对最高法院2017年5月25日判决的评论(2306/2017)

{"title":"对最高法院2017年5月25日判决的评论(2306/2017)","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":344338,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMENTARIO A LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 25 DE MAYO DE 2017 (2306/2017)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":344338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil. Volumen 9. 2017","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zcj15.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}