发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Intentionality Challenge 意向性挑战
The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0007
M. Textor
{"title":"The Intentionality Challenge","authors":"M. Textor","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"The chapter introduces and assesses Brentano’s and Marty’s arguments against Mach’s Neutral Monism. These arguments concern the intentionality of sensation and the intentionality of expectation.","PeriodicalId":359391,"journal":{"name":"The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics","volume":"668 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122968007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Act/Content/Object, Act/Object, or Just Object? 行为/内容/对象，行为/对象，还是仅仅是对象?
The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0010
M. Textor
{"title":"Act/Content/Object, Act/Object, or Just Object?","authors":"M. Textor","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0010","url":null,"abstract":"Thus chapter revolves around the act/content/object distinction. Russell characterized Austrian Psychology, Cambridge Realism, Idealism, and Neutral Monism with respect to their different treatments of this distinction. The Cambridge Realists like Russell and Moore argued that the distinction between act and object is given introspectively, but that there is no distinction between content and object. The Neutral Monists (American Realists) like James argued that there is no act/object distinction and that, consequently, there is no intrinsic distinction between the mental and physical. Russell changed tack by arguing for the existence of the distinction on the basis of ‘hypotheses’. He held a hybrid position: there is no act/object distinction in sensation, but the full act/content/object distinction in thought. The chapter assesses arguments in favour of the act/object distinction and against the act/content/object distinction.","PeriodicalId":359391,"journal":{"name":"The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124776676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brentano’s One-Term View of Judgement 布伦塔诺的单期判断观
The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0011
M. Textor
{"title":"Brentano’s One-Term View of Judgement","authors":"M. Textor","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0011","url":null,"abstract":"The view that (atomic) judgements have at least ‘two terms’—predicate something of an object or objects—is a widely held one in philosophy. The chapter introduces the two-term dogma about judgement as the background for Brentano’s view of judgement. Brentano challenged the dogma and argued that an acknowledgement of an object is a judgement but has only one term. The chapter considers Brentano’s argument in favour of the one-term view and connects them to our understanding of non-epistemic perception. Brentano’s one-term view of judgement will be the philosophical contrary to the two-term views of judgement of the positivists that will figure in chapter 11.","PeriodicalId":359391,"journal":{"name":"The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129600956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Drawing the Limits of Knowledge 画出知识的极限
The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0014
M. Textor
{"title":"Drawing the Limits of Knowledge","authors":"M. Textor","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0014","url":null,"abstract":"Metaphysicians hold that there are two kinds of real things: those that are truly real and those that are less real. The former are the grounds of the latter. Metaphysics is supposed to be knowledge of the truly real things; the reality that underlies appearances. Schlick argued (i) that metaphysics so understood needs to have a special source of knowledge distinct from the sources of knowledge on which science and common sense rely and (ii) that there is no such source of knowledge. Hence, even if there are truly real objects and facts, they are beyond the limits of knowledge. Schlick concludes that there are no differences in degrees of being: all being is on a par. The chapter gives an overview of the metaphysicians attacked by Schlick and reconstructs his argument against metaphysical knowledge that is based on the two-term view of cognition.","PeriodicalId":359391,"journal":{"name":"The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129275932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信