{"title":"Examining Public Policy in Romania: Is It Transparent and Legitimated?","authors":"T. Dogaru","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2893881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2893881","url":null,"abstract":"In the last decades, in the context of many economic and financial crisis, the policy-making became the heart of government. In Romania, they represents the main instruments for solving the citizens’ problem: health care, education, the environment, and the mechanisms by which public money is budgeted. Therefore, this paper analyses the transparency and consultation in policy-making process from the view of different policy-making stages. The paper discusses the different mechanism and procedure designed and applied by Romanian government in policy-making process. Finally, it describes possible links between policy-making capacity and indicators for transparency, starting from Joseph Stiglitz assertion on the adverse effects of secrecy in government policy-making, “with more mistakes, public officials become more defensive; to protect themselves, they seek even more secrecy, narrowing in the circle still further, eroding still further the quality of decision-making”.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132376132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Multivector Strategy vs Quantum Strategy by Apple Inc","authors":"D. Ledenyov, Viktor O. Ledenyov","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2707662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2707662","url":null,"abstract":"We propose that the quantum strategy can be considered as a most effective winning virtuous organizational strategy, allowing the board of directors to build a prosperous organization with the optimal business model in the economies of the scale and scopes at the time of the great opportunities and unexpected challenges by the globalization. We provide a concise definition on the quantum strategy: The organizational strategy, which can be derived with the use of the quantum strategy search algorithm by the interlocking interconnecting directors in the board of directors in the modern organization at the time of the global integration. We demonstrate that the quantum strategy search algorithm applies the quantum logic (the probabilistic logic) on the top of the inductive, deductive and abductive logics (the value based logics), aiming to create the most effective optimal winning virtuous organizational strategy by the interlocking interconnecting directors in the board of directors in the modern organization in the information century. We highlight the main existing differences between the multivector strategy (the multiple different strategies implementation at the selected time period) and the quantum strategy (the most effective optimal winning virtuous organizational strategy implementation at the selected time period), considering the real-life case study on the strategy formulation and execution by the interlocking interconnecting directors in the board of directors in the Apple Inc. We express a research opinion that the quantum strategy can be clearly defined/distinguished in line with the generally accepted scientific definitions/meanings/ principles in the quantum mechanics science. We think that the prosperous organizations will create and implement the quantum strategies to increase their valuations and outperform the competitors in the economies of the scales and scopes at the time of globalization.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125468296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Materiality of Human Capital to Corporate Financial Performance","authors":"Aaron S. Bernstein, L. Beeferman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2605640","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2605640","url":null,"abstract":"Institutional investors have become increasingly interested in analyzing long-term investment risks and rewards posed by environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors. A growing body of data and analytical tools has been developed to assist in the task, but the focus has largely been on environmental and governance matters. This paper helps fill in the gap on social factors, specifically those involving how companies manage workplace relationships, a topic often referred to broadly as human capital or human resource (HR) management. We examine both a wide range of HR policies and separately those that relate directly to employee training.Our survey of the literature on human capital found 92 empirical studies that examined the relationship between HR polices and financial outcomes such as return on equity, return on investment and profit margins. We conclude that there is sufficient evidence of human capital materiality to financial performance to warrant inclusion in standard investment analysis. However, we also find that doing so remains a challenge for a number of reasons. These range from the fact that companies do not provide investors with comparable data to a lack of consensus over which combinations of policies have the most impact on financial outcomes.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134216453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"CEO Succession in the UK: An Analysis of the Effect of Censuring the CEO-to-Chair Move in the Combined Code on Corporate Governance 2003","authors":"E. Dedman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2342535","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2342535","url":null,"abstract":"In 2003, a new UK corporate governance Code recommended that the CEO should not become chairman of the same firm. The UK regulator, adopting an agency theory perspective, argued that this prevents powerful CEOs from clinging to power, to the detriment of firm performance. An alternative viewpoint, offered by stewardship theory, proposes that managers are inherently motivated to act in the best interests of the company and such controls are unnecessary, bringing no benefits to shareholders. This study therefore asks: (i) Does allowing the CEO to remain as chair damage firm performance? (ii) Did the changes to recommended best practice affect the number of CEOs remaining as chairman? (iii) Did the Combined Code (2003) affect the use of relay-style succession in the UK? Analysing a sample of 225 CEO routine departure events from 1996 to 2007 produces the answers: (i) this practice caused no apparent harm to accounting or stock market performance; (ii) there was a significant reduction in the practice in the period following the reform; and (iii) while UK firms were employing relay-style succession practices prior to the reforms, this has since abated. Overall, the evidence fails to support the agency view adopted by UK regulators.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128107964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Estimating Management Practice Complementarity between Decentralization and Performance Pay","authors":"Bryan Hong, Lorenz Kueng, Mu-Jeung Yang","doi":"10.3386/W20845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W20845","url":null,"abstract":"The existence of complementarity across management practices has been proposed as one potential explanation for the persistence of firm-level productivity differences. However, thus far no conclusive population-level tests of the complementary joint adoption of management practices have been conducted. Using unique detailed data on internal organization, occupational composition, and firm performance for a nationally representative sample of firms in the Canadian economy, we exploit regional variation in income tax progression as an instrument for the adoption of performance pay. We find systematic evidence for the complementarity of performance pay and decentralization of decision-making from principals to employees. Furthermore, in response to the adoption of performance pay, we find a concentration of decision-making at the level of managerial employees, as opposed to a general movement towards more decentralization throughout the organization. Finally, we find that adoption of performance pay is related to other types of organizational restructuring, such as greater use of outsourcing, Total Quality Management, re-engineering, and a reduction in the number of layers in the hierarchy.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"344 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115891236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Corporate Governance Structures in International Business Compared: Case Study of GDF SUEZ (France) and Williams (USA)","authors":"Akshay Singh","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2843369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2843369","url":null,"abstract":"A comparative study of Corporate Governance structures at two organizations situated across the Atlantic Ocean has been conducted to understand the rationale for the observed differences from an international versus a nationally focused business perspective. A research based recommendation for possible changes to improve the Corporate Governance at these firms is performed with a hope that it shall raise awareness and allow the executives at similar organizations to understand and apply the knowledge to the benefit of their firms and shareholders. The author also hopes that the analysis shall trigger further research to aid in the continuous improvement in Corporate Governance practices globally.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117184605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Special Legal Instruments for Placement of Shares in the Course of a Joint-Stock Company Reorganization: 'Stock Conversion Procedure'","authors":"Andrei Glushetskiy, V. B. Minasyan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2425543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2425543","url":null,"abstract":"We have analyzed the content and described the procedure of a special legal instrument used in course of issuable securities placement within the framework of reorganization, i.e. stocks conversion procedure. We have considered its influence on the equity capital structure of legal successors. We found out that stocks conversion procedure is a sequence of actions aimed at the determination of securities’ quantity to be issued to every shareholder in place of cancelled stocks of the legal predecessor using a specific stocks conversion ratio. Differences in the stocks conversion procedure are related to stocks conversion, as to whether every share shall be converted separately, or just a certain set of shares which shall be subject to conversion. We have described three types of candidate procedures aimed at determination of securities quantity to be placed to a shareholder while using the stocks conversion method. We formulated mathematical model for every algorithm. We analyzed the stocks conversion procedure under conditions of cross-shareholding by shareholders of a company under reorganization. The proposed method enables us to determine the real participation interest under the actual control of certain shareholders in the context of their indirect participation in equity capitals by virtue of other legal bodies. Nowadays, it is a very pressing problem to reveal the real dependence and affiliation of the participants in the economic turnover.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116161817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How Might Corporate Charters Be Amended to Enhance Investor Returns?","authors":"S. Turnbull","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2417843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2417843","url":null,"abstract":"The research question of this paper is how might investors enhance their returns by amending corporate constitutions and/or by-laws of investee corporations? Porter (1992) identified how European and Japanese firms obtained systemic competitive advantages over US firms because US firms lacked feedback, independently of management, from their stakeholders like customers, suppliers and employees and host communities on firm performance, risks and opportunities. Hippel (1986) identified customer feedback as a major source of innovative opportunities. Evidence of systemic risk of US corporations was provided by the US government commission of inquiry into the 2008 financial crisis that identified as a “key cause” the “dramatic failures of corporate governance and risk management”. Forensic research has since revealed that stakeholders who knew of risks were not connected to individuals with the incentive, power and capability to take corrective action. Stakeholder controlled firms illustrate how appropriate changes in corporate constitutions can introduce a requisite variety of private feedback connections with a diversity of stakeholders, independently of management, to directors and when required also to shareholders. The feedback can not only cross check the integrity of management information but also identify for directors and shareholders completeness of executive knowledge of the known known’s and known unknowns while also adding value with intelligence on the unknown unknowns. Shareholder participation is recommended for developing appropriate resolutions to amend constitutions of investee firms.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116361939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Towards Re-Theorizing the Firm in Pursuit of Well-Being and Social Justice","authors":"G. Nathan","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-23081-8_9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23081-8_9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124566154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Leadership for Expansion, Growth and CSR Initiatives: The Case of Allcargo Logistics Limited","authors":"G. Joshi, Rakesh R Shetty","doi":"10.17493/NMR/2013/57291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17493/NMR/2013/57291","url":null,"abstract":"The modern theories of the firm maintain a distinction between ownership and management. This distinction becomes operationally meaningful with good corporate governance. There can be a cultural transformation even in public enterprises when corporate governance practices are adopted. Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance are the means by which individuals come to construe the basic values required in the functioning of a business enterprise. The success of Allcargo Logistics Limited (ALL) was basically the accomplishment of a single person who could win the confidence of his employees with sense of involvement made this success possible. Thus case study of ALL holds significance for its unique and socially useful performance, deserving attention of researchers in social and management sciences.","PeriodicalId":347848,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Management eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132764014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}