{"title":"A lexical and contrastive analysis of zì字","authors":"Françoise Bottéro","doi":"10.1177/25138502241242809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25138502241242809","url":null,"abstract":"Today, one of the most essential Chinese linguistic terms related to writing, zì 字, is translated into English and other western languages as “character”. This article points out the terminological and conceptual problem related to this translation as soon as one is entering the field of precise linguistic analysis. By analysing the lexical development of the term from pre-Qin documents, the Shuō wén jiě zì dictionary, to modern times and the introduction of cí “word”, it shows that zì 字 was never limited to graphs nor graphemes. It introduces the way zì 字 was used to describe the Indian writing systems around the fifth century, and how it was understood outside China: in Asia, by those who borrowed the Chinese writing, and in Europe, by the first missionaries.","PeriodicalId":36639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Writing Systems","volume":"1 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141101186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Analyzing radical positions and semantic relationships","authors":"Eun Young Jang","doi":"10.1177/25138502241230682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25138502241230682","url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed 10 pairs of characters (a total of 20 characters) from the Shuowen Jiezi constructed with the same radicals. The analysis demonstrated that even when characters were composed of the same radicals, variations in their structural composition resulted in significantly different meanings. This discrepancy arose from whether the radical played the semantic role or phonetic role in character formation. The analysis showed clearly that among characters with the same radical structure, there were instances where extended semantic relationships could be inferred. Chinese characters, being predominantly ideographic, often have multiple meanings, and some meanings may evolve to lead to the development of new characters, enhancing semantic differentiation. It could be argued that this process gave rise to new characters through simple adjustments in the positions of the same radicals.","PeriodicalId":36639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Writing Systems","volume":"133 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140251400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction: Graphemic classifiers in complex script systems","authors":"O. Goldwasser, Zev Handel","doi":"10.1177/25138502241234025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25138502241234025","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the role of unpronounced semantic classifiers, also known as graphemic classifiers or determinatives, in three ancient complex scripts: Egyptian, Chinese and Sumerian. These classifiers are silent hieroglyphs, Chinese characters or cuneiform signs that are combined with other signs that carry phonetic information to form a complete written representation of a word. While these classifiers are written and visible, they are not pronounced. They add silent, motivated semantic information related to the meaning of the word. These classifiers can be found in various positions within words, reflecting cultural and referential information. Classifier studies, in general, have gained significant interest at the intersection of linguistic typology, cognitive linguistics, semiotics of scripts and neuroscience. The research field examines classifiers in oral languages, signed languages and complex scripts, emphasizing that regardless of modality they reflect a shared cognitive effort to organize knowledge. It is our hope that the scholarly contributions in this issue will open up a new chapter in classifier studies and in comparative script analysis. Theoretical and analytical work undertaken in the last few decades has been done primarily by individual researchers specializing in one language or script. Our approach combines large-scale corpus data with comparative script analysis carried out by teams of collaborators who can contribute specialized expertise in different ancient writing systems. The research possibilities opened by our newly developed digital tool iClassifier are presented in detail in the other contributions in this issue. This work has laid a strong comparative foundation that we can now build on, to develop new insights into the early history of script development and the commonalities and differences among ancient cultural conceptualizations of the world.","PeriodicalId":36639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Writing Systems","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140401756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editor’s Word","authors":"Zang Kehe","doi":"10.1177/25138502241236024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25138502241236024","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Writing Systems","volume":"53 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140407163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Classification in Sumerian cuneiform and the implementation of iClassifier","authors":"Gebhard J. Selz, Bo Zhang","doi":"10.1177/25138502231215875","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25138502231215875","url":null,"abstract":"Sumerian, an agglutinative language of unknown affiliation, surfaced in mankind’s earliest written sources around 3300 BCE. It continued to play a salient role in the transmission of cuneiform cultures for more than three millennia, even after its disappearance as a vernacular (around 2000 BCE). From its beginnings, semantic classification played an important role in this initially predominantly semasiographic-ideographic script. Here, such classifications are contrasted with and compared to the normalized ‘consolidated’ standard set of pre- and post-nominal classifiers – generally known as ‘determinatives’ – which function chiefly as sortal classifiers. It is further suggested here that the relationship between classifying nouns and classified nouns is best described in terms of nominal apposition. This article further provides updated examples of how the relevant information was entered into the iClassifier digital tool, specially designed for such comparisons in order to improve our understanding of how cuneiform classifiers mark their host words and to make them comparable with similar features in other complex scripts and other languages. We will then briefly survey how the answers to queries in the iClassifier may help to illuminate ‘the diverse mindsets of ancient Mesopotamia’.","PeriodicalId":36639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Writing Systems","volume":"16 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140438723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The buy-one-get-(almost)-one-free effect of learning traditional or simplified Chinese characters","authors":"Su-Ching Lin, Jenn-Yeu Chen","doi":"10.1177/25138502231219798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25138502231219798","url":null,"abstract":"A set of simplified Chinese characters (k = 995) and their traditional counterparts were presented to habitual traditional and simplified Chinese users, respectively, for recognition. The results showed an accuracy rate of at least 85% in the recognition of simplified characters by traditional Chinese users and in the recognition of traditional characters by simplified Chinese users. Additionally, it took the traditional Chinese users about 2.4 rounds of exposure to correct answers to learn and correctly identify all the simplified characters; it took the simplified Chinese users about 1.8 rounds to learn the traditional ones to the same effect. The results indicate that once the learners have mastered one script, the substantial overlaps between the two, along with a simple feedback for learning, enable the learners to make sense of the other easily. The buy-one-get-(almost)-one-free effect serves to encourage learners of Chinese to pursue bi-script literacy, a realistic and pragmatic goal.","PeriodicalId":36639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Writing Systems","volume":"71 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140473719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A new explanation of “toubo (投博)” in the bronze mirror inscriptions of Han Dynasty","authors":"Dechao Kong","doi":"10.1177/25138502231217524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25138502231217524","url":null,"abstract":"The phrase “toubo (投博)” in “toubozhiming (投博至明)” was the abbreviation of “touhu 投壶” and “boxi 博戏” in the bronze mirror inscriptions. In the Han Dynasty, “touhu (投壶)” and “boxi (博戏),” as two kinds of entertainment activities, usually appeared in the banquet scene simultaneously. As two dynamic and static activities, they were both physical and intellectual competitions, which were able to satisfy people's spiritual and cultural requirements. “Toubo (投博)” was understood as the abbreviation of “touhu (投壶)” and “boxi (博戏)”; it not only showed the rich variety of entertainment activities in the Han Dynasty, but also truly restored the scene of “toubozhiming (投博至明)” in the bronze mirror inscriptions.","PeriodicalId":36639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Writing Systems","volume":"173 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140482055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Semantic classifiers in Guodian bamboo manuscripts: Reconstructing categories in the ancient Chinese mind","authors":"Yanru Xu","doi":"10.1177/25138502231215437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25138502231215437","url":null,"abstract":"Ancient Chinese scripts are one of the most complex writing systems in the world. Many graphs contain components referred to as unpronounced semantic classifiers. These components bear a semantic relationship to the meaning of the word written by the graph. It is proposed that the set of semantic components, as well as the specific semantic concepts that they encode, reflect a cognitive map of knowledge organization of the community of script users at a particular place and time. By analyzing the semantic classifiers within a constrained manuscript corpus, it is possible to build a network that models aspects of the ancient Chinese knowledge organization as reflected in this corpus. With the help of the digital tool iClassifier , a corpus-based study is conducted based on the sample texts, Guodian bamboo manuscripts. Additionally, a list of semantic classifiers is presented, two prominent categories 心 [heart/senses & emotion ] and 辵 [road + foot/movement] are analyzed, and a visualization network of the sample corpus is drawn.","PeriodicalId":36639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Writing Systems","volume":"113 51","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139616324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}