Ethics in Progress最新文献_第4页

The “Unhappy Consciousness”. A Paradigm of Reason’s Speculative Power “不快乐的意识”。理性思辨能力的范式

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2022.1.7

Lara Scaglia

{"title":"The “Unhappy Consciousness”. A Paradigm of Reason’s Speculative Power","authors":"Lara Scaglia","doi":"10.14746/eip.2022.1.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2022.1.7","url":null,"abstract":"One way to address the question concerning the nature of reason consists in inquiring rational anxieties such as the tension between changeable and unchangeable. The yearning of the particular towards the universal, the iterative, interminable quest of the thinking is namely something which seems to be proper of many systems of classical German philosophy (but not only). In this paper I want to consider this problematic focusing on the figure of the unhappy consciousness which is perhaps the clearest expression of this tension and use it to approach Hegel’s account on speculative reason. After recalling – in the first section – the figures which precede the unhappy consciousness, I will address the question concerning the historicity and universality of the development of the consciousness, asking if it is the case that the unhappy consciousness belongs only to a particular historical age (and needs specific historical preconditions) or if it expresses a general feature of reason or of human experience. In the second and the third sections, namely, I will try to defend this second interpretation by showing that the unhappy consciousness not only is central in Hegel’s system and is re-echoed in several figures of the Phenomenology of the Spirit but it is also central in other philosophical systems. For instance, as I will show in the fourth section, Kant’s ethical thinking could be read under the light of the unhappy consciousness, whose unsatisfied yearning towards the universal is the expression and source of the speculative or metaphysical thinking.","PeriodicalId":36100,"journal":{"name":"Ethics in Progress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44496086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Hegel’s Concept of Right 黑格尔的权利观

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2022.1.3

C. Horn

引用次数: 0

The Aesthetic Implications of Fichte on Feeling 费希特的情感美学意蕴

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2022.1.5

P. Lohmann

{"title":"The Aesthetic Implications of Fichte on Feeling","authors":"P. Lohmann","doi":"10.14746/eip.2022.1.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2022.1.5","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the connection between art and emotion in Fichte’s work and its contemporary reception by the architect Karl Friedrich Schinkel. For the latter, not only selected architectural theoretical studies but also Schinkel’s ideal architectural designs are consulted. Schinkel knew Fichte personally and held him in high esteem. This is evidenced by some of Schinkel’s verbatim references to various forms of the Wissenschaftslehre and its sub-disciplines, as well as his extremely precise transcripts of lectures around the Berlin versions of the Wissenschaftslehre (around 1800). Schinkel was not only interested in the political and religious implications of Fichte’s theory of a cultural history of humankind, but his engagement with Fichte is also characterized above all by the theory of consciousness. This aspect plays a central role in the article. In recourse to the aesthetic emotion of the mind, a main concern of Fichte’s philosophy is to be placed in the horizon of architecture, which manifests itself in these questions: how does one convey a realisation in such a way that the recipient reconstructs it almost independently and it becomes a practical value for him as a criterion for his orientation in life? And furthermore – related to the research discourse on Fichte, which has only recently taken note of his aesthetic position and in particular his comments on architecture – how can this model of cognition be applied in his work from an architect’s point of view? In the investigation part on Fichte for this, first the feeling is reconstructed within the framework of the scientific-systematic philosophy as the reason of consciousness, in order to show with it the instance of the question relevant for Schinkel about the pedagogical effectiveness of a life-practical cultivating architecture. In the examination section on Schinkel, it is shown how Schinkel, in the horizon of Fichte, undertakes a determination of the relationship between feeling and ratio, with which he, for his part, establishes architecture as an instrument of cultivation.","PeriodicalId":36100,"journal":{"name":"Ethics in Progress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43119568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Social and Institutional Dimensions of Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition (by Marcin J. Byczyński, 2021). A Book Review with a Contextual ‘Surplus’ 阿克塞尔·洪内斯承认理论的社会和制度维度（Marcin J.Byczyński著，2021）。带有上下文“盈余”的书评

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2022.1.11

Ewa Nowak

引用次数: 0

The Topicality of Hegel’s Concept of “Bildung” for Our Liberal Society 黑格尔“建设”概念对我国自由社会的时代性

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2022.1.6

J. Zovko

引用次数: 0

Cross-Cultural Reflections on Citizen’s and Mankind’s Moral Identity as a Foundation of Community with a Shared Future 公民与人类道德认同作为人类命运共同体基础的跨文化思考

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2022.1.10

Shaogang Yang

{"title":"Cross-Cultural Reflections on Citizen’s and Mankind’s Moral Identity as a Foundation of Community with a Shared Future","authors":"Shaogang Yang","doi":"10.14746/eip.2022.1.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2022.1.10","url":null,"abstract":"Citizens’ moral identity is not only reflected on the individual level, but also in terms of belongingness, community, and even cosmopolitanism. It is the basic demand of a community with a shared future in morality. Moral identity is closely related to moral behavior, and the study of moral identity can predict one’s moral behavior. Community is the cultural basis of citizens’ moral identity. To study citizens’ moral identity in the community can also enable one to predict people’s moral behavior in that community. At present, the construction of a community with a shared future still lacks a species moral identity generally recognized by all cultures and countries. In order to achieve that goal, we must strengthen cultural inclusion, advocate and practice species moral identity of a community with a shared future. Species moral identity is based on the existence of humankind as a species with autonomous identity, so it is necessary to establish the mechanism of cultural respect and equal discussion, and to strengthen the construction of the species moral identity. Only in that way can we accomplish the mission of establishing species moral identity. In the following paper, I will advocate for these ideas with Kant’s and Marx’ thoughts. \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":36100,"journal":{"name":"Ethics in Progress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46946865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Topoi of Classical German Philosophy in Progress. A Thematic Issue Dedicated to Jakub Kloc-Konkołowicz 德国古典哲学的拓扑学。Jakub Kloc Konkołowicz专题刊

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2022.1.1

Rainer Adolphi, Lara Scaglia, T. Rockmore, Ewa Nowak

引用次数: 0

Hegel’s Concept of Action between Deflationary Approaches and The Science of Logic 黑格尔在紧缩方法与逻辑科学之间的作用概念

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2022.1.8

Yuliia Tereshchenko

{"title":"Hegel’s Concept of Action between Deflationary Approaches and The Science of Logic","authors":"Yuliia Tereshchenko","doi":"10.14746/eip.2022.1.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2022.1.8","url":null,"abstract":"The research in this paper attempts to outline the connection between Hegel’s concept of action and the contemporary philosophy of action. Hegel’s concept of action has some features in common with the ideas of analytical philosophers, and might open unexpected integration of these different philosophical traditions, which would contribute to the development of both of them. A brief overview of ways to comprehend Hegel’s concept of action (from Taylor to Brandom) shows that the cause of ambiguous understandings of this concept lies in the complexity of Hegel’s approach. The following article highlights the tension between “deflationary” interpretations and the complexity of Hegel´s original approach. Further, by revisiting the Section “Teleology” in Hegel’s Science of Logic, the article illustrates how deflationary interpretations of human action can be improved, so that they are topical for both contemporary practical philosophy and the philosophy of action, beyond the unnecessary split between analytical vs. continental philosophy. Such concepts as “purpose” and “mediation” become crucial, as they have sociological and normative extensions in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, as discussed in the last Section of this article. ","PeriodicalId":36100,"journal":{"name":"Ethics in Progress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48835000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“Consciousness in Its Own Self Provides Its Own Standard”. Hegel and the Spirit as a Process of Thinking “自我意识提供自己的标准”。黑格尔与作为思维过程的精神

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2022.1.4

Violetta L. Waibel

引用次数: 0

Philosophy of the Deed. “Praxis” in Hegel and Posthegelian Discourses 行为哲学。黑格尔与后黑格尔话语中的“实践”

Ethics in Progress Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.14746/eip.2021.2.8

Andreas Arndt

引用次数: 0