Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter最新文献

Der Gelehrte bei Marsilius von Padua und Wilhelm von Ockham. Zur Abgrenzung von politischer und gelehrter Autorität in der Philosophie des 14. Jahrhunderts 帕多瓦的玛利亚斯和威廉奥克汉姆的学者用来与政治和学者之间的关系世纪

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/MIAL.2012.0019

K. Ubl

{"title":"Der Gelehrte bei Marsilius von Padua und Wilhelm von Ockham. Zur Abgrenzung von politischer und gelehrter Autorität in der Philosophie des 14. Jahrhunderts","authors":"K. Ubl","doi":"10.1524/MIAL.2012.0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1524/MIAL.2012.0019","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In ‘The Republic’, Plato famously reduced practical authority to theoretical authority, arguing that a just society must be governed by philosophers. This idea of the philosopher-king flourished in the medieval specula principum. The medieval papacy was grounded on a similar blend of practical and theoretical authority. The Pope was credited with the capacity to decide on the truth of beliefs because he was elected to office. In their fight against the omnicompetence of the Pope, Marsilius of Padua and William of Ockham were aware that in order to contain the power of the papal office, they had to find a way of legitimately distinguishing between theoretical and practical authority. Consequently, both of them severed the traditional link between political theory and virtue ethics, considering the virtue and the wisdom of the ruler as accidental to the legitimacy of government. In contrast to this demotion of theoretical authority in the state, both Marsilius and William argued that experts should play a bigger role in the church. The definition of true belief and heresy should not, according to them, lie in the hands of an elected official (i. e. the Pope), but rather in the hands of theological experts. This article aims to show that the critique of the papal monarchy gave rise to a new understanding of the distinction between theoretical and practical authority.","PeriodicalId":361460,"journal":{"name":"Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114768484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Drei Proben aus dem Fragenkreis „Erfahrung“ im mittelalterlichen gelehrten Recht 三个样本是从中世纪学者的“经验”问题中得到的

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/MIAL.2012.0020

K. W. Nörr

引用次数: 0

Expertus – experientia – experimentum. Neue Wege der wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis im Spätmittelalter ﹙实验﹚中世纪的科学知识的新方向

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/mial.2012.0021

J. Sarnowsky

引用次数: 0

Wahrnehmung – Experiment – Erinnerung. Erfahrung und Topik in Prosaromanen der Frühen Neuzeit 感知实验记忆经验与托克在早期早期平静生活

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/MIAL.2012.0023

U. Friedrich

引用次数: 1

Forum Mittelalter. Bericht über die Schweizer Mediävistik 论坛中世纪.瑞士所有医学研究报告

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/MIAL.2012.0026

M. Rohde

引用次数: 0

Intrikate Expertise. Die magische Pharmakognostik des Leonhard Thurneysser zum Thurn Intrikate专长.基因药理总监

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/MIAL.2012.0025

T. Bulang

引用次数: 0

Experientia lucrativa? Erfahrungswissen und Wissenserfahrung im europäischen Mittelalter Experientia lucrativa ?中世纪的欧洲人的知识和学习

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/MIAL.2012.0024

Martin Kintzinger

{"title":"Experientia lucrativa? Erfahrungswissen und Wissenserfahrung im europäischen Mittelalter","authors":"Martin Kintzinger","doi":"10.1524/MIAL.2012.0024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1524/MIAL.2012.0024","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this essay Martin Kintzinger takes as his starting point observations on the current debate regarding knowledge and asserts a lack of reflection on the status of knowledge in pre-modern societies. In Sebastian Brant’s work ‘Narrenschiff’ and other contemporary critical writings, Kintzinger finds evidence that the medieval critique of experts was not by necessity a critique of expertise per se. Rather, it often was a critique of an expertise based on purely theoretical book learning, deemed unpractical and inapplicable. Significantly, there existed a counter-conception of an expert who possessed both theoretical knowledge and practical experience and who was deemed practically able to cure disease, or give valuable legal advice etc. Of course, the term experientia was first used in this context only around 1600. But Kintzinger argues that experience-based knowledge, which is associated with inductive inference and the modern natural sciences, was not a product of the early modern period. Rather, the notion of experience as a warrant of true knowledge was heavily rooted in medieval thought. This essay subsequently traces the emergence of the notion of experience to Scholasticism, to the thought of Thomas Aquinas and Albert the Great and to the medieval debate on the dualism between the arts and science, and between empiricus and theoricus respectively.","PeriodicalId":361460,"journal":{"name":"Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128495604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

O vitae experientia dux. Die Rolle der Erfahrung im theoretischen und praktischen Weltbezug des frühen Humanismus und ihre Konsequenzen ﹙阿力制片室﹚在早期人文主义的理论与实践中所起的作用以及产生的后果

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/mial.2012.0022

Eckhard Kessler

{"title":"O vitae experientia dux. Die Rolle der Erfahrung im theoretischen und praktischen Weltbezug des frühen Humanismus und ihre Konsequenzen","authors":"Eckhard Kessler","doi":"10.1524/mial.2012.0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1524/mial.2012.0022","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The essay is divided into five sections: the first section gives a short overview of the history of “experience” – Greek empeiria, Latin experientia – which takes Aristotle’s theory of knowledge as its starting point. Within its theoretical framework, experience served as a crucial mediator between sensory perception and intellectual knowledge. In the philosophy of Late Antiquity and the High Middle Ages the category of experience then was reduced to marginal importance under neo-Platonic and Arabic influences. At the dusk of the Middle Ages, however, it was rehabilitated and turned into a rallying cry by those who attempted to overcome late medieval philosophy. The following section describes the revaluation of experience as the fountain of real knowledge under the auspices of Petrarchism, which ran contrary to the formalistic teachings of the Scholastics. The remaining sections first deal with the role of the humanist concept of experience in the field of moral philosophy (specifically regarding the teaching of history). Secondly, it shows how experience worked as an incentive for field research in natural history and medicine and how it precipitated a revival of ancient Aristotelian empiricism within natural philosophy, thereby paving the way for the modern empirical science of nature.","PeriodicalId":361460,"journal":{"name":"Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127295051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Einleitung. Experten zwischen scientia und experientia 引言.该小组制片室的专家

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/MIAL.2012.0017

Hedwig Röckelein

引用次数: 0

Experientia lucrativa? Erfahrungswissen und Wissenserfahrung im europäischen Mittelalter Experientia lucrativa ?中世纪的欧洲人的知识和学习

Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1524/mial.2012.0028

Martin Kintzinger

{"title":"Experientia lucrativa? Erfahrungswissen und Wissenserfahrung im europäischen Mittelalter","authors":"Martin Kintzinger","doi":"10.1524/mial.2012.0028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1524/mial.2012.0028","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this essay Martin Kintzinger takes as his starting point observations on the current debate regarding knowledge and asserts a lack of reflection on the status of knowledge in pre-modern societies. In Sebastian Brant’s work ‘Narrenschiff’ and other contemporary critical writings, Kintzinger finds evidence that the medieval critique of experts was not by necessity a critique of expertise per se. Rather, it often was a critique of an expertise based on purely theoretical book learning, deemed unpractical and inapplicable. Significantly, there existed a counter-conception of an expert who possessed both theoretical knowledge and practical experience and who was deemed practically able to cure disease, or give valuable legal advice etc. Of course, the term experientia was first used in this context only around 1600. But Kintzinger argues that experience-based knowledge, which is associated with inductive inference and the modern natural sciences, was not a product of the early modern period. Rather, the notion of experience as a warrant of true knowledge was heavily rooted in medieval thought. This essay subsequently traces the emergence of the notion of experience to Scholasticism, to the thought of Thomas Aquinas and Albert the Great and to the medieval debate on the dualism between the arts and science, and between empiricus and theoricus respectively.","PeriodicalId":361460,"journal":{"name":"Das Mittelalter Das Mittelalter","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129134943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0