布伦塔诺的单期判断观

M. Textor
{"title":"布伦塔诺的单期判断观","authors":"M. Textor","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The view that (atomic) judgements have at least ‘two terms’—predicate something of an object or objects—is a widely held one in philosophy. The chapter introduces the two-term dogma about judgement as the background for Brentano’s view of judgement. Brentano challenged the dogma and argued that an acknowledgement of an object is a judgement but has only one term. The chapter considers Brentano’s argument in favour of the one-term view and connects them to our understanding of non-epistemic perception. Brentano’s one-term view of judgement will be the philosophical contrary to the two-term views of judgement of the positivists that will figure in chapter 11.","PeriodicalId":359391,"journal":{"name":"The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brentano’s One-Term View of Judgement\",\"authors\":\"M. Textor\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The view that (atomic) judgements have at least ‘two terms’—predicate something of an object or objects—is a widely held one in philosophy. The chapter introduces the two-term dogma about judgement as the background for Brentano’s view of judgement. Brentano challenged the dogma and argued that an acknowledgement of an object is a judgement but has only one term. The chapter considers Brentano’s argument in favour of the one-term view and connects them to our understanding of non-epistemic perception. Brentano’s one-term view of judgement will be the philosophical contrary to the two-term views of judgement of the positivists that will figure in chapter 11.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn against Metaphysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198769828.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(原子的)判断至少有“两个项”,即一个或几个对象的谓词,这种观点在哲学上是很普遍的。本章介绍了作为布伦塔诺判断观背景的关于判断的两项教条。布伦塔诺对这一教条提出了挑战,他认为对一个客体的承认是一种判断,但只有一个术语。这一章考虑了布伦塔诺支持单术语观点的论点,并将它们与我们对非认识论感知的理解联系起来。布伦塔诺的单阶段判断观将是哲学上的对立面,与实证主义者的双阶段判断观相反,实证主义者的双阶段判断观将在第11章中出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brentano’s One-Term View of Judgement
The view that (atomic) judgements have at least ‘two terms’—predicate something of an object or objects—is a widely held one in philosophy. The chapter introduces the two-term dogma about judgement as the background for Brentano’s view of judgement. Brentano challenged the dogma and argued that an acknowledgement of an object is a judgement but has only one term. The chapter considers Brentano’s argument in favour of the one-term view and connects them to our understanding of non-epistemic perception. Brentano’s one-term view of judgement will be the philosophical contrary to the two-term views of judgement of the positivists that will figure in chapter 11.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信