发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 9 DE MARZO DE 2017 (171/2017) 对最高法院2017年3月9日判决的评论(171/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.9
Mariano Yzquierdo Tolsada
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 9 DE MARZO DE 2017 (171/2017)","authors":"Mariano Yzquierdo Tolsada","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116185798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 21 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2017 (625/2017) 对最高法院2017年11月21日判决的评论(625/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.7
Alvaro José Martín Martín
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 21 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2017 (625/2017)","authors":"Alvaro José Martín Martín","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127422006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 22 DE FEBRERO DE 2017 (114/2017) 对最高法院2017年2月22日判决的评论(114/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.24
Mariano Yzquierdo Tolsada
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 22 DE FEBRERO DE 2017 (114/2017)","authors":"Mariano Yzquierdo Tolsada","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125936270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 13 DE SEPTIEMBRE DE 2017 (492/2017) 对最高法院2017年9月13日判决的评论(492/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.21
Alfonso Luis Calvo Caravaca, Javier Carrascosa González
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 13 DE SEPTIEMBRE DE 2017 (492/2017)","authors":"Alfonso Luis Calvo Caravaca, Javier Carrascosa González","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.21","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130073338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 24 DE MAYO DE 2017 (324/2017) 对最高法院2017年5月24日判决的评论(324/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.37
Andrés Juan Recalde Castells, A. Flórez
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 24 DE MAYO DE 2017 (324/2017)","authors":"Andrés Juan Recalde Castells, A. Flórez","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.37","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.37","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121485937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO A LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 25 DE MAYO DE 2017 (2306/2017) 对最高法院2017年5月25日判决的评论(2306/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.10
{"title":"COMENTARIO A LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 25 DE MAYO DE 2017 (2306/2017)","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121494226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 19 DE JUNIO DE 2017 (385/2017) 对最高法院2017年6月19日判决的评论(385/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.19
Marta Lalaguna Holzwarth
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 19 DE JUNIO DE 2017 (385/2017)","authors":"Marta Lalaguna Holzwarth","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.19","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125180161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 29 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2017 (652/2017) 对最高法院2017年11月29日判决的评论(652/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.29
F. D. P. B. Gascó
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 29 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2017 (652/2017)","authors":"F. D. P. B. Gascó","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.29","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129472426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 4 DE JULIO DE 2017 (419/2017) 对最高法院2017年7月4日判决的评论(419/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.20
Enrique Vallines García
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 4 DE JULIO DE 2017 (419/2017)","authors":"Enrique Vallines García","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.20","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131357194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO A LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 27 DE JUNIO DE 2017 (3988/2017) 对最高法院2017年6月27日判决的评论(3988/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017 Pub Date : 2018-10-23 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.34
{"title":"COMENTARIO A LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 27 DE JUNIO DE 2017 (3988/2017)","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.34","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116398126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信