Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings最新文献

Chapter 2: How Upper Levels Strive to Influence Law-Making at the Lower Levels and Why Lower Levels Can’t Have Cake and Eat It 第二章:上级如何努力影响下级立法，为什么下级不能鱼与熊掌兼得

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 2019-10-17 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-43

E. Schmid

引用次数: 0

Chapter 9: The Phenomenon of ʻDirective-like Recommendationsʼ and their Implementation: Lessons from Hungarian Legislative Practice 第九章:“指令性建议”现象及其实施:匈牙利立法实践的启示

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-199

P. Láncos

引用次数: 0

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Titelei /目录。

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-1

引用次数: 0

Chapter 4: Multi-level lawmaking and Better Regulation in the European Union: a critical approach 第四章:欧盟的多层次立法和更好的监管:一个关键途径

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-91

Maria Mousmouti

引用次数: 0

Chapter 7: Hybrid and neutral language(s) in EU Multi-Level Legislative Drafting 第七章:欧盟多层次立法起草中的混合语言和中性语言

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-151

Agnieszka Doczekalska

引用次数: 0

Chapter 6: A critical analysis of EU regulation 第六章:欧盟监管的批判性分析

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-123

Markéta Whelanová

引用次数: 0

Chapter 11: Transposition of EU Legislation into domestic law: Challenges faced by National Parliaments 第11章:欧盟立法转化为国内法:各国议会面临的挑战

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-241

W. Voermans

引用次数: 0

Chapter 13: Regulating Private Law. The Rise of Regulations and their Impact on National Codifications 第十三章:调整私法。法规的兴起及其对国家法典编纂的影响

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-273

R. D. Graaff, D. Verheij

{"title":"Chapter 13: Regulating Private Law. The Rise of Regulations and their Impact on National Codifications","authors":"R. D. Graaff, D. Verheij","doi":"10.5771/9783748900863-273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748900863-273","url":null,"abstract":"The spirit of codification is still strong on the continent. Over the past decades, many countries have reformed their civil codes. The Netherlands (1992), Germany (2002), Romania (2011), the Czech Republic (2014), and Hungary (2014) are just a few examples. Important new reforms are currently making their way through the legislative process. The French government wishes to complement the recently introduced law of contract with a new law of delict. The Belgian government even intends to introduce a fresh codification embracing the whole of private law. These efforts are made against the background of an expanding body of secondary EU law. Since the 1980s, a range of directives has been introduced in order to improve the functioning of the internal market. Many of these directives regulate private law matters, such as misleading advertising, unfair commercial practices, the liability for the infringement of competition law and the return of cultural property. Over the past ten years, the Union legislature has developed a preference for using regulations rather than directives. This development can be seen in the areas of transport, consumer protection, judicial cooperation in civil matters and the internal market more broadly. As a result, important areas of private law are now governed by regulations, not by directives. The legislative shift from directives to regulations raises important questions that have, so far, received little attention, at least not from the perspective of private law. What does the preference for regulations entail for the future of the national civil codes? What impact does this development have on the clarity, accessibility and consistency of the current systems of private law, both at the European level and within the national legal orders? How can national legislatures and courts deal with this development? How can academics pay attention to these regulations in their education Chapter 13:","PeriodicalId":364940,"journal":{"name":"Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127244574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Chapter 12: How to reconcile the drafting rules and practices of the Member-States with the rules and practices of the EU? 第12章:如何协调成员国的起草规则和做法与欧盟的规则和做法?

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-261

R. Lanceiro

引用次数: 0

Chapter 10: Multilevel consultation procedures at the EU level and their contribution in copyright law making 第十章:欧盟层面的多层次磋商程序及其对版权法制定的贡献

Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748900863-219

N. Koutras

引用次数: 0