{"title":"大格拉斯哥卫生委员会诉Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68","authors":"Jeffrey Wale","doi":"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary considers the Supreme Court’s recent judgement in Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan & Another (Respondents) and the challenging issue of conscientious objection in the context of abortion.","PeriodicalId":365931,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Wale\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This commentary considers the Supreme Court’s recent judgement in Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan & Another (Respondents) and the challenging issue of conscientious objection in the context of abortion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scottish Feminist Judgments\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scottish Feminist Judgments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Feminist Judgments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923298.ch-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68
This commentary considers the Supreme Court’s recent judgement in Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan & Another (Respondents) and the challenging issue of conscientious objection in the context of abortion.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
