THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE最新文献

{"title":"Interpretation of laws as form of law implementation","authors":"V. Kostytsky","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-4","url":null,"abstract":"1. Kostytskyi M. V. Psykholohichni pytannia yurydychnoi vidpovidalnosti (krytyka prezumptsii «neznannia zakonu nezvilniaie vid vidpovidalnosti») / M. V. Kostytskyi // Yurydychna psykholohiia ta pedahohika. – 2011. – № 2 (10). – S. 3.\u0000\u00002. Opotiak S. Z. Teorii tlumachennia pravovykh norm (iurydychna pryroda ta pidkhody do tlumachennia pravovykhnorm) / S. Z. Opotiak // Biuleten Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy. – 2011. - № 4. – S. 122-127. – Rezhym dostupu: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/bmju_2011_4_18\u0000\u00003. Molyboha M. P. Funktsii ta metody tlumachennia prava / M. P. Molyboha // Biuleten Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy. –2010. – № 11. – S. 12; Paleshnyk S. I. Tlumachennia v sudovii praktytsi: poniattia, osoblyvosti, vydy : dys. ... kand.yuryd. nauk : 12.00.01 / S. I. Paleshnyk ; Nats. yuryd. un-t im. Yaroslava Mudroho. – Kharkiv, 2016. – S. 11-12.\u0000\u00004. Malynova Y. P. Fylosofyia prava (ot metafyzyky k hermenevtyke) : monohrafyia / Y. P. Malynova. – Ekaterynburh: UrHIuA, 1995. – S. 82.\u0000\u00005. Sadovskyi M. M. Teoretyko-pravovi zasady doktrynalnoho tlumachennia prava : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01 /M. M. Sadovskyi; Klasychnyi pryvatnyi universytet. – Zaporizhzhia, 2017. – S. 21.\u0000\u00006. Dvorkin R. Serioznyi pohliad na prava / R. Dvorkin ; per. z anhl. A. Frolkin. – Kyiv : Vyd-vo Solomii Pavlychko «Osnovy», 2000. – S. 52.\u0000\u00007. Cherdantsev A. F. Tolkovanye prava y dohovora / A. F. Cherdantsev. – Moskva : Yunyty-Dana, 2003. – S. 104.\u0000\u00008. Pryima S. V. Pryntsypy tlumachennia norm prava : avtoref. dys ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01 / S.V. Pryima; Natsionalna yuryd. akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho. – Kharkiv, 2011 – 18 s.; Samilo H. O. Problemy tlumachennia pravovykh norm : navch.-metod. posib. / H. O. Samilo. – Zaporizhzhia : ZNTU, 2017. – S. 47.\u0000\u00009. Rysheliuk A. M. Zakonotvorchist v Ukraini: navch. posib / A. M. Rysheliuk. – Kyiv : Vyd-vo NADU, 2004 // https://pidruchniki.com/83139/pravo/tlumachennya_zakonu.\u0000\u000010. Shevchuk S. Osnovy konstytutsiinoi yurysprudentsii / S. Shevchuk. – Kyiv : Ukrainskyi tsentr pravnychykh studii, 2001. – S. 210-211.\u0000\u000011. Sadovskyi M. M. Teoretyko-pravovi zasady doktrynalnoho tlumachennia prava : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.01 /M. M. Sadovskyi; Klasychnyi pryvatnyi universytet. – Zaporizhzhia, 2017. – S. 113.\u0000\u000012. Havrylov D. A. Pravoprymenytelnoe tolkovanye: dyss. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.01 / D. A. Havrylov; Volhohradskyi hos. un-t. – Volhohrad, 2000. – S. 5-6.\u0000\u000013. Sotsuro L. V. Neofytsyalnoe tolkovanye norm rossyiskoho prava : avtoref. dys. … dokt. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.01 / L.V. Sotsuro. – Moskva, 1998. – S. 17.\u0000\u000014. Skakun O. F. Teoriia derzhavy i prava : pidruchnyk / O. F. Skakun. – Kharkiv : Konsum, 2008. – S. 410.\u0000\u000015. Sadovskyi M. M. Teoretyko-pravovi zasady doktrynalnoho tlumachennia prava : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.01 /M. M. Sadovskyi; Klasychnyi pryvatnyi universytet. – Zaporizhzhia, 2017. – S. 139.\u0000\u000016. Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava: pidruchnyk / za zah. red. M. V. Tsvika, O. V. Petryshyna. – Kharkiv : P","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125568768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Problems of legal regulation of the form of the loan agreement in the civil legislation of Ukraine","authors":"I. V. Plavych","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-51","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-51","url":null,"abstract":"In the article the author investigates the legal regulation of the form of the loan agreement as a transaction and a document. In examining the written form of the loan agreement, the author argues that the written form of the agreement should be understood as a contract whose content is information expressed in letters, signs, numbers, hieroglyphs, or any signs and symbols that can be applied by chemical compounds or mechanically , the value of which is known to persons who use it, which does not depend on the specific type of media, is guaranteed to ensure the integrity of the content of the contract, and allow to identify its parties. In the article the author proves the imperfection of the norms of Article 1047 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. According to the author, not only the effect of Article 1047 of the Civil Code of Ukraine on the form of the loan agreement applies to the loan agreement as a transaction, but also the effect of Articles 206 and 208 of the Civil Code of Ukraine on the written form of the transaction. In order to save legislative material and eliminate inconsistencies between the provisions of Articles 208 and 1047 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, the author proposes amendments to remove from Article 1047 of the Civil Code of Ukraine special rules on the written form of this agreement, which are different from Article 208 of the Civil Code. In turn, due to the imperfection of Article 208 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, in terms of the amount of the contract, which requires a written form, the author proposes to replace the reference in this article of the Code to the tax-free minimum income for another indicator that changes more frequently, and more responsive to existing in the country inflation or by fixing in law a specific amount, which the legislator may periodically change if necessary. The author also considers the state of legal regulation in Ukraine of the procedure for concluding a contract by electronic means of communication. Given their imperfection, the author considers it appropriate to group the basic rules on the procedure for concluding such transactions in Chapter 16, Section IV of the Civil Code of Ukraine. The author also considers it inexpedient to have in part twelve of Article 11 of the Law of Ukraine «On Electronic Commerce» norms that equate an electronic agreement concluded by exchanging electronic messages to an agreement concluded in writing.\u0000\u0000Keywords: contract, transaction, document, contract form, transaction form, document form.","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126477512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Interpretation of law: axiological vector of development","authors":"O. Varych","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-22","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the axiological vectors of the interpretation of law through the prism of clarifying the theoretical and legal interpretation of understanding the nature of the interpretation of law as, on the one hand - the thinking process of the subject who studies the rule of law, clarifies and explains its content, and on the other - explanation of the content of the rule of law. It is also established that the interpretation of law should be studied in terms of the static content of the rule of law and the dynamics of law itself, social transformations that can change the format of legal thinking, quality and effectiveness of interpretation of legal requirements. It has been found that the comprehension of the «spirit» of a legal prescription is valuable in the process of interpretation, and the interpretation should not change or supplement the existing legal prescription.\u0000\u0000Keywords: interpretation, interpretation of law, axiological vectors of development of interpretation of law","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116034938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Genesis of court practice and judicial precedent","authors":"A. Melnyk","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-32","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-32","url":null,"abstract":"The problem of judicial lawmaking is one of the urgent problems for modern legal science. The subject of the study is the genesis of judicial practice and judicial precedent to identify the possibility of using them as full-fledged sources of Ukrainian law, the development of this problem is associated with improving the quality of legislation. Сonsiders the issues of judicial practice and judicial precedent in the world of judicial lawmaking in the field of jurisprudence.The article, based on a historical approach, examines in detail the nature of judicial precedent and judicial practice,analyzes the factors that influenced their development and formation. A historical and legal analysis of the peculiarities of formation and development of judicial practice, and judicial precedent in the Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic legal families. Attention is drawn to the uncertainty about the role of judicial precedent in the legal system during the formation and development of the Romano-Germanic legal family.\u0000\u0000Keywords: case law, judicial precedent, source of law, legislation, court decisions.","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133712974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The concept of «liberties» in the Ukrainian legal tradition and legal documents of the XV – early XX centuries","authors":"L. V. Khudoyar","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-44","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-44","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the consideration of the legal aspect of the concept of «liberties» in the historical and legal reality of the XV – early XX centuries. Researchers’ interpretations of the meaning of the concept of «liberties» of the Middle Ages and the Cossack-Hetman era are considered. An attempt has been made to consider the notion of «liberties» in relation to the notion of «rights» and the legal tradition of the time. It is noted that by the eighteenth century. the actual meaning of the concept of «liberties» was the legal status of a person, group of persons, full status, as well as the legal regime of the territory.\u0000\u0000The concept of «liberties» for five hundred years reflected the dynamics of social values by enshrining them in legal documents and the rule of law. This concept has evolved in accordance with the transformations of legal reality and legal life of society, the genesis of legal understanding, the development of legal terminology and the conceptual apparatus. The course of the struggle of the Ukrainian population for their rights and freedoms led to the dominance of the problem of rights and freedoms in the legal consciousness and in the legal life of the then Ukrainian society. The meaning of the concept of «liberties» was formed as a result of a combination in the minds of the people of the Western philosophical tradition, religious, spiritual and legal values and ideology of the then Ukrainian politicum. For a long period from XV to XVIII centuries. in fact, the meaning of the concept of «liberties» was the legal status (scope of rights and freedoms) of a person, group of persons, estates, as well as the legal regime of the territory. In the early twentieth century. the concept of «liberties» was included in the texts of the constitutional acts of the UPR. This is explained, in our opinion, by two reasons: the authors’ attempt to emphasize the longevity and continuity of the national legal tradition and the imperfection of the terminology and the then conceptual apparatus of legal science. However, other variants of the meaning of the concept of «liberties» are not excluded, in particular, in the understanding of the political rights of a particular community. This question requires further, deeper research.\u0000\u0000Keywords: liberties, law, freedom, Ukrainian legal tradition, legal status of the Ukrainian population, legal regime of the territory of residence of the Ukrainian population, legal values","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123340309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ensuring the exercise of the right to access to justice as a mandatory attribute of a constitutional state","authors":"Y. Sverba","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-52","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-52","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes both the positive and negative obligations of the state regarding the right to access to justice. Based on the principle of separation of powers into legislative, executive and judicial, emphasis on the need for real justice in constitutional state, as well as ensuring its accessibility, is made.\u0000\u0000Some aspects of the European Court of Human Rights case-law in the field of access to justice are considered. It is also hypothesized that the ECtHR case-law ensures the dynamic development of the European Convention on Human Rights provisions. In particular, the article analyses several ECtHR decisions which explicitly state that the Convention is intended to guarantee not theoretical and illusory, but practical and effective rights («Matthews v. The United Kingdom», «Bellet v. France and others»).\u0000\u0000The decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine is studied, which, inter alia, reveals the special role of constitutional and administrative proceedings in ensuring the rule of law. The obligation of the state to ensure equal access to justice is stated, since the purpose of justice is to protect violated, disputed rights, freedoms that belong directly to the person applying to the court for their protection. Therefore, the exercise of the right guaranteed by part two of Article 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine to appeal court decisions, actions or omissions of subjects of power must be ensured in accordance with the stated purpose of justice. At the same time, this right connects to the opportunity of every person to justify before the court conviction in the illegality of interference by the subjects of power in rights and freedoms concerned.\u0000\u0000The article analyses the decision of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, which reveals the legal nature of ensuring access to justice in criminal, or administrative offenses. \u0000\u0000It is stated that the attributes of the rule of law are not limited to the justice and access to it, and their autonomous existence is impossible in a society where other democratic institutions do not work.\u0000\u0000Keywords: the rule of law, justice, access to justice, constitutional state, human rights, legal aid.","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123485465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Introductory remarks","authors":"Y. Shemshuchenko","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127967999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Anthropocentrism as a paradigm of legal science: historical origins and modern context","authors":"S. Suniehin","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-41","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-41","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the historical origins of anthropocentrism as a basic paradigm of developmentof modern jurisprudence and the peculiarities of its transformation in today’s conditions. It is noted that with the beginning of the Renaissance anthropocentrism finally began to take shape in a fundamental system of ideas and principles of philosophical and ideological significance, which laid radical changes in European public consciousness associated with the formation of an autonomous worldview, which is completely self-sufficient, free and does not depend on any supernatural influences. In the future, these ideas were significantly developed during the Reformation and the Enlightenment, which became a natural consequence of the establishment of the principle of individualism in social life. It is on the basis of methodological ideas of the Enlightenment was finally formed liberal ideology with an appropriate system of its main trends in various sectors and areas of public life.\u0000\u0000Emphasis is placed on the fact that during a long historical period, liberal ideology has passed a complex and contradictory path of its development, as a result of which it has acquired the qualities of global scale and the basic basis of building a modern democratic state governed by the rule of law. The peculiarity of the current stage of development of liberalism is the gradual radicalization of the content of its main provisions, which is associated with rapid scientific and technological progress and the functioning of a new information and technological reality, within which each individual receives almost unlimited opportunities to create and disseminate an ideas and concepts of their virtual existence, including any identities.\u0000\u0000As a result of research the following conclusions are made:\u0000\u00001. Centuries of social practice of free development of individuals in our time has led to a special type of civilization, the main feature of which is that it develops in opposition to the traditional type of culture, which increasingly takes aggressive forms of expression at the macro and micro levels. In this context, we are talking about the fact that modern radical liberalism (libertarianism) rejects the objective and true essence of the surrounding phenomena and processes, thus turning any object of scientific or other way of knowing the diverse reality into a subjective opinion about it.\u0000\u00002. Modern liberal ideology and postmodernist discourse significantly complicates the main task of legal science –the development and systematization of objective knowledge about state and legal phenomena, the laws of their functioning and development. The latter, in turn, is due to the fact that the unlimited freedom to choose the original axiomatic principles of scientific activity, the basic semantic contexts and values of its implementation, leads to many answers to the challenges posed by legal science. In this way, the only scientific truth based on the so-called ","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133214371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Legal procedure of official interpretation of legal texts","authors":"K. Nykolyna","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-34","url":null,"abstract":"The scientific article is devoted to the substantiation of the procedural nature of the official interpretation of legal texts. The author emphasizes that it is on the official interpretation that legally significant decisions are based, which establish the specific rights and obligations of the subjects. However, today there are no systematized methodological recommendations, requirements, officially established legal procedure and principles of interpretive activity, which could determine common standards of official interpretation.\u0000\u0000The procedure of interpretation consists in the sequence of actions of the authorized subjects within separate stages.The article formulates the author’s definition of legal interpretation procedure as a system of successive legally significant actions of authorized entities, which are aimed at clarifying, constructing and explaining to other legal entities the meaning and scope of legal norms formulated in legal texts.\u0000\u0000Taking into account the latest methodological approaches to interpretation and the requirements of the rule of law,the author reveals the content of legal interpretation, which consists of separate stages, which in turn include a number of successive procedures. In particular, the stage of clarifying the content of the legal text involves the following procedures: initial study of the legal text and the form of its consolidation in the provisions of the legal act, comprehensive analysis of the legal text, analysis of the received interpretation in terms of justice, human rights, rule of law, design normative rule. The explanation, according to the author, includes the following procedures: preparation of a draft interpretative act, namely a legal document that contains an explanation of the content and application of the legal norm, formulated by the authorized body within its competence; adoption of a legal interpretation act, making it universally binding for all those who apply the clarified rules of law; promulgation of an interpretative act, namely, bringing its content to the attention of society or law enforcement agencies; control over the use of the act of interpretation of the law by the subjects of its application; generalization of legal interpretative acts in order to systematize them. \u0000\u0000Given the importance of official interpretation of legal texts, the feasibility of determining at least the general principles of legal interpretation at the regulatory level is considered.\u0000\u0000Keywords: interpretation of law, official interpretation, legal procedure, legal interpretation activity.","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131609258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The concept of «State Sovereignty» in classical Western theoriesand modern domestic political science","authors":"O. V. Skripnyuk, A. Krusyan","doi":"10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2021-12-2","url":null,"abstract":"1.Kuyan I. A. Suverenitet: problemy teoriyi i praktyky: konstytutsiyno-pravovyy aspekt : monohrafiya. Kyyiv : VTS «Akademiya», 2013. 560 s.\u0000\u00002.Pravove zabezpechennya derzhavnoho suverenitetu Ukrayiny : monohrafiya / YU. S. Shemshuchenko, V. M. Shapoval,I. O. Kresina, V. P. Horbatenko, I. V. Alyeksyeyenko, O. V. Skrypnyuk, D. YE. Prokopov, I. A. Kuyan, O. I. Yushchyk,D. M. Luk’yanetsʹ, O. M. Kostenko, V. O. Antonov, N. M. Parkhomenko, O. V. Batanov, Z. M. Makarukha / Za zah.red. akad. NAN Ukrayiny YU. S. Shemshuchenka. Kyyiv : Vyd-vo «Yurydychna dumka», 2011. 300 s.\u0000\u00003.Tam samo.\u0000\u00004. Mamut L. S. Narod v pravovom hosudarstve. Moskva : NORMA, 1999. 150 s.\u0000\u00005.Rishennya Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny vid 5.10.2005 r., № 6-rp/2005 u spravi za konstytutsiynym podannyam 60 narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny pro ofitsiyne tlumachennya polozhenʹ chastyny pershoyi statti 103 Konstytutsiyi Ukrayiny v konteksti polozhenʹ yiyi statey 5, 156 ta za konstytutsiynym zvernennyam hromadyan Halaychuka Vadyma Serhiyovycha, Podhornoyi Viktoriyi Valentynivny, Kysloyi Tetyany Volodymyrivny pro ofitsiyne tlumachennya polozhenʹ chastyn druhoyi, tretʹoyi, chetvertoyi statti 5 Konstytutsiyi Ukrayiny (sprava pro zdiysnennya vlady narodom). Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. 2005. № 41. St. 2605.\u0000\u00006.Konstytutsiyno-pravovi formy bezposerednʹoyi demokratiyi v Ukrayini: problemy teoriyi i praktyky. Do 10-yi rechnytsi nezalezhnosti Ukrayiny / Pohorilko V. F., Stavniychuk M. I., Ruda N. I. ta in. Kyyiv : In-t derzhavy i prava im. V.M. Koretsʹkoho NAN Ukrayiny, 2001. 356 s.\u0000\u00007.Vlada v Ukrayini: shlyakhy do efektyvnosti / holova red. rady O. D. Svyatotsʹkyy. Kyyiv : Zhurn. «Pravo Ukrayiny» : In Yure, 2010. 688 s.\u0000\u00008.Shcherbanyuk O.V. Narodnyy suverenitet i realizatsiya vladospromozhnosti demokratychnoyi derzhavy : monohrafiya. Kyyiv: Lohos, 2013. 306 s.\u0000\u00009.Velykyy entsyklopedychnyy yurydychnyy slovnyk / za red. akad. NAN Ukrayiny YU. S. Shemshuchenka. 2-he vyd., pererobl. i dopovn. Kyyiv : Vyd-vo «Yurydychna dumka», 2012. 1020 s.\u0000\u000010.Pravove zabezpechennya derzhavnoho suverenitetu Ukrayiny : monohrafiya / YU. S. Shemshuchenko, V. M. Shapoval,I. O. Kresina, V. P. Horbatenko, I. V. Alyeksyeyenko, O. V. Skrypnyuk, D. YE. Prokopov, I. A. Kuyan, O. I. Yushchyk,D. M. Luk’yanetsʹ, O. M. Kostenko, V. O. Antonov, N. M. Parkhomenko, O. V. Batanov, Z. M. Makarukha / Za zah.red. akad. NAN Ukrayiny YU. S. Shemshuchenka. Kyyiv : Vyd-vo «Yurydychna dumka», 2011. 300 s.\u0000\u000011.Skakun O. F. Teoryya hosudarstva y prava (éntsyklopedycheskyy kurs) : uchebnyk. Kharʹkov: Éspada, 2005. 840 s.\u0000\u000012. Kuyan I. A. Suverenitet: problemy teoriyi i praktyky: konstytutsiyno-pravovyy aspekt : monohrafiya. Kyyiv : VTS «Akademiya», 2013. 560 s.\u0000\u000013. Zhakke ZH-P. Konstytutsyonnoe pravo y polytycheskye ynstytuty / per. s fr. V. V. Maklakova. Moskva : «Yuryst», 2002. 365 s.\u0000\u000014. Shapoval V. M. Suchasnyy konstytutsionalizm. Kyyiv : Salkom ; Yurinkom Inter, 2005. 560 s.\u0000\u000015.Frytsʹkyy YU. O. Derzhavna vlada v Ukrayini: stanovlennya, orhaniz","PeriodicalId":359905,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERPRETATION OF LAW: FROM THE THEORY TO THE PRACTICE","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134256138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}