“Fools” with Impossible Goals: Mobilizing March’s Technology of Foolishness to Tackle Grand Challenges

Yanfei Hu, Claus Rerup
{"title":"“Fools” with Impossible Goals: Mobilizing March’s Technology of Foolishness to Tackle Grand Challenges","authors":"Yanfei Hu, Claus Rerup","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"James March argued that irrational approaches to problem solving and foolishness can be useful for addressing complex problems. Grand challenges are complex problems that often involve “guarded societal institutions” – societal beliefs and practices guarded by political or commercial powers. To explain how organizations with impossible goals dismantle such institutions by mobilizing irrationality and foolishness, we develop a process model which is illustrated with the case of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Our main contribution is to expand James March’s ideas on logics of action and organizational intelligence to advance a novel perspective for tackling big societal problems. We argue that foolishness is not only a means for finding distant solutions to complex problems but also a means for generating sustained motivation, well-being, and ideas that spark debate and lead to the questioning of taken-for-granted societal beliefs.","PeriodicalId":350799,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and Celebrating the Work of James G. March","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20210000076005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

James March argued that irrational approaches to problem solving and foolishness can be useful for addressing complex problems. Grand challenges are complex problems that often involve “guarded societal institutions” – societal beliefs and practices guarded by political or commercial powers. To explain how organizations with impossible goals dismantle such institutions by mobilizing irrationality and foolishness, we develop a process model which is illustrated with the case of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Our main contribution is to expand James March’s ideas on logics of action and organizational intelligence to advance a novel perspective for tackling big societal problems. We argue that foolishness is not only a means for finding distant solutions to complex problems but also a means for generating sustained motivation, well-being, and ideas that spark debate and lead to the questioning of taken-for-granted societal beliefs.
目标不可能实现的“傻瓜”:动员马奇的愚蠢技术来应对重大挑战
詹姆斯·马奇(James March)认为,解决问题的非理性方法和愚蠢可能对解决复杂问题有用。重大挑战是复杂的问题,通常涉及“受保护的社会制度”——由政治或商业力量保护的社会信仰和习俗。为了解释那些不可能实现目标的组织是如何通过动员非理性和愚蠢来瓦解这些制度的,我们开发了一个过程模型,以人道对待动物组织为例进行说明。我们的主要贡献是扩展了詹姆斯·马奇关于行动逻辑和组织智能的思想,为解决重大社会问题提供了一个新的视角。我们认为,愚蠢不仅是为复杂问题寻找遥远的解决方案的一种手段,也是产生持续动力、幸福感和想法的一种手段,这些想法会引发辩论,并导致对想当然的社会信仰的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信