Chapter 13: Regulating Private Law. The Rise of Regulations and their Impact on National Codifications

R. D. Graaff, D. Verheij
{"title":"Chapter 13: Regulating Private Law. The Rise of Regulations and their Impact on National Codifications","authors":"R. D. Graaff, D. Verheij","doi":"10.5771/9783748900863-273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spirit of codification is still strong on the continent. Over the past decades, many countries have reformed their civil codes. The Netherlands (1992), Germany (2002), Romania (2011), the Czech Republic (2014), and Hungary (2014) are just a few examples. Important new reforms are currently making their way through the legislative process. The French government wishes to complement the recently introduced law of contract with a new law of delict. The Belgian government even intends to introduce a fresh codification embracing the whole of private law. These efforts are made against the background of an expanding body of secondary EU law. Since the 1980s, a range of directives has been introduced in order to improve the functioning of the internal market. Many of these directives regulate private law matters, such as misleading advertising, unfair commercial practices, the liability for the infringement of competition law and the return of cultural property. Over the past ten years, the Union legislature has developed a preference for using regulations rather than directives. This development can be seen in the areas of transport, consumer protection, judicial cooperation in civil matters and the internal market more broadly. As a result, important areas of private law are now governed by regulations, not by directives. The legislative shift from directives to regulations raises important questions that have, so far, received little attention, at least not from the perspective of private law. What does the preference for regulations entail for the future of the national civil codes? What impact does this development have on the clarity, accessibility and consistency of the current systems of private law, both at the European level and within the national legal orders? How can national legislatures and courts deal with this development? How can academics pay attention to these regulations in their education Chapter 13:","PeriodicalId":364940,"journal":{"name":"Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lawmaking in Multi-level Settings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748900863-273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The spirit of codification is still strong on the continent. Over the past decades, many countries have reformed their civil codes. The Netherlands (1992), Germany (2002), Romania (2011), the Czech Republic (2014), and Hungary (2014) are just a few examples. Important new reforms are currently making their way through the legislative process. The French government wishes to complement the recently introduced law of contract with a new law of delict. The Belgian government even intends to introduce a fresh codification embracing the whole of private law. These efforts are made against the background of an expanding body of secondary EU law. Since the 1980s, a range of directives has been introduced in order to improve the functioning of the internal market. Many of these directives regulate private law matters, such as misleading advertising, unfair commercial practices, the liability for the infringement of competition law and the return of cultural property. Over the past ten years, the Union legislature has developed a preference for using regulations rather than directives. This development can be seen in the areas of transport, consumer protection, judicial cooperation in civil matters and the internal market more broadly. As a result, important areas of private law are now governed by regulations, not by directives. The legislative shift from directives to regulations raises important questions that have, so far, received little attention, at least not from the perspective of private law. What does the preference for regulations entail for the future of the national civil codes? What impact does this development have on the clarity, accessibility and consistency of the current systems of private law, both at the European level and within the national legal orders? How can national legislatures and courts deal with this development? How can academics pay attention to these regulations in their education Chapter 13:
第十三章:调整私法。法规的兴起及其对国家法典编纂的影响
编纂的精神在非洲大陆仍然很强烈。在过去的几十年里,许多国家都对其民法典进行了改革。荷兰(1992年)、德国(2002年)、罗马尼亚(2011年)、捷克共和国(2014年)和匈牙利(2014年)只是其中的几个例子。重要的新改革目前正在通过立法程序。法国政府希望用一项新的侵权法来补充最近实行的合同法。比利时政府甚至打算引入一套包含整个私法的新法典。这些努力是在欧盟二级法律不断扩大的背景下进行的。自1980年代以来,已经出台了一系列指令,以改善内部市场的运作。这些指令中有许多规定私法事项,例如误导人的广告、不公平的商业做法、违反竞争法的责任和归还文化财产。在过去的十年里,欧盟立法机构倾向于使用法规而不是指令。这种发展可以在运输、保护消费者、民事司法合作和更广泛的内部市场等领域看到。因此,私法的重要领域现在是由法规而不是指令来管理的。从指令到法规的立法转变引发了一些重要的问题,但迄今为止,这些问题几乎没有得到关注,至少从私法的角度来看没有。对法规的偏好对国家民法典的未来意味着什么?这种发展对欧洲一级和各国法律秩序内现行私法制度的明确性、可及性和一致性有什么影响?国家立法机构和法院如何处理这一事态发展?学者如何在教育中注意这些规定?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信