Santander Art and Culture Law Review最新文献_第4页

Alicja Jagielska-Burduk talks with Carla Shapreau, a Senior Fellow in the Institute of European Studies, University of California, Berkeley alicia Jagielska-Burduk采访加州大学伯克利分校欧洲研究所高级研究员Carla Shapreau

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.002.18114

Alicja Jagielska-Burduk

引用次数: 0

„Kurdystan. Oblicza trwania” – I edycja Międzynarodowego Festiwalu Sztuki Protonarodów w Bydgoszczy "库尔德斯坦。持续的面孔"--第一届比得哥什国际 Protonarod 艺术节

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.017.18129

Wacław Kuczma

引用次数: 0

Konwencja UNESCO o ochronie podwodnego dziedzictwa kulturowego z 2001 roku a prawo polskie. Postulaty de lege ferenda w zakresie regulacji wydobywania zabytków z morza 2001 年教科文组织《保护水下文化遗产公约》和波兰法律。从海洋中提取文物的拟议法规定

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.005.18117

Wojciech Kowalski

引用次数: 0

Zagrożenie dziedzictwa kulturowego przestępczością – analiza wydarzeń w 2021 roku 犯罪对文化遗产的威胁--对 2021 年发生的事件的分析

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.23.015.18127

Olgierd Jakubowski

引用次数: 0

Repatriation from Scottish Museums: A Short Report 从苏格兰博物馆遣返：一个简短的报告

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.027.17040

N. Curtis, Steph C. Scholten

引用次数: 0

Protection and Repatriation of Cultural Heritage – Country Report: Indonesia 文化遗产的保护和归还——国家报告：印度尼西亚

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.025.17038

Emiline Smith, Rucitarahma Ristiawan, T. Sudarmadi

{"title":"Protection and Repatriation of Cultural Heritage – Country Report: Indonesia","authors":"Emiline Smith, Rucitarahma Ristiawan, T. Sudarmadi","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.025.17038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.025.17038","url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a broad overview of Indonesia’s current post-independence legislation and practice with respect to cultural heritage protection and repatriation. We highlight several challenges that hamper the effective implementation and enforcement of this framework, particularly in relation to repatriation processes of foreign-held cultural objects. We furthermore explore how the State-centric discourse that surrounds Indonesia’s cultural heritage protection and repatriation policies impede locally-led activism related to cultural heritage, particularly in relation to value production and sense of ownership. Overall, we highlight the importance of co-creation in knowledge production processes and crime-prevention methods concerning cultural heritage to maximize effectiveness. Agency, access, and ownership were violently removed through the colonial looting of Indonesian cultural heritage, so the first step towards restorative justice should be reinstating this to the communities of origin, or to the Indonesian government when the rightful origin community cannot be identified. This concerns not only the cultural objects themselves, but also their digital and physical lives, i.e. the knowledge and expertise created based on these objects.","PeriodicalId":36554,"journal":{"name":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41453985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Colonial-Looted Cultural Objects in England 英国的殖民掠夺文物

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.031.17044

L. Bursey

引用次数: 0

Law, Provenance Research, and Restitution of Colonial Cultural Property: Reflections on (In)Equality and a Sri Lankan Object in the Netherlands 殖民文化财产的法律、来源研究与归还:关于荷兰的平等与斯里兰卡文物的思考

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.028.17041

Naazima Kamardeen, Jos van Beurden

{"title":"Law, Provenance Research, and Restitution of Colonial Cultural Property: Reflections on (In)Equality and a Sri Lankan Object in the Netherlands","authors":"Naazima Kamardeen, Jos van Beurden","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.028.17041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.028.17041","url":null,"abstract":"The status of colonial objects in European museums touches upon a matrix of legal and historical issues. This article engages with some of them, while referring to the case of a Sri Lankan object in the possession of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam (RMA) in the Netherlands: a ceremonial cannon looted by the Dutch from the King of Kandy in 1765. The article offers a historical overview of the European colonial domination of Ceylon, distinguishing between the Portuguese, Dutch, and British periods, and for each period distinguishes the nature and the size of the confiscated heritage. It also analyses Sri Lanka’s legal title to the cannon, and the discrepancy between the international and mostly Euro-centric legal regime and Sri Lanka’s own legal framework. The article moves on to analyses of and reflections about the type of provenance research practiced by the RMA, as well as the broader efforts in the Netherlands for better provenance research. The importance of the cannon for both Sri Lanka and the Netherlands, as well as earlier efforts to retrieve it, are also described and evaluated. In its conclusions, the article proffers suggestions for more balance and equality in the provenance research efforts. The contribution covers legal studies, history, and museum studies and is based on the literature, historical catalogues, and other documents, as well as the practice of UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to its Countries titution in case of Illicit Appropriation (ICPRCP).","PeriodicalId":36554,"journal":{"name":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42027645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Protection, Ownership, and Return of Cultural Property: A Surinamese Law Perspective 文化财产的保护、所有权和返还：苏里南法律视角

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.029.17042

Nadia Rostam

{"title":"The Protection, Ownership, and Return of Cultural Property: A Surinamese Law Perspective","authors":"Nadia Rostam","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.029.17042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.029.17042","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the ownership of cultural objects within national and traditional customary law in Suriname, with the aim to provide a legal context to the issue of claims for the return of some of these cultural objects from the Netherlands. The discussion of the legal regime for exporting cultural objects examines the National Ordinance of 1952 on Provisions for the Preservation of Objects with Historical, Cultural, and Scientific Value; the Movement of Goods Act of 2003; and the Monuments Act of 2002, which protects immovable objects, objects of archaeological excavations, and discoveries. This is followed by a short overview of the legal regime relating to the ownership of cultural property under the Surinamese Civil Code. Next this article outlines the property law of cultural objects under customary laws of Indigenous and Tribal communities in Suriname and how these may be included in the Draft Civil Code and the Draft Legislation on Rules Concerning the Collective Land Rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples. The article concludes that neither the existing legal framework nor the draft legislation provide answers on dealing with cultural objects acquired in a colonial context and the possible repatriation of such objects.","PeriodicalId":36554,"journal":{"name":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47980200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Colonial Loot and Its Restitution – the Role of Human Rights. Alexandra Xanthaki talks to Evelien Campfens, Surabhi Ranganathan, Andrzej Jakubowski, and Alicja Jagielska-Burduk 殖民掠夺及其归还——人权的作用。Alexandra Xanthaki采访了Evelien Campfens, Surabhi Ranganathan, Andrzej Jakubowski和Alicja Jagielska-Burduk

Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI: 10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.010.17023

A. Xanthaki

引用次数: 0