Contrastive Pragmatics最新文献_第7页

On the Intersection between Variational and Contrastive Pragmatics: An Analysis of Requests for Repair in Complaints by German-Speaking Belgians 变分语用学与对比语用学的交集——对比利时德语区投诉中修护要求的分析

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-00001056

Katja Lochtman

引用次数: 2

Pragmatic Particles: Findings from Asian Languages, written by Kiaer, Jieun 《语用小品:来自亚洲语言的发现》，基尔、杰恩著

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-bja10044

Faizah Sari

引用次数: 0

Front matter 前页

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-00301000

引用次数: 0

Addressing, Greeting and Related Gestures in the Opening Sequences of Finnish, French and Hungarian YouTube Videos 芬兰语、法语和匈牙利语YouTube视频开头的称呼、问候和相关手势

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-02-18 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-bja10042

Johanna Isosävi, Ildikó Vecsernyés

引用次数: 4

Fixed Expressions: Building language structure and social action, edited by Ritva Laury and Tsuyoshi Ono 《固定表达:构建语言结构与社会行为》，丽特瓦·劳里、小野刚主编

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-02-11 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-bja10041

Jan Lindström

引用次数: 1

Response Cries or Response Statements? A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Interjectional Expressions in Japanese and English 响应呼叫还是响应声明?日语和英语感叹词的跨语言分析

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-02-10 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-bja10038

Mitsuko Narita Izutsu, Yong-Taek Kim, Katsunobu Izutsu

引用次数: 1

Language Socialization in Classrooms: Culture, Interaction, and Language Development, edited by Matthew J. Burdelski and Kathryn M. Howard 《课堂中的语言社会化:文化、互动和语言发展》，作者:马修·j·伯德尔斯基和凯瑟琳·m·霍华德

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-01-27 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-bja10039

Akira Takada

引用次数: 0

Interview with Anne Wichmann 采访安妮·维克曼

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-bja10037

Themis P. Kaniklidou

{"title":"Interview with Anne Wichmann","authors":"Themis P. Kaniklidou","doi":"10.1163/26660393-bja10037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10037","url":null,"abstract":"Pragmatic meaning is a very important aspect of human communication, but what makes it interesting is its mysterious and slippery nature. Most nonlinguists tend to think of meaning only in terms of what words mean, but in pragmatics one must account for what people mean. It’s interesting because it is invisible: we know it’s there, but we can’t often identify why it’s there. I also think that pragmatics is interesting from a methodological point of view. There are different approaches to pragmatics. There is Austin and Searle’s Speech Act Theory, derived from philosophy, which has become more of a sociological-ethnographical approach to pragmatics. This approach highlights what speakers intend rather than what listeners interpret, but it also requires a profound understanding of the context in which things are spoken. There is also the cognitive approach of Relevance Theory, although it worries me that this approach is often based on introspection and invented data. Then there is the strict conversation analysis approach which focuses on close detail and only accepts evidence from participants’ responses. In my experience, the analysis can be so close that it is very difficult to stand back from individual examples to make generalizations. In my own work, I have mostly used speech corpora, in other words transcribed recordings of spoken language, allowing me to look at the frequencies and distribution of data, along with the immediate context and co-text. There are many areas that are interesting for pragmatics, ranging from basic speech acts to turn-taking and the whole area of politeness and especially impoliteness. Also, it’s worth looking at pragmatics from a developmental perspective, i.e., how children learn. For example, children often take things literally, so if you say on the telephone “Is your mummy there?”, they think it’s a question, rather than a request to speak to the mother. How and when do they learn this? So pragmatic meaning is interesting from the perspective of child language acquisition. There is also a lot of interest in historical investigations","PeriodicalId":367211,"journal":{"name":"Contrastive Pragmatics","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125567303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Contrast, Contact, Convergence? Afrikaans and English Modal Auxiliaries in South African Parliamentary Discourse (1925–1985) 对比，接触，融合?南非议会话语中的南非荷兰语和英语情态助动词(1925-1985)

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-bja10033

Bertus van Rooy, H. Kotze

引用次数: 0

Native-like Performance of Pragmatic Features: Speech Acts in Spanish 语用特征的母语表现:西班牙语的言语行为

Contrastive Pragmatics Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI: 10.1163/26660393-bja10034

Marta Vacas Matos, A. Cohen

{"title":"Native-like Performance of Pragmatic Features: Speech Acts in Spanish","authors":"Marta Vacas Matos, A. Cohen","doi":"10.1163/26660393-bja10034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10034","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This study had as its goal to investigate how nonnative speakers (NNSs) of Spanish were able to perform pragmatics which in various ways resembled that of native speakers (NSs). The study focused on three advanced NNSs of Spanish who had contributed data six years earlier to a corpus of NS and NNS speech acts of complimenting, apologizing and refusing. The purpose was to do a contrastive analysis comparing the pragmatic performance of NNSs and NSs in order to capture both similarities and areas where highly competent NNSs displayed knowledge gaps, however subtle.\u0000The subjects responded to a language background questionnaire regarding their learning of Spanish and also completed a learning style preference survey. They were then asked to revisit their earlier performance in pragmatics from the corpus data and to describe the strategies that they used to produce their highly-rated performance in Spanish pragmatics at that time. The findings revealed ways in which the three subjects differentially imitated NS behavior, and provided insights as to how they arrived at native-like behavior in their facial expressions, use of clicks, physical contact practices, colloquial language, and cursing. The subjects’ reported learning style preferences appeared to be generally consistent with the strategies that they reported using for dealing with the pragmatic features of interest, such as the way that they dealt with cursing.","PeriodicalId":367211,"journal":{"name":"Contrastive Pragmatics","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125356088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5