A Comprehensive Profiling System Integrating Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness (DISC) for Personalized Health Training: Correlational Analysis and Usability Evaluation.

IF 3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-07-18 DOI:10.2196/73397
Donghyun Kim, Dong Hun Lee, Mi Kyung Hwang
{"title":"A Comprehensive Profiling System Integrating Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness (DISC) for Personalized Health Training: Correlational Analysis and Usability Evaluation.","authors":"Donghyun Kim, Dong Hun Lee, Mi Kyung Hwang","doi":"10.2196/73397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study proposes an integrated approach to developing personalized health behavior change programs by combining personality traits and behavior types. Existing tools, such as Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness (DISC), have limitations: MBTI reflects internal tendencies but lacks behavioral insights, while DISC highlights behavior but overlooks deeper personality aspects. To address these gaps, the study integrates MBTI and DISC to create a comprehensive profiling system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this research is to design a novel profiling system that merges MBTI and DISC for personalized health management. This system aims to link personality traits with behavior patterns to enhance the effectiveness of tailored health behavior change programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 3 phases: administering MBTI and DISC tests to 130 participants to analyze correlations, developing an integrated survey for health behavior analysis, and testing its usability with 20 experts for validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlations were observed between MBTI and DISC indicators, including a notable negative correlation between Thinking-Feeling (T/F) and Dominance (D), suggesting an inverse relationship between decision-making preferences and assertiveness. Usability testing results indicated high participant satisfaction, with an average SUS (System Usability Scale) score of 86.0. The SUS is a widely used questionnaire for measuring subjective assessments of usability. This score exceeded industry benchmarks for system usability. Expert evaluations further reinforced the system's practical applicability, highlighting its potential to enhance user engagement through personalized behavioral insights.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study presents a combined MBTI and DISC profiling system, offering both theoretical insights and practical tools for health behavior change programs. Future research should validate its effectiveness with larger samples and explore broader applications in various health domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"12 ","pages":"e73397"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/73397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study proposes an integrated approach to developing personalized health behavior change programs by combining personality traits and behavior types. Existing tools, such as Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness (DISC), have limitations: MBTI reflects internal tendencies but lacks behavioral insights, while DISC highlights behavior but overlooks deeper personality aspects. To address these gaps, the study integrates MBTI and DISC to create a comprehensive profiling system.

Objective: The goal of this research is to design a novel profiling system that merges MBTI and DISC for personalized health management. This system aims to link personality traits with behavior patterns to enhance the effectiveness of tailored health behavior change programs.

Methods: The study involved 3 phases: administering MBTI and DISC tests to 130 participants to analyze correlations, developing an integrated survey for health behavior analysis, and testing its usability with 20 experts for validation.

Results: Significant correlations were observed between MBTI and DISC indicators, including a notable negative correlation between Thinking-Feeling (T/F) and Dominance (D), suggesting an inverse relationship between decision-making preferences and assertiveness. Usability testing results indicated high participant satisfaction, with an average SUS (System Usability Scale) score of 86.0. The SUS is a widely used questionnaire for measuring subjective assessments of usability. This score exceeded industry benchmarks for system usability. Expert evaluations further reinforced the system's practical applicability, highlighting its potential to enhance user engagement through personalized behavioral insights.

Conclusions: This study presents a combined MBTI and DISC profiling system, offering both theoretical insights and practical tools for health behavior change programs. Future research should validate its effectiveness with larger samples and explore broader applications in various health domains.

基于MBTI和DISC的个性化健康训练优势、影响力、稳定性和尽责性综合分析系统:相关分析和可用性评价。
背景:本研究提出了一种结合人格特质和行为类型的综合方法来制定个性化的健康行为改变计划。现有的工具,如Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)和Dominance, Influence, steady, and Conscientiousness (DISC)都有局限性:MBTI反映的是内在倾向,但缺乏行为洞察力,DISC强调的是行为,但忽视了更深层次的人格方面。为了解决这些差距,该研究将MBTI和DISC结合起来,创建了一个全面的分析系统。目的:设计一种融合MBTI和DISC的个性化健康管理分析系统。该系统旨在将人格特征与行为模式联系起来,以提高量身定制的健康行为改变计划的有效性。方法:研究分为三个阶段:对130名参与者进行MBTI和DISC测试以分析相关性,开发健康行为分析的综合调查,并与20名专家测试其可用性以进行验证。结果:MBTI与DISC指标呈显著相关,其中Thinking-Feeling (T/F)与Dominance (D)呈显著负相关,表明决策偏好与决断力呈负相关。可用性测试结果表明参与者的满意度很高,系统可用性量表的平均得分为86.0。SUS是一种广泛使用的调查问卷,用于测量可用性的主观评估。这个分数超过了系统可用性的行业基准。专家评估进一步增强了该系统的实用性,突出了其通过个性化行为洞察提高用户参与度的潜力。结论:本研究提出了一个结合MBTI和DISC的分析系统,为健康行为改变项目提供了理论见解和实用工具。未来的研究应以更大的样本验证其有效性,并探索在各个健康领域的更广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信