Studia Politica Slovaca最新文献_第2页

Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Populist Leaders and Populist Parties in Poland 波兰民粹主义领导人和民粹主义政党在Facebook和网络上分享的信息来源

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-2.5

Artur Lipiński

{"title":"Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Populist Leaders and Populist Parties in Poland","authors":"Artur Lipiński","doi":"10.31577/sps.2021-2.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sps.2021-2.5","url":null,"abstract":"National-conservative Law and Justice Party (PiS) is seen as quite open to the innovative use of social media. Moreover, the government led by PiS is aiming at regulating social media in a dual way – on the one hand to prevent blocking by social media platforms, on the other hand to allow intervention and blocking by authorities. Regarding our findings, not surprisingly, the preferred source of information for both PiS and Confederation (Konfederacja) were digital sources. TV was the least often linked media outlet for PiS and radio for Confederation, respectively. All the linked media were national or with mixed origin, there were no links to European/supranational media. The overwhelming majority of links were websites and social media accounts of Confederation and PiS, their individual politicians or YouTube materials produced by these two groupings. Left and liberal media were systematically ignored when around 10% were common to both profiles, including FaceBook (FB). These were mostly mainstream media of diverse type (news websites, YouTube, radio, TV) and left, centre and centre-right ideological leanings. The political orientation of the shared sources reflected the inclination of populist parties and their coalitions to promote right wing discourses. PiS as a large party oriented towards the centre represents centre-right and Confederation represents radical right. The references to the media classified as centre-right constituted 96% of PiS sample and 66% of Confederation sample. The network analysis showed that both parties were embedded in two almost separate bubbles which are linked together by a very limited set of sources. They stayed in reciprocal relations mostly with their own separated structures, organizations, politicians or FB discussion groups.","PeriodicalId":34402,"journal":{"name":"Studia Politica Slovaca","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43358642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Nigel Farage and the UKIP Party in the UK 奈杰尔·法拉奇和英国独立党在脸书和网络上分享的信息来源

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-3.3

Lena Karamanidou, O. Şahin

{"title":"Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Nigel Farage and the UKIP Party in the UK","authors":"Lena Karamanidou, O. Şahin","doi":"10.31577/sps.2021-3.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sps.2021-3.3","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how UKIP and Nigel Farage used social media to amplify their message. Mainly digital sources, such as websites and social media, were the preferred source type of both profiles, but more for UKIP than for N. Farage. The most shared digital content of both profiles was websites and social media accounts of their political parties. The second most used source type was print media – mainly national newspapers. Radio stations were the least used source by UKIP, while TV channels the least used source by N. Farage. The higher use of radio sources concerns links to LBC Radio, where he presented a show between 2019 and 2020. TV channels and radio were largely ignored by both profiles as sources. In terms of ownership, sources used by either profile were in their vast majority private due to prevailing type of ownership in the UK. Both profiles relied more on quality newspapers and magazines rather than tabloids but this was often accompanied by a critical approach to the content of such sources. The analysis found that Farage’s profile has only four reciprocal connections. In contrast, UKIP had a much larger reciprocal network of 25 different pages. While in terms of reciprocity the two profiles maintained different networks, the analysis of centrality showed a significant number of 63 pages shared the profiles of both UKIP and Nigel Farage. Although the profile of N. Farage had a much smaller reciprocal network and the number of shares of the two profiles by the central groups disseminating their messages was roughly equal, yet, the Brexit Party and N. Farage were the more successful political actors in the period of interest to this study – in the 2019 European Parliamentary elections.","PeriodicalId":34402,"journal":{"name":"Studia Politica Slovaca","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49611093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Populism and Social Media: an Introduction into Meta-Theory 民粹主义与社交媒体：元理论导论

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-2.1

Andrej Školkay

引用次数: 0

France: Two Separate Populist Parties; Two Separate Networks and One Go-Between Group 法国:两个独立的民粹主义政党两个独立的网络和一个中介组

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-2.2

Martin Baloge, N. Hubé

引用次数: 2

Media Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking: Erdoğan and the AKP in Turkey 在Facebook和网络上分享媒体资源:Erdoğan和土耳其的正义与发展党

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-3.2

O. Şahin

引用次数: 1

Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Populist Leaders in Italy 意大利民粹主义领导人在Facebook和网络上分享的信息来源

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-2.4

Arturo Bertero

{"title":"Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Populist Leaders in Italy","authors":"Arturo Bertero","doi":"10.31577/sps.2021-2.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sps.2021-2.4","url":null,"abstract":"Social media (Facebook, WhatsApp and YouTube) seem to be the key tool for accessing news in Italy. Coincidentally, they are also the key tool for communication and (internet-based) organisational aspects of two rather different populist parties (5SM and League) and their leaders, Di Maio (until January 2020) and Salvini. Salvini and Di Maio‘s FB pages shared contents that were not exactly analogous but still they present some similar characteristics. Among differences one can note that Salvini in contrast to Di Maio shared more frequently local content. Moreover, Salvini virtually ignored European sources. Network analysis showed that Salvini‘s FB page network was relatively far more extensive than Di Maio‘s. Interestingly, FB groups and pages sharing Di Maio’s posts were rather symbolic in numbers and mainly organized as bottom-up initiatives by small groups of militants that were not directly or formally linked to the 5SM. Conversely, those FB pages and groups more prone to share Salvini‘s contents tended to perceive themselves as local sections of the party. Both leaders tended to share content that supported their arguments, or at least content that they could use to support their own interpretation.","PeriodicalId":34402,"journal":{"name":"Studia Politica Slovaca","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45252149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Populist Leaders and Populist Parties in Slovakia 斯洛伐克民粹主义领导人和民粹主义政党在脸书和网络上共享的信息来源

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-3.1

Andrej Školkay, A. Marincea

{"title":"Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Populist Leaders and Populist Parties in Slovakia","authors":"Andrej Školkay, A. Marincea","doi":"10.31577/sps.2021-3.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sps.2021-3.1","url":null,"abstract":"The case study undergoes an analysis of the FaceBook (FB) activity of two Slovak populist entities, one lead by Boris Kollár and OĽaNO movement. The aim was to explore whether and how they construct a populist network and draw on media sources that are out of the mainstream or associated with a populist style. Both selected entities were highly active and quite successful in their communication on FB throughout most of the last five years at least. The study finds that these entities publish sources and connect with other FB pages that mostly confirm their parties’ positions and alliances. Yet there was no preference for alternative sources, understood as disseminating hyper-partisan or fake news and hoaxes, often associated with populist parties. Rather, OĽaNO had some reciprocity in media visibility with mainstream liberal media, in the sense that the party drew on liberal mainstream sources, which also covered the parties’ activities. In sharing posts, Boris Kollár had the most intensive dissemination network, while movements WAF and OĽaNO were very similar in terms of size of their network. There was a rather low cross-promotion. OĽaNO supporters were more appreciative of the efforts made by murdered journalist Ján Kuciak, and showed a stronger focus against Smer-SD (Direction-Social Democracy). In contrast, Kollár was associated more with pro-Christian, national and social rhetoric.","PeriodicalId":34402,"journal":{"name":"Studia Politica Slovaca","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43340423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Digital Services Act Proposal (Social Media Regulation) 数字服务法案提案（社交媒体条例）

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-3.5

O. Moravec, I. Smieško, E. Galewska, Gergely Gosztonyi, Sirio Zolea, Pascal Schneiders

引用次数: 0

Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by a Populist Leader in Greece 希腊民粹主义领袖在脸书和网络上分享的信息来源

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-2.3

Andrej Školkay, A. Marincea

{"title":"Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by a Populist Leader in Greece","authors":"Andrej Školkay, A. Marincea","doi":"10.31577/sps.2021-2.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sps.2021-2.3","url":null,"abstract":"Greek politicians tend to more intensively use their social media accounts during the pre-electoral periods. In general, Syriza had to fight both established mainstream parties and the mainstream media since its founding, including while in power. Yet Syriza’s campaign on the Internet between 2006 and 2015 relied mainly on alternative media activists. In 2019, Alexis Tsipras prioritized sharing content from digital sources (mainly own created content such as comments or videos posted on his FB page) and occasionally articles from the websites of newspapers or links from the Syriza website or FB account. Not surprisingly, there were no links shared from radio or TV stations. The content shared by Tsipras, other than his own messaging which constituted the vast majority of his posts, came from predominantly left or centre-left publications. The reciprocity network of Tsipras was limited to posts shared between the account of Alexis Tsipras and the official account of his party. The accounts that shared the posts of Alexis Tsipras, ́were either accounts or pages dedicated to Alexis Tsipras or Syriza. The communication strategy of Alexis Tsipras lacked a discernible “populist pattern” of communication, at least in terms of the types of sources shared and the type of social media network that the leader of Syriza participates in.","PeriodicalId":34402,"journal":{"name":"Studia Politica Slovaca","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43456839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Transparency: a key principle in gender-trade relationship 透明度：两性贸易关系的一项关键原则

Studia Politica Slovaca Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI: 10.31577/sps.2021-1.2

Desire Ilaguno Cerezo, Elizabeth Valdés-miranda Fernández

引用次数: 0