Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March最新文献

Truth, Beauty, and Justice in Models of Social Action 社会行动模式中的真、美和正义

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076007

Mark J. Zbaracki, Lee Watkiss, C. McAlpine, J. Barg

引用次数: 0

A Few Notes on Jim March as a Mentor 关于吉姆·马奇作为导师的几点说明

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076011

Mie Augier

引用次数: 0

Marching to the Sea: Little Ideas and Small Innovations in the Evolution of Amphibious Operations 向海洋进军:两栖作战演变中的小想法和小创新

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076002

Mie Augier, Sean F. X. Barrett

引用次数: 0

James March’s Lessons on Teaching 詹姆斯·马奇的《教学课》

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076010

T. Weil

{"title":"James March’s Lessons on Teaching","authors":"T. Weil","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076010","url":null,"abstract":"James G. March taught his students how to combine rigor and playfulness. He saw scholarship as the interplay between harnessing crazy ideas; the technology of foolishness on one side, and the rigorous building and assessment of models which emulate the behaviors of individuals in organizations and of organizations as a whole on the other side. Therefore, a student should develop not only an ability to understand the world, by mastering technical analytical methods, but also an ability to appreciate it. In order to develop the latter, one should grasp that the underlying problems of management and leadership are indistinguishable from the fundamental problems of life, and that the novels, poems and plays of great literature are the best sources to examine these problems. Thus, James March’s teaching involved basic skills in statistics, the subtle art of building models, and the study of major pieces of great literature. According to James March, teaching is not primarily about spreading knowledge but is about raising faith in scholarship. Learning is not aimed at adapting to the world, but at developing a desire to change it for more truth, beauty and justice. Higher education is a vision, a vocation, not a rational choice. Teaching is a sacrament.","PeriodicalId":350799,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122070596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Bringing the Logic of Appropriateness into the Lab: An Experimental Study of Behavior and Cognition 将适当性逻辑引入实验室:行为与认知的实验研究

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076009

Daniel A. Newark, Markus C. Becker

{"title":"Bringing the Logic of Appropriateness into the Lab: An Experimental Study of Behavior and Cognition","authors":"Daniel A. Newark, Markus C. Becker","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076009","url":null,"abstract":"The logic of consequences and the logic of appropriateness have long been central to understanding behavior in organizations. However, scholarly work on the logic of appropriateness has consisted mostly of conceptual clarification and ex post explanation of observed behavior. In an effort to facilitate the study of the logic of appropriateness through experimental methods, this paper introduces an experimental paradigm that allows for the manipulation of decision logic as an independent variable. Using this paradigm, 710 participants played four iconic behavioral games in which profitability and ethics are both at play and, sometimes, at odds: Prisoners’ Dilemma, Dictator Game, Ultimatum Game, and Trust Game. The manipulation generated behavioral data, as well as qualitative data about participants’ considerations while deciding according to each logic. The behavioral data show that, compared to participants employing a logic of consequences, participants employing a logic of appropriateness rejected more unfair offers in an Ultimatum Game and were more generous when reciprocating trusting behavior in a Trust Game. In all other cases, behavior between the two logics was not significantly different. An analysis of the qualitative data suggests that a logic of consequences increased participants’ focus on monetary concerns, whereas a logic of appropriateness increased participants’ focus on moral concerns. Taken together, these data provide new insights into when, how, and why the two logics result in behavioral and cognitive differences. The authors conclude by considering directions for future research that they see as particularly amenable to study using the experimental manipulation presented here.","PeriodicalId":350799,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March","volume":"602 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123321031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

A Personal Reflection on My Long Relationship with Jim March 我与吉姆·马奇长期关系的个人反思

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076012

Z. Shapira

引用次数: 0

The Logic of Appropriateness – A Central Concept in Institutional Theory 适当性逻辑——制度理论的核心概念

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076008

Tom Christensen, Per Lægreid

引用次数: 2

“Fools” with Impossible Goals: Mobilizing March’s Technology of Foolishness to Tackle Grand Challenges 目标不可能实现的“傻瓜”:动员马奇的愚蠢技术来应对重大挑战

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076005

Yanfei Hu, Claus Rerup

引用次数: 2

Learning about Scholarship and Being a Scholar: The Courage of Foolishness 学学术，做学者:愚笨的勇气

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076013

S. Sitkin

引用次数: 0

Adaptive Rationality, Garbage Cans, and the Policy Process 适应性理性、垃圾桶和政策过程

Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076004

Scott C. Ganz

{"title":"Adaptive Rationality, Garbage Cans, and the Policy Process","authors":"Scott C. Ganz","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076004","url":null,"abstract":"The inconsistency between the appearance of incoherence and chaos in the US policymaking process bringing about a historic record of legislative achievements in the 1960s and 1970s, on the one hand, and the emergence of hierarchical order bringing about a prolonged period of legislative impotence in the early 2000s, on the other hand, has led legislative scholars to revisit strongly held prior beliefs about legislative organization. Similar reevaluations of the garbage can model that emphasize the potential for conflict-ridden and chaotic organizations to be adaptively rational are ongoing in organizational theory. This paper adapts recent research on organizational design to explore the conditions under which decentralized, chaotic decision making facilitates more desirable legislative outcomes than centralized decision making controlled by a benevolent dictator. The author demonstrates that normative claims about legislative organization – much like normative claims about organizational design – should vary depending on the task environment faced by the legislature. In the face of rugged uncertainty in the mapping from policies to outcomes, decentralized decision making among modestly polarized legislators with fluid participation in decisions facilitates a functional mix of exploitative and exploratory search.","PeriodicalId":350799,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127302098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0