发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Recommending Code Understandability Improvements Based on Code Reviews 推荐基于代码评审的代码可理解性改进
2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW) Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI: 10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00035
Delano Oliveira
{"title":"Recommending Code Understandability Improvements Based on Code Reviews","authors":"Delano Oliveira","doi":"10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00035","url":null,"abstract":"Developers spend 70% of their time understanding code. Code that is easy to read can save time, while hard-to-read code can lead to the introduction of bugs. However, it is difficult to establish what makes code more understandable. Although there are guides and directives on improving code understandability, in some contexts, these practices can have a detrimental effect. Practical software development projects often employ code review to improve code quality, including understandability. Reviewers are often senior developers who have contributed extensively to projects and have an in-depth understanding of the impacts of different solutions on code understandability. This paper is an early research proposal to recommend code understandability improvements based on code reviewer knowledge. The core of the proposal comprises a dataset of code understandability improvements extracted from code reviews. This dataset will serve as a basis to train machine learning systems to recommend understandability improvements.","PeriodicalId":349977,"journal":{"name":"2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127405010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The IntelliJ Platform: A Framework for Building Plugins and Mining Software Data IntelliJ平台:构建插件和挖掘软件数据的框架
2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW) Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00016
Zarina Kurbatova, Yaroslav Golubev, V. Kovalenko, T. Bryksin
{"title":"The IntelliJ Platform: A Framework for Building Plugins and Mining Software Data","authors":"Zarina Kurbatova, Yaroslav Golubev, V. Kovalenko, T. Bryksin","doi":"10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00016","url":null,"abstract":"In software engineering, a great number of new approaches are being actively researched, and a lot of tools are being developed based on them. These tools require a framework for their creation and an opportunity to be used by potential developers. Modern IDEs provide both. In this paper, we describe the main capabilities of the IntelliJ Platform that could be useful for researchers that are developing code analysis tools. To illustrate the benefits of using the platform, we describe several use cases that researchers might be interested in: mining software data, running machine learning models on code, recommending refactorings, and visualizing data in the IDE. We provide several examples of existing plugins that implement these cases. Finally, to make it easier to start working with the platform, we develop and provide simple plugins for each use case that could serve as a template for a new project.","PeriodicalId":349977,"journal":{"name":"2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123653336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Crypto Experts Advise What They Adopt 加密专家建议他们采用什么
2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW) Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI: 10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00044
Mohammadreza Hazhirpasand, Oscar Nierstrasz, Mohammad Ghafari
{"title":"Crypto Experts Advise What They Adopt","authors":"Mohammadreza Hazhirpasand, Oscar Nierstrasz, Mohammad Ghafari","doi":"10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00044","url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have shown that developers regularly seek advice on online forums to resolve their cryptography issues. We investigated whether users who are active in cryptography discussions also use cryptography in practice. We collected the top 1 % of responders who have participated in crypto discussions on Stack Overflow, and we manually analyzed their crypto contributions to open source projects on GitHub. We could identify 319 GitHub profiles that belonged to such crypto responders and found that 189 of them used cryptography in their projects. Further investigation revealed that the majority of analyzed users (i.e., 85 %) use the same programming languages for crypto activity on Stack Overflow and crypto contributions on GitHub. Moreover, 90 % of the analyzed users employed the same concept of cryptography in their projects as they advised about on Stack Overflow.","PeriodicalId":349977,"journal":{"name":"2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125572441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Worrisome Patterns in Developers: A Survey in Cryptography 开发人员的担忧模式:密码学调查
2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW) Pub Date : 2021-09-29 DOI: 10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00045
Mohammadreza Hazhirpasand, Oscar Nierstrasz, Mohammad Ghafari
{"title":"Worrisome Patterns in Developers: A Survey in Cryptography","authors":"Mohammadreza Hazhirpasand, Oscar Nierstrasz, Mohammad Ghafari","doi":"10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00045","url":null,"abstract":"We surveyed 97 developers who had used cryptography in open-source projects, in the hope of identifying developer security and cryptography practices. We asked them about individual and company-level practices, and divided respondents into three groups (i.e., high, medium, and low) based on their level of knowledge. We found differences between the high-profile developers and the other two groups. For instance, high-profile developers have more years of experience in programming, have attended more security and cryptography courses, have more background in security, are highly concerned about security, and tend to use security tools more than the other two groups. Never-theless, we observed worrisome patterns among all participants such as the high usage of unreliable sources like Stack Overflow, and the low rate of security tool usage.","PeriodicalId":349977,"journal":{"name":"2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121385199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Fairer Software Made Easier (using “Keys”) 更公平的软件更容易(使用“键”)
2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW) Pub Date : 2021-07-11 DOI: 10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00031
T. Menzies, Kewen Peng, Andre Lustosa
{"title":"Fairer Software Made Easier (using “Keys”)","authors":"T. Menzies, Kewen Peng, Andre Lustosa","doi":"10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00031","url":null,"abstract":"Software design means making choices. Some choices have ethical consequences. Hence, for better (more ethical) software, all we need to do is make better choices. In many software systems, the range of choices is surprisingly small due to a “keys effect”; where a few key choices control the rest. Just to say the obvious, for systems controlled by a few keys, explanation and control is just a matter of running a handful of “what-if” queries across the keys. By exploiting the keys effect, it should be possible to dramatically simplify even complex explanations, such as those required for ethical AI systems. This is a “research agenda” paper seeking feedback from the community about new ideas. Hence, while we offer some results (from prior publications), the most important part of this paper is perhaps the research questions listed at the end.","PeriodicalId":349977,"journal":{"name":"2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122747325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信