menujukan bahwa upaya menjaga dilaksanakannya core bussines maupun bussines plan Perum Perhutani maka dalam rangka mitigasi risiko hubungan antara perum perhutani dengan Propinsi Jawa Tengah maka perlu dipertimbangkan untuk memberhentkan pungutan SP3 dan merubah menjadi PNBP sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomer 20 Tahun 1997 tentang Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak  dengan segala konsekuensinya sebagaimana diatur Pasal 4 : Seluruh Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak wajib disetor langsung secepatnya ke Kas Negara, dan  Pasal 5:  Seluruh Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak dikelola dalam sistem Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara , selanjutnya perlu  dirumuskan dasar pengaturan hibah  kepada Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah dengan persetujuan Menteri Keuangan. Kata Kunci: Good Corporate Governance, Pungutan Pihak Ketiga, Perhutani.","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130637050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Upaya Strategis Pemerintah Kota Surakarta dalam Mewujudkan Profesionalisme Sumber Daya Manusia Aparatur","authors":"Henny Juliani","doi":"10.14710/ALJ.V2I3.436-449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/ALJ.V2I3.436-449","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The professionalism of human resources of public servants in executing public service tasks, governmental tasks, and specific development tasks are often perceived with bad stigma, particularly in negative issues on quality and performance aspects. Based on this fact, Government of Surakarta Municipality perform strategic efforts in improving the professionalism of human resources of public servants to their quality and performance will increase as well as can realizing prime services to the citizen.  This research uses an empirical juridical approach. While the specification of the research is analytical descriptive, and the source of data comprises of primary and secondary data. The result of research was analyzed quantitatively.   Based on the research, it can be concluded that in improving the professionalism of human resources of public servants, the Government of Surakarta Municipality perform strategic efforts, namely: 1. They are fulfilling demand of number of human resources of public servants with specific qualification, 2 and improving capacity and quality of human resources of public servants that relevant to improve their competency, 3 and applying e-Performance as a system to evaluate performance of human resources of public servants in manage personal work load as well as organization, performance indicator achievement as a basic calculation of work achievement and incentive reward, 4 and applying discipline penalty in accordance to behavior of human resources of public servants. Strategic efforts of Government of Surakarta Municipality complied with the regulation of PerMenPan dan RB No.38 Year 2018 regarding Measurement of Professionalism of Human Resources of Public Servants, which is measured by using 4 (four) dimension, comprises of a. Qualification, b. Competence, c. Performance, and d. Discipline.      Keywords: Public Servants, Government Of Surakarta Municipality Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui upaya strategis pemerintah Kota Surakarta dalam mewujudkan profesionalisme sumber daya manusia aparatur.  Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis empiris. Adapun spesifikasi penelitian adalah deskriptif analitis, dengan sumber data yang diperoleh secara primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian selanjutnya akan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, maka dapat diketahui bahwa dalam meningkatkan profesionalisme SDM Aparatur, Pemerintah Kota Surakarta melakukan upaya strategis yang berupa: 1. Pemenuhan kebutuhan jumlah SDM Aparatur dengan kualifikasi tertentu, 2. Peningkatan kapasitas dan kualitas SDM Aparatur, yang berkaitan dengan peningkatan kompetensi, 3. Penerapan E-Kinerja sebagai sistem penilaian kinerja SDM Aparatur dalam mengelola beban kerja personil maupun organisasi, capaian indikator kinerja sebagai dasar perhitungan prestasi kerja serta pemberian insentif kerja, 4. Penerapan hukuman disiplin yang berkaitan dengan  perilaku kerja SDM Aparatur. Upaya strategis yang d","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134229628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Penegasan Politik Hukum Desentralisasi Asimetris dalam Rangka Menata Hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dengan Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia","authors":"K. Wibawa","doi":"10.14710/ALJ.V2I3.400-412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/ALJ.V2I3.400-412","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The legal politics of Article 18, Article 18A and Article 18B of the UUDNRI 1945 (Indonesian Constitution) do not strictly state that Indonesia adheres to the concept of asymmetric decentralization in the administration of local government. Until now, Indonesia does not yet have a grand design of asymmetric decentralization policy. The asymmetrical idea runs by itself without having its main design. Indonesia needs to affirm its asymmetrical decentralization policy to ensure the implementation of local government by the politic of law in the UUDNRI 1945. The establishment of a basic law on asymmetric decentralization is one way to emphasize that Indonesia adheres to asymmetric devolution in the operation of central government relations with local governments. The construction of the act that is built remains in the spirit of decentralization rather than centralization is carried out asymmetrically rather than symmetrically, and remains within the framework of the United States of the Republic of Indonesia. The act becomes the lex genres of all laws relating to the broadest local autonomy and special autonomy. Keywords: Asymmetric Decentralization, Local Government, Central Government, Autonomy. Abstrak Politik hukum Pasal 18, Pasal 18A, dan Pasal 18B UUDNRI 1945 menyatakan secara tidak tegas bahwa Indonesia menganut konsep desentralisasi asimetris dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Indonesia sampai saat ini belum memiliki grand design kebijakan desentralisasi asimetris. Konsep asimetris berjalan dengan sendirinya tanpa ada design utamanya. Indonesia perlu penegasan kebijakan desentralisasi asimetris untuk menjamin penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah sesuai politik hukum dalam UUDNRI 1945. Pembentukan undang-undang pokok mengenai desentralisasi asimetris merupakan salah satu cara untuk menegaskan bahwa Indonesia menganut desentralisasi asimetris dalam penyelenggaraan hubungan pemerintah pusat dengan pemerintah daerah. Konstruksi undang-undang yang dibangun tetap dengan semangat desentralisasi bukan sentralisasi, dijalankan secara asimetris bukan simetris dan tetap dalam bingkai Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Undang-undang tersebut menjadi lex generelis dari semua undang-undang yang terkait dengan otonomi daerah seluas-luasnya, otonomi khusus, dan otonomi istimewa. Kata kunci: Desentralisasi Asimetris, Pemerintah Daerah, Pemerintah Pusat, Otonomi.","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131175311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Implikasi Penyalagunaan Wewenang Administrasi Dalam Seleksi Perangkat Desa Kabupaten Demak","authors":"Muhamad Azhar","doi":"10.14710/ALJ.V2I3.450-453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/ALJ.V2I3.450-453","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to find out how the implications of the abuse of Administrative Authority in the Village Apparatus Selection in Demak Regency. The research is a concise study based on cases that were consulted at the Legal Consultation Board, Faculty of Law, University of Diponegoro. Research Results Aimed that the abuse of authority occurred in the process of selecting village officials in Demak Regency. The authority to determine the selection committee of the village apparatus is the authority of the Village Head as mandated by the Law - Invitation on the Village, and not the authority of the Regent of Demak Regency. Keywords: Power Utilization, Village Officials, Demak Regency.  Abstrak  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengtahui bagaimana implikasi penyalagunaan Wewenang Administrasi Dalam Seleksi Perangkat Desa di Kabupaten Demak. Penelitian merupakan kajian ringkas berdasarkan pada kasus yang dikonsultasikan pada Badan Konsultasi Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro. Hasil Penelitian Menujukan bahwa penyalagunaan wewenang terjadi pada proses seleksi perangkat desa di Kabupaten Demak. Kewenangan untuk menetapkan panitian seleksi perangkat desa merupakan kewenangan dari Kepala Desa sebagaimana amanat Peraturan Perundang – Undangan tentang Desa, dan bukan berada pada kewenangan Bupati Kabupaten Demak. Kata Kunci: Penyalagunaan Wewenang, Perangkat Desa, Kabupaten Demak.","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124596270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Peran Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif","authors":"Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja","doi":"10.14710/ALJ.V2I4.677-685","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/ALJ.V2I4.677-685","url":null,"abstract":"In the Lex Silencio Positivo cases, there is no Consultative Meeting and Preparatory Examination. Meanwhile, the two examinations are necessary. This research intends to explore the Role of Judges in Lex Silencio Positivo cases where the Judge does not get a particular stage to examine the Applicants' petition files, both formal and material terms. This study uses the normative juridical method. The results of this study Judges play an essential role in distributing the burden of evidence fairly. The Judge should also carefully examine the Applicants' petition files to prevent the misuse of Positive Fictitious Decisions by the Applicants Keywords: Judges, Lex Silencio Positivo, Evidence. AbstrakPada Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif tidak ada Rapat Permusyawaratan dan Pemeriksaan Persiapan karena sifatnya yang berupa permohonan. Sementara kedua pemeriksaan tersebut penting karena untuk memeriksa dari segi formil dan segi materiil. Penelitian ini hendak menggali Peran Hakim pada Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Fiktif Positif di mana Hakim tidak mendapatkan tahapan khusus untuk memeriksa berkas Permohonan Pemohon baik dari segi formil maupun materiil. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dalam. Hasil dari penelitian ini Hakim memegang peranan penting dalam membagi beban pembuktian secara adil. Hakim juga harus memeriksa dengan teliti berkas Permohonan Pemohon untuk mencegah terjadinya penyalahgunaan Keputusan Fiktif Positif oleh Pemohon. Kata Kunci : Hakim, Keputusan Fiktif Positif, Pembuktian.","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127381004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) Kesehatan Sebagai Pelayanan Publik","authors":"Solechan Solechan","doi":"10.14710/ALJ.V2I4.686-696","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/ALJ.V2I4.686-696","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this research is to find out how the role of the health insurance provider (BPJS) as a form of public service in Indonesia. Research is a normative study with a comparative approach. The research results show that public services or public services can be defined as all forms of services, both in the way of goods and services which in principle are the responsibility and are carried out by government agencies at the central, regional and in the environment of state-owned enterprises or business entities Regional Owned. One of them is the Social Security Organizing Agency is a legal entity to organize social security programs to ensure all people can meet the basic needs of a decent life. BPJS is held based on the principles of humanity, benefits, and social justice for all Indonesian people with the aim of realizing the fulfillment of the basic needs of a decent life for every Indonesian people who have become basic human rights. Keywords: Social Security Organizing Agency, Health, Public Services Abstract Penelitian ini bertujuan utnuk mengetahui bagaimanakah peran badan penyelenggara jaminan sosial (BPJS) kesehatan sebagai salah satu bentuk pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Penelitian merupakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menujukan bahwa Pelayanan publik atau pelayanan umum dapat didefinisikan sebagai segala bentuk jasa pelayanan, baik dalam bentuk barang maupun jasa yang pada prinsipnya menjadi tanggung jawab dan dilaksanakan oleh Instansi Pemerintah di Pusat, di Daerah, dan di lingkungan Badan Usaha Milik Negara atau Badan Usaha Milik Daerah. Salah satunya adalah Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial merupakan sebuah badan hukum untuk menyelenggarakan program jaminan sosial untuk menjamin seluruh rakyat agar dapat memenuhi kebutuhan dasar hidup yang layak. BPJS diselenggarakan berdasarkan asas kemanusiaan, manfaat, dan keadilan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia dengan tujuan untuk mewujudkan pemenuhan kebutuhan dasar hidup yang layak bagi setiap rakyat Indonesia yang sudah menjadi hak dasar manusia. Kata Kunci: Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial, Kesehatan, Pelayanan Publik ","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128056171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Dualisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Permohonan Informasi Publik","authors":"Kartika Widya Utama, Yudhitiya Dyah Sukmadewi","doi":"10.14710/ALJ.V2I4.672","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14710/ALJ.V2I4.672","url":null,"abstract":"Public Information Transparency after 1998 reformation has gained momentum since the issuance of Law No. 14 of 2008 concerning Transparency of Public Information. Public access to obtain information owned by the state administrative body does not always run smoothly. The role of the Administrative Court as a Judiciary that guarantees the upholding of Good Public Order Principles, especially the principle of public transparency, was tested. This article will discuss the extent of the role of PTUN in disputes over requests for public information, which in the process will also discuss the part of the Public Information Commission in requests for public information in terms of authority and competence. As a conceptual article, the conclusion that can be drawn is that the state administrative dispute procedure needs to be clearly stated, whether it is mandatory to use the procedure for requesting public information through the Public Information Commission or whether it can use a claim mechanism through the State Administrative Court. Keyword: Open Government, Administrative Court, Good Governance Principle Abstrak Keterbukaan Informasi Publik pasca reformasi semakin mendapatkan momentum semenjak diterbitkannya Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik. Akses masyarakat untuk mendapatkan informasi yang dimiliki oleh badan administrasi negara tidak selalu berjalan dengan lancar. Peran PTUN sebagai Badan Peradilan yang menjamin tegaknya Asas-asas Umum Ketertiban yang Baik khususnya asas keterbukaan publik pun diuji. Artikel ini akan membahas sejauh mana peran dari PTUN dalam sengketa permohonan informasi publik yang dalam prosesnya akan membahas pula mengenai peran Komisi Informasi Publik dalam permohonan informasi publik dari sisi kewenangan dan kompetensi. Sebagai artikel konseptual, kesimpulan yang dapat diambil adalah perlu ditegaskan dengan jelas prosedur sengketa administrasi negara apakah diwajibankan menggunakan prosedur permohonan informasi publik melalui Komisi Informasi Publik ataukah dapat menggunakan mekanisme gugatan melalui Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Kata Kunci: Keterbukaan informasi publik, PTUN, Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik","PeriodicalId":367296,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law and Governance Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125530640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}