Scottish Feminist Judgments最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Commonwealth Oil & Gas Co Ltd v Baxter and Another [2009] CSIH 75 Commonwealth Oil & Gas Co Ltd诉Baxter and Another [2009] CSIH 75
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-014
Alice Belcher
{"title":"Commonwealth Oil & Gas Co Ltd v Baxter and Another [2009] CSIH 75","authors":"Alice Belcher","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131370137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on Rafique v Amin 评论拉菲克诉阿明案
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-11.2
B. Holligan
{"title":"Commentary on Rafique v Amin","authors":"B. Holligan","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-11.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-11.2","url":null,"abstract":"Rafique v Amin is one of the few reported cases to address the use and management of property that is owned in common. While not an obviously gendered dispute, it nevertheless involves a number of issues fundamental to feminist theory, in particular, notions of identity and autonomy and the role of property rules in mediating between individual and collective interests. In Scots law, property owned by multiple individuals is often held as common property. This is similar to the English concept of the equitable tenancy in common, in that each owner is treated as having a distinct and separable share in an undivided whole. Debate in Rafique occurs within the context of an antipathy towards the very idea of common property that is embedded within Scots legal doctrine.","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115294086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
White v White 2001 SC 689 怀特诉怀特2001 sc689
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-008
K. Norrie
{"title":"White v White 2001 SC 689","authors":"K. Norrie","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-008","url":null,"abstract":"An imagined judgment delivered in the contact case of White v White, structured according to feminist principles.","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127022480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on Ruxton v Lang 鲁克斯顿诉朗案评析
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-5.2
L. Campbell
{"title":"Commentary on Ruxton v Lang","authors":"L. Campbell","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-5.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-5.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126341793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Devolving Dictum? Legal Tradition, National Identity and Feminist Activism 将格言?法律传统、民族认同与女权主义行动
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 2019-10-31 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-002
S. Cowan, C. Kennedy, V. Munro
{"title":"Devolving Dictum? Legal Tradition, National Identity and Feminist Activism","authors":"S. Cowan, C. Kennedy, V. Munro","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128130196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Through the Looking Glass? Feminist Praxis, Artistic Methods and Scottish Feminist Judging 《镜中奇遇记》女性主义实践、艺术方法与苏格兰女性主义评判
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 2019-10-31 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-001
S. Cowan, C. Kennedy, V. Munro
{"title":"Through the Looking Glass? Feminist Praxis, Artistic Methods and Scottish Feminist Judging","authors":"S. Cowan, C. Kennedy, V. Munro","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123043271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68 大格拉斯哥卫生委员会诉Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 2015-01-20 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015
Jeffrey Wale
{"title":"Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68","authors":"Jeffrey Wale","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015","url":null,"abstract":"This commentary considers the Supreme Court’s recent judgement in Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan & Another (Respondents) and the challenging issue of conscientious objection in the context of abortion.","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126068333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on Salvesen v Riddell 萨尔文森诉里德尔案评注
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-18.2
Shazia Choudhry
{"title":"Commentary on Salvesen v Riddell","authors":"Shazia Choudhry","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-18.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-18.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125292302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflective Statement: Helen Johnson 反思陈述:海伦·约翰逊
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-16.3
Nicola Loughran
{"title":"Reflective Statement: Helen Johnson","authors":"Nicola Loughran","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-16.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-16.3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121474282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflective Statement: Smith v Lees 反思性陈述:史密斯诉李案
Scottish Feminist Judgments Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509923298.ch-3.3
Ilona Cairns
{"title":"Reflective Statement: Smith v Lees","authors":"Ilona Cairns","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-3.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-3.3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126432809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信