Criminal Justice Ethics最新文献_第6页

Note from the Editor 编者注

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI: 10.1080/0731129x.2021.1951948

J. Jacobs

引用次数: 0

Note from the Editor 编辑器的注释

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129x.2021.1900648

Jonathan M. Jacobs

引用次数: 0

Policing, Brutality, and the Demands of Justice 治安、暴行与正义要求

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2021.1893930

L. Hunt

引用次数: 2

Making Artificial Intelligence Transparent: Fairness and the Problem of Proxy Variables 使人工智能透明:公平性与代理变量问题

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2021.1893932

Richard Warner, R. Sloan

{"title":"Making Artificial Intelligence Transparent: Fairness and the Problem of Proxy Variables","authors":"Richard Warner, R. Sloan","doi":"10.1080/0731129X.2021.1893932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1893932","url":null,"abstract":"AI-driven decisions can draw data from virtually any area of your life to make a decision about virtually any other area of your life. That creates fairness issues. Effective regulation to ensure fairness requires that AI systems be transparent. That is, regulators must have sufficient access to the factors that explain and justify the decisions. One approach to transparency is to require that systems be explainable, as that concept is understood in computer science. A system is explainable if one can provide a human-understandable explanation of why it makes any particular prediction. Explainability should not be equated with transparency. To address transparency and characterize its relation to explainability, we define transparency for a regulatory purpose. A system is transparent for a regulatory purpose (r-transparent) when and only when regulators have an explanation, adequate for that purpose, of why it yields the predictions it does. Explainability remains relevant to transparency but turns out to be neither necessary nor sufficient for it. The concepts of explainability and r-transparency combine to yield four possibilities: explainable and either r-transparent or not; and not explainable and either not r-transparent or r-transparent. Combining r-transparency with ideas from the Harvard computer scientist Cynthia Dwork, we propose four requirements on AI systems.","PeriodicalId":35931,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1893932","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48133791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

AI Challenges and the Inadequacy of Human Rights Protections 人工智能的挑战和人权保护的不足

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2021.1903709

Hin-Yan Liu

{"title":"AI Challenges and the Inadequacy of Human Rights Protections","authors":"Hin-Yan Liu","doi":"10.1080/0731129X.2021.1903709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1903709","url":null,"abstract":"My aim in this article is to set out some counter-intuitive claims about the challenges posed by artificial intelligence (AI) applications to the protection and enjoyment of human rights and to be your guide through my unorthodox ideas. While there are familiar human rights issues raised by AI and its applications, these are perhaps the easiest of the challenges because they are already recognized by the human rights regime as problems. Instead, the more pernicious challenges are those that have yet to be identified or articulated, because they arise from new affordances rather than directly through AI modeled as a technology. I suggest that we need to actively explore the potential problem space on this basis. I suggest that we need to adopt models and metaphors that systematically exclude the possibility of applying the human rights regime to AI applications. This orientation will present us with the difficult, intractable problems that most urgently require responses. There are convincing ways of understanding AI that lock out the very possibility for human rights responses and this should be grounds for serious concern. I suggest that responses need to exploit both sets of insights I present in this paper: first that proactive and systematic searches of the potential problem space need to be continuously conducted to find the problems that require responses; and second that the monopoly that the human rights regime holds with regards to addressing harm and suffering needs to be broken so that we can deploy a greater range of barriers against failures to recognize and remedy AI-induced wrongs.","PeriodicalId":35931,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1903709","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48456425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Retributivism and the Dynamic Desert Model: Three Challenges to Dagan and Roberts 报应主义与动态沙漠模型:对达甘和罗伯茨的三个挑战

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2021.1900649

J. Ryberg

引用次数: 1

Theaters of Pardoning 赦免剧场

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2021.1893931

M. Osler

引用次数: 0

Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Digital Fourth Amendment 成本效益分析与数字第四修正案

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3802008

A. Rozenshtein

引用次数: 0

Doing Without Desert 远离沙漠

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/0731129x.2020.1851447

David Sussman

引用次数: 0

The Promise of Procedural Abolitionism 程序废除主义的承诺

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/0731129x.2020.1842622

Chad W. Flanders

引用次数: 0