{"title":"Mobile App for Improving the Mental Health of Youth in Out-of-Home Care: Development Study Using an Intervention Mapping Approach.","authors":"Jinyoung Park, Jungeun Lee, Dabok Noh","doi":"10.2196/64681","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64681","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth in out-of-home care encounter substantial mental health challenges because of the absence of stable family and social support systems. Their vulnerability is heightened by trauma, neglect, and abuse. They struggle, especially when transitioning to independent living, coping with loneliness, anxiety, and pressure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a mobile app with high accessibility and long-term continuous effects to support independent living and improve mental health among youth in out-of-home care. The approach used was the systematic and step-by-step intervention mapping (IM) framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The program was created using the IM framework and had 6 steps. Drawing from data from individual and focus group interviews and literature reviews, we developed a logical model of the problem. We established program outcomes and objectives, defining performance objectives and variable determinants. We identified theoretical and evidence-based methods that influence determinants. The app design integrated these methods into practical applications, allowing for the creation of self-management and emotional support tools. The development process included ongoing discussions between app designers and the research team to ensure that user needs and preferences were addressed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual interviews and focus group discussions revealed challenges in managing daily routines and regulating emotions. The program design was based on the transtheoretical model, social cognitive theory, and elaboration likelihood model. Key features included goal setting, structured routines, emotion recognition flashcards, character models demonstrating emotion regulation strategies, verbal persuasion, and self-monitoring tools to support habit formation and emotion regulation. An implementation plan was developed to facilitate the app's adoption, execution, and maintenance, while an evaluation plan was established, including app usage analytics, user logs, and feedback surveys. A randomized controlled trial will be conducted to assess the app's impact on mental health outcomes, focusing on reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms, improving emotion regulation, and enhancing daily living skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IM framework was beneficial in developing a mobile app to enhance the mental health of youth in out-of-home care. The study produced a program grounded in theory and evidence that caters to the needs of these individuals. Further research should aim to verify the app's effectiveness in real-world settings and refine it continuously based on user input.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e64681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142688993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jojanneke Drogt, Megan Milota, Wouter Veldhuis, Shoko Vos, Karin Jongsma
{"title":"The Promise of AI for Image-Driven Medicine: Qualitative Interview Study of Radiologists' and Pathologists' Perspectives.","authors":"Jojanneke Drogt, Megan Milota, Wouter Veldhuis, Shoko Vos, Karin Jongsma","doi":"10.2196/52514","DOIUrl":"10.2196/52514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Image-driven specialisms such as radiology and pathology are at the forefront of medical artificial intelligence (AI) innovation. Many believe that AI will lead to significant shifts in professional roles, so it is vital to investigate how professionals view the pending changes that AI innovation will initiate and incorporate their views in ongoing AI developments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study aimed to gain insights into the perspectives and wishes of radiologists and pathologists regarding the promise of AI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have conducted the first qualitative interview study investigating the perspectives of both radiologists and pathologists regarding the integration of AI in their fields. The study design is in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 21 participants were interviewed for this study (7 pathologists, 10 radiologists, and 4 computer scientists). The interviews revealed a diverse range of perspectives on the impact of AI. Respondents discussed various task-specific benefits of AI; yet, both pathologists and radiologists agreed that AI had yet to live up to its hype. Overall, our study shows that AI could facilitate welcome changes in the workflows of image-driven professionals and eventually lead to better quality of care. At the same time, these professionals also admitted that many hopes and expectations for AI were unlikely to become a reality in the next decade.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study points to the importance of maintaining a \"healthy skepticism\" on the promise of AI in imaging specialisms and argues for more structural and inclusive discussions about whether AI is the right technology to solve current problems encountered in daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e52514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jannik Zimmermann, Harriet Morf, Florian Scharf, Johannes Knitza, Heidi Moeller, Felix Muehlensiepen, Michaela Nathrath, Till Orlemann, Thomas Voelker, Merlin Deckers
{"title":"German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study.","authors":"Jannik Zimmermann, Harriet Morf, Florian Scharf, Johannes Knitza, Heidi Moeller, Felix Muehlensiepen, Michaela Nathrath, Till Orlemann, Thomas Voelker, Merlin Deckers","doi":"10.2196/57771","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57771","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The exponential growth of telehealth is revolutionizing health care delivery, but its evaluation has not matched the pace of its uptake. Various forms of assessment, from single-item to more extensive questionnaires, have been used to assess telehealth and digital therapeutics and their usability. The most frequently used questionnaire is the \"Telehealth Usability Questionnaire\" (TUQ). The use of the TUQ is limited by its restricted availability in languages other than English and its feasibility.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to create a translated German TUQ version and to derive a short questionnaire for patients-\"Telehealth Usability and Perceived Usefulness Short Questionnaire for patients\" (TUUSQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a first step, the original 21-item TUQ was forward and back-translated twice. In the second step, 13 TUQ items were selected for their suitability for the general evaluation of telehealth on the basis of expert opinion. These 13 items were surveyed between July 2022 and September 2023 in 4 studies with patients and family members of palliative care, as well as patients with chronic autoimmune diseases, evaluating 13 health care apps, including digital therapeutics and a telehealth system (n1=128, n2=220, n3=30, and n4=12). Psychometric exploratory factor analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that a parsimonious factor structure with 2 factors (\"perceived usefulness in health care\" and \"usability\") is sufficient to describe the patient's perception. Consequently, the questionnaire could be shortened to 6 items without compromising its informativeness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide a linguistically precise German version of the TUQ for assessing the usability and perceived usefulness of telehealth. Beyond that, we supply a highly feasible shortened version that is versatile for general use in telehealth, mobile health, and digital therapeutics, which distinguishes between the 2 factors \"perceived usefulness in health care\" and \"usability\" in patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030546; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030546.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e57771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Simone Schmidt, Adam Boulton, Benita Butler, Timothy Fazio
{"title":"Exploring Patient, Proxy, and Clinician Perspectives on the Value and Impact of an Inpatient Portal: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.","authors":"Simone Schmidt, Adam Boulton, Benita Butler, Timothy Fazio","doi":"10.2196/52703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/52703","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research exploring perspectives on inpatient portals reports that patients desire the information affordances of inpatient portals, and clinicians recognize their value for improving patient experience but also express caution regarding sharing aspects of the medical record. This study contributed to the existing literature on inpatient portals by considering the psychosocial dimension of clinician resistance to information sharing with inpatients and the power dynamic associated with clinician-patient information asymmetry. Along with the information affordances commonly discussed in this area, this study explored perspectives on the novel option to audio record consultations via an inpatient portal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to understand patient, proxy, and clinician perspectives on the value and impact of an inpatient portal within the Australian context. It explores clinician resistance and receptivity to sharing aspects of the medical record with patients and the power dynamic that characterizes the relationship between clinician and patient. It considers how an inpatient portal might assist in the transformation of this relationship such that this relationship could be characterized by greater information symmetry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews were conducted with patients (n=20), proxies (n=4), and clinicians (n=21) recruited from 3 areas within the Royal Melbourne Hospital, where the portal would later be implemented. A largely inductive reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient and proxy participants reported that they wanted to understand what is happening in their care for peace of mind and that an inpatient portal could support this understanding. Clinician participants reflected on how they might transform their information-sharing practice to provide greater transparency in their relationship with patients. Participants considered the types of information that could be shared and how this information could be shared via an inpatient portal. Four key themes were generated: (1) affording the patient and proxy awareness, control, and reassurance through sharing accessible and meaningful information; (2) protecting the clinician and safeguarding quality health care in information sharing; (3) flexibly deploying the functions depending upon clinician, patient, proxy, and context; and (4) moving toward person-centered care: empowerment and equity via an inpatient portal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An inpatient portal provides an opportunity to reconceptualize the medical record and how this information might be shared with patients while they are admitted to the hospital, such that they have more understanding as to what is happening in their care, which ultimately supports their well-being. The transition to a more transparent information-sharing culture in the Australian hospital context will take time. An inpatient po","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e52703"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christine Preiser, Natalia Radionova, Eylem Ög, Roland Koch, Malte Klemmt, Regina Müller, Robert Ranisch, Stefanie Joos, Monika A Rieger
{"title":"The Doctors, Their Patients, and the Symptom Checker App: Qualitative Interview Study With General Practitioners in Germany.","authors":"Christine Preiser, Natalia Radionova, Eylem Ög, Roland Koch, Malte Klemmt, Regina Müller, Robert Ranisch, Stefanie Joos, Monika A Rieger","doi":"10.2196/57360","DOIUrl":"10.2196/57360","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptom checkers are designed for laypeople and promise to provide a preliminary diagnosis, a sense of urgency, and a suggested course of action.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We used the international symptom checker app (SCA) Ada App as an example to answer the following question: How do general practitioners (GPs) experience the SCA in relation to the macro, meso, and micro level of their daily work, and how does this interact with work-related psychosocial resources and demands?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 8 semistructured interviews with GPs in Germany between December 2020 and February 2022. We analyzed the data using the integrative basic method, an interpretative-reconstructive method, to identify core themes and modes of thematization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although most GPs in this study were open to digitization in health care and their practice, only one was familiar with the SCA. GPs considered the SCA as part of the \"unorganized stage\" of patients' searching about their conditions. Some preferred it to popular search engines. They considered it relevant to their work as soon as the SCA would influence patients' decisions to see a doctor. Some wanted to see the results of the SCA in advance in order to decide on the patient's next steps. GPs described the diagnostic process as guided by shared decision-making, with the GP taking the lead and the patient deciding. They saw diagnosis as an act of making sense of data, which the SCA would not be able to do, despite the huge amounts of data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPs took a techno-pragmatic view of SCA. They operate in a health care system of increasing scarcity. They saw the SCA as a potential work-related resource if it helped them to reduce administrative tasks and unnecessary patient contacts. The SCA was seen as a potential work-related demand if it increased workload, for example, if it increased patients' anxiety, was too risk-averse, or made patients more insistent on their own opinions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e57360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142669291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Veronika Kubickova, Craig Steel, Michelle L Moulds, Marie Kanstrup, Sally Beer, Melanie Darwent, Liza Keating, Emily A Holmes, Lalitha Iyadurai
{"title":"Reducing the Number of Intrusive Memories of Work-Related Traumatic Events in Frontline Health Care Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Series.","authors":"Veronika Kubickova, Craig Steel, Michelle L Moulds, Marie Kanstrup, Sally Beer, Melanie Darwent, Liza Keating, Emily A Holmes, Lalitha Iyadurai","doi":"10.2196/55562","DOIUrl":"10.2196/55562","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frontline health care staff are frequently exposed to traumatic events as part of their work. Although this study commenced before the emergence of COVID-19, levels of exposure were heightened by the pandemic. Many health care staff members report intrusive memories of such events, which can elicit distress, affect functioning, and be associated with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in the long term. We need evidence-based interventions that are brief, preventative, nonstigmatizing, suitable for the working lives of frontline health care staff, and effective for repeated trauma exposure. A brief, guided imagery-competing task intervention involving a trauma reminder cue and Tetris gameplay may hold promise in this regard, given evidence that it can prevent and reduce the number of intrusive memories following trauma across various settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This case series aims to investigate the impact of a brief imagery-competing task intervention on the number of intrusive memories, general functioning, and symptoms of posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depression, and examine the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention for UK National Health Service frontline health care staff. The intervention was delivered with guidance from a clinical psychologist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 12 clinical staff from the UK National Health Service, specifically from emergency departments, the intensive care unit, and the ambulance service. We evaluated the intervention using an AB single-case experimental design, where the baseline (A) was the monitoring-only phase and the postintervention (B) period was the time after the intervention was first administered. Methods were adapted once the COVID-19 pandemic began.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a decrease (59%) in the mean number of intrusive memories per day from baseline (mean 1.29, SD 0.94) to postintervention (mean 0.54, SD 0.51). There was a statistically significant reduction in the number of intrusive memories from baseline to postintervention, as shown by an aggregated omnibus analysis with a small effect size (τ-U=-0.38; P<.001). Depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress symptoms all significantly reduced from preintervention to postintervention. Participants also reported improvements in functioning based on both quantitative and qualitative measures. The intervention was feasible to deliver and rated as acceptable by participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These preliminary findings suggest that this brief therapist-guided imagery-competing task intervention offers a potential approach to mitigating the impact of work-related traumatic events in frontline health care staff, both during a pandemic and beyond. Randomized controlled trials will be an important next step.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e55562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142669286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mobile App for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases During Home-Based Exercise Care: Usability Study.","authors":"Shih-Ying Chien","doi":"10.2196/60049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health tools have demonstrated promise in the treatment and self-management of chronic diseases while also serving as an important means for reducing the workload of health care professionals (HCPs) and enhancing the quality of care. However, these tools often merely undergo large-scale testing or enter the market without undergoing rigorous user experience analysis in the early stages of their development, leading to frequent instances of low use or failure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the usability of and satisfaction with a mobile app designed for the clinical monitoring of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation at home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a mixed methods approach involving two key stakeholders-patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and HCPs-across three phases: (1) mobile app mock-up design, (2) usability testing, and (3) satisfaction evaluation. Using convenience sampling, participants were grouped as HCPs (n=12) and patients (n=18). Each received a tablet with mock-ups for usability testing through interviews, with audio recordings transcribed and analyzed anonymously in NVivo12.0, focusing on mock-up features and usability insights. Task difficulty was rated from 1 (very easy) to 5 (very difficult), with noncompletion deemed a critical error. Usability satisfaction was measured on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research indicated a notable difference in app usability perceptions: 66% (8/12) of HCPs found tasks \"very easy,\" compared to only 22% (4/18) of patients. Despite this, no participant made critical errors or withdrew, and satisfaction was high. HCPs completed tasks in about 20 minutes, while patients took 30. Older adults faced challenges with touch screens and scroll menus, suggesting the need for intuitive design aids like auditory support and visual health progress indicators, such as graphs. HCPs noted potential data delays affecting service, while non-native-speaking caregivers faced interpretation challenges. A secure pairing system for privacy in teleconsultations proved difficult for older users; a simpler icon-based system is recommended. This study highlights the need to consider stakeholder abilities in medical app design to enhance function implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most HCPs (11/12, 91%) found the app intuitive, though they recommended adding icons to show patient progress to support clinical decisions. In contrast, 62% (11/18) of patients struggled with tablet navigation, especially with connectivity features. To ensure equitable access, the design should accommodate older users with diverse abilities. Despite challenges, both groups reported high satisfaction, with patients expressing a willingness to learn and recommending the app. These positive usabilit","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e60049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142640002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maryam Almashmoum, James Cunningham, John Ainsworth
{"title":"Evaluating Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Among Health Care Professionals in the Medical Imaging Departments of 2 Cancer Centers: Concurrent Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Maryam Almashmoum, James Cunningham, John Ainsworth","doi":"10.2196/53780","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53780","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge sharing is a crucial part of any knowledge management implementation. It refers to sharing skills and experience among team members in an organization. In a health care setting, sharing knowledge, whether tacit or explicit, is important and can lead to better health care services. In medical imaging departments, knowledge sharing can be of particular importance. There are several factors that affect knowledge-sharing practices in medical imaging departments: individual, departmental, and technological. Evaluating the importance of these factors and understanding their use can help with improving knowledge-sharing practices in medical imaging departments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the level of motivation, identify current knowledge-sharing tools, and evaluate factors affecting knowledge sharing in the medical imaging departments of 2 cancer centers, The Christie, United Kingdom, and the Kuwait Cancer Control Center (KCCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A concurrent mixed methods study was conducted through nonprobability sampling techniques between February 1, 2023, and July 30, 2023. Semistructured interviews were used to validate the results of the quantitative analysis. Data were collected using an electronic questionnaire that was distributed among health care professionals in both cancer centers using Qualtrics. Semistructured interviews were conducted online using Microsoft Teams. The quantitative data were analyzed using the Qualtrics MX software to report the results for each question, whereas the qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic approach with codes classified through NVivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 56 respondents from the KCCC and 29 from The Christie participated, with a 100% response rate (56/56, 100% and 29/29, 100%, respectively) based on the Qualtrics survey tool. A total of 59% (17/29) of health care professionals from The Christie shared their knowledge using emails and face-to-face communication as their main tools on a daily basis, and 57% (32/56) of health care professionals from the KCCC used face-to-face communication for knowledge sharing. The mean Likert-scale score of all the components that assessed the factors that affected knowledge-sharing behaviors fell between \"somewhat agree\" and \"strongly agree\" in both centers, excepting extrinsic motivation, which was rated as \"neither agree nor disagree.\" This was similar to the results related to incentives. It was shown that 52% (15/29) of health care professionals at The Christie had no incentives to encourage knowledge-sharing practices. Therefore, establishing clear policies to manage incentives is important to increase knowledge-sharing practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offered an evaluation of factors that affect knowledge sharing in 2 cancer centers. Most health care professionals were aware of the importance of knowledge-sharing practices in enha","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e53780"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caroline McBride, Barbara Hunter, Natalie Lumsden, Kaleswari Somasundaram, Rita McMorrow, Douglas Boyle, Jon Emery, Craig Nelson, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis
{"title":"Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Caroline McBride, Barbara Hunter, Natalie Lumsden, Kaleswari Somasundaram, Rita McMorrow, Douglas Boyle, Jon Emery, Craig Nelson, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis","doi":"10.2196/55667","DOIUrl":"10.2196/55667","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Future Health Today (FHT) is a technology program that integrates with general practice clinical software to provide point of care (PoC) clinical decision support and a quality improvement dashboard. This qualitative study looks at the use of FHT in the context of cardiovascular disease risk in chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore factors influencing clinical implementation of the FHT module focusing on cardiovascular risk in CKD, from the perspectives of participating general practitioner staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Practices in Victoria were recruited to participate in a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial using FHT, of which 19 practices were randomly assigned to use FHT's cardiovascular risk in CKD program. A total of 13 semistructured interviews were undertaken with a nominated general practitioner (n=7) or practice nurse (n=6) from 10 participating practices. Interview questions focused on the clinical usefulness of the tool and its place in clinical workflows. Qualitative data were coded by 2 researchers and analyzed using framework analysis and Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 13 interviewees had used the FHT PoC tool, and feedback was largely positive. Overall, clinicians described engaging with the tool as a \"prompt\" or \"reminder\" system. Themes reflected that the tool's goals and clinical content were aligned with clinician's existing priorities and knowledge, and the tool's design facilitated easy integration into existing workflows. The main barrier to implementation identified by 2 clinicians was notification fatigue. A total of 7 interviewees had used the FHT dashboard tool. The main barriers to use were its limited integration into clinical workflows, such that some participants did not know of its existence; clinicians' competing clinical priorities; and limited time to learn and use the tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified many facilitators for the successful use of the FHT PoC program, in the context of cardiovascular risk in CKD, and barriers to the use of the dashboard program. This work will be used to inform the wider implementation of FHT, as well as the development of future modules of FHT for other risk or disease states.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e55667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577681/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kohle Merry, Megan M MacPherson, Jackie L Whittaker, Christopher Napier, Liisa Holsti, Alex Scott
{"title":"An Exercise-Based Precision Medicine Tool and Smartphone App for Managing Achilles Tendinopathy (the 'PhysViz' System): User-Centered Development Study.","authors":"Kohle Merry, Megan M MacPherson, Jackie L Whittaker, Christopher Napier, Liisa Holsti, Alex Scott","doi":"10.2196/57873","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57873","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with Achilles tendinopathy (AT) experience persistent pain that can limit engagement with daily occupations and negatively impact mental health. Current therapeutic exercise approaches vary in success, with many people experiencing reinjury, leading to a cycle of chronic tendinopathy often lasting years. High-magnitude precision loading may help people exit this feedback cycle, but applying these principles clinically is challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This user-centered design case study aims to provide an overview on how the PhysViz (a prototype for a novel remote rehabilitation intervention for AT management) was developed and evaluated following the development phase of the Framework for Accelerated and Systematic Technology-Based Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (FASTER).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development process engaged a multidisciplinary team comprising people with AT experiences, clinicians, and engineers. It followed the 5 stages within the FASTER development phase: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test. The PhysViz development and evaluation were informed by needs assessments, surveys, literature reviews, validation studies, case studies, roundtable discussions, and usability testing (some of which have been published previously). The FASTER systematically guided the integration of evidence-based features and behavior change theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By using the FASTER and ensuring that the PhysViz system was underpinned by diverse stakeholder needs, this work resulted in the development of a working prototype for both the PhysViz physical exercise tool and the accompanying PhysViz software package (mobile app and web application). A variety of study designs informed user-desired features that were integrated into the PhysViz prototype, including real-time biofeedback in the form of precision load monitoring, customizable exercise programs, and pain tracking. In addition, clinicians can visualize client data longitudinally and make changes to client exercise prescriptions remotely based on objective data. The identified areas for improvement, such as upgrading the user interface and user experience and expanding clinical applications, provide valuable insights for future PhysViz iterations. Further research is warranted to assess the long-term efficacy and feasibility of the PhysViz in diverse clinical settings and its potential to improve AT symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Being one of the first technology development initiatives guided by the FASTER, this study exemplifies a systematic and multidisciplinary approach to creating a remote rehabilitation intervention. By incorporating stakeholder feedback and evidence-based features, the PhysViz addresses key challenges in AT rehabilitation, offering a novel solution for precision loading and therapeutic exercise engagement. Positive feedback from users and clinician","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e57873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}