{"title":"Coronacrisis en rechtspleging","authors":"F. V. Dijk, E. Bauw","doi":"10.5553/rdw/138064242020041003002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5553/rdw/138064242020041003002","url":null,"abstract":"De coronacrisis stelt de rechtspleging in alle getroffen landen voor grote organisatorische uitdagingen en fundamentele juridische vragen. In het hogere belang van de beteugeling van de verspreiding van het virus nemen overheden vergaande maatregelen, waarbij burgerrechten in het geding zijn. Aan burgers en bedrijven worden bij overtreding ingrijpende sancties opgelegd. Waar gaat het optreden van de overheid, in het belang van de gezondheid van haar burgers, te ver en welke eisen moeten daaraan worden gesteld? De maatregelen hebben ook grote financiële en sociale gevolgen. De economische effecten doen bedrijven ondanks omvangrijke financiële steun wankelen en een keur van conflicten over contracten ligt op de loer. Hoe moeten de risico’s, die door niemand konden worden voorzien, worden verdeeld? Dit zijn evenzovele vragen die op enig moment aan de rechter zullen worden voorgelegd en het lijdt geen twijfel dat rechterlijke beslissingen in belangrijke mate de sociaaleconomische impact van de crisis zullen gaan bepalen. Tegelijkertijd is door gesloten gerechtsgebouwen en oplopende achterstanden in de eerste fase van de coronacrisis het beeld ontstaan van een tekortschietende rechtspleging. In deze bijdrage trachten wij, hoewel nog vroeg, een eerste beeld te geven van het functioneren van de rechtspleging in de coronacrisis. Centraal staan de vragen hoe de rechtspraak in de eerste fasen van de crisis heeft gefunctioneerd en welke rol de rechter zal kunnen gaan spelen in het verdere verloop van de crisis. Daarbij betrekken wij zowel het juridische als het sociaaleconomische perspectief. Het functioneren van de rechtspleging en de wijze waarop de rechter invulling geeft aan zijn rol heeft immers directe gevolgen voor de impact van de crisis op samenleving en economie. In deze bijdrage moet het blijven het bij een eerste verkenning van de materie nu op het moment van schrijven harde data slechts beperkt voorhanden zijn en empirisch onderzoek (nog) niet goed mogelijk is. Het gaat hier dan ook om impressies en niet om een verslag van onderzoek. Wij volgen voor de structuur de chronologie. In de crisis en de directe gevolgen daarvan onderscheiden wij vier fasen, die zich voor een deel nog moeten voltrekken en die in de volgende vier paragrafen vanuit rechtsplegingsperspectief onder de loep worden genomen (par. 2 tot en met 5). Voor iedere fase worden het functioneren van de rechtspleging en de rol van de rechter beschouwd in relatie tot de mogelijke sociaaleconomische aspecten daarvan. Wij eindigen met enkele nog voorlopige en voorzichtige conclu‐ sies (par. 6).","PeriodicalId":349954,"journal":{"name":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130859109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Roland Eshuis (7 augustus 1960 – 20 april 2020)","authors":"","doi":"10.5553/rdw/138064242020041001002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5553/rdw/138064242020041001002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":349954,"journal":{"name":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127521050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘De sok wint van de snor’","authors":"R. Knegt","doi":"10.5553/rdw/138064242020041001006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5553/rdw/138064242020041001006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":349954,"journal":{"name":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131353719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Recht der werkelijkheid in tijden van corona","authors":"N. Doornbos","doi":"10.5553/rdw/138064242020041001001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5553/rdw/138064242020041001001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":349954,"journal":{"name":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116555123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Upperdogs Versus Underdogs","authors":"L. M. Bruijn, Michel Vols","doi":"10.5553/RDW/138064242020041001004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5553/RDW/138064242020041001004","url":null,"abstract":"In the Netherlands, mayors are entitled to close both public and non-public premises due to drug-related criminal activities. In this paper, we argue that although rights and freedoms of individuals are endangered by these closures, mayors come out ahead in litigation. We build on Galanter’s framework on repeat players and one-shotters, and studies that attribute advantages to governmental parties to argue that mayors are the stronger party in drug-related closure cases and are therefore more likely to prevail over the opposing party in litigation. We categorized mayors as upperdogs and the opposing litigants as underdogs. Moreover, we distinguished the stronger from the weaker party among the mayors based on population size and case-specific experience. Similarly, we distinguished the stronger from the weaker party among underdogs. We classified businesses and organizations as the stronger party, relative to the individuals, which we classified as the weaker party. We find that mayors not only win more often, but also do so in the vast majority of cases. Moreover, contrary to our presumptions, we find that strong underdogs significantly boost the chance that the mayor will win the case in comparison to weak underdogs. The latter finding casts doubt on the assumption of Galanter that the stronger party comes out ahead in litigation. When controlling for particular case characteristics, such as the type of drugs and invoked defenses, our findings offer evidence that case characteristics are consequential for the resolution of drug-related closure cases in the Netherlands. The findings of our study reveal the importance of party capability and particular case characteristics. Moreover, our study adds a new dimension to our understanding of drug-related closure cases in the Netherlands.","PeriodicalId":349954,"journal":{"name":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124188352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The role of attitudes in the professional judicial decision-making progress: a work in progress","authors":"E. Olthuis","doi":"10.5553/rdw/138064242020041001007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5553/rdw/138064242020041001007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":349954,"journal":{"name":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129181862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Over rechtsbewustzijn en rechtsvervreemding","authors":"L.F.M. Ansems","doi":"10.5553/rdw/138064242019040003012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5553/rdw/138064242019040003012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":349954,"journal":{"name":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121609434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L. V. D. Kamp, M. Hordijk, J. Grin, G. Peek, Frank Alsema, Saskia Müller
{"title":"Participatie in circulaire\u0000 gebiedsontwikkeling","authors":"L. V. D. Kamp, M. Hordijk, J. Grin, G. Peek, Frank Alsema, Saskia Müller","doi":"10.5553/rdw/138064242019040002008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5553/rdw/138064242019040002008","url":null,"abstract":"We analyze two citizen collectives of \"professional city makers\" who have shaped participation in circular area development in anticipation of the Dutch Environment and Planning Act. The activities of professional city-makers form an interesting new phenomenon that requires attention as well as the implications: it is precisely through the professionalism of the city-makers’ efforts that there is a regular tension in the participation process between their role as citizen and professional in their contact with the government. We therefore discuss in what follows how the participation of professional city-makers in area development exposes different paradoxes that must be taken into account in the further implementation of the Environment and Planning Act. In short, we argue that participation in the Act is presented in a traditional way and does not fit the new role of citizens in area development in the 21st century.","PeriodicalId":349954,"journal":{"name":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126061151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}